77
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pauci-immune Crescentic Glomerulonephritis Due to MGRS Crystalline Nephropathy

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction There are several known mechanisms by which monoclonal Igs (MIg) or their subunits can cause kidney disease: (i) deposition in 1 or more kidney compartments, resulting in distinct clinicopathologic lesions, such as Ig-related amyloidosis, monoclonal Ig deposition disease, and a variety of glomerulonephritides, including cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis type I and II, immunotactoid glomerulonephritis, and proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits; (ii) precipitation in tubular lumina (e.g., myeloma cast nephropathy); (iii) activation of the alternative pathway of complement (e.g., C3 glomerulopathy associated with monoclonal gammopathy, thrombotic microangiopathy associated with monoclonal gammopathy); (iv) cytokine activation (e.g., POEMS syndrome); and (v) crystallization in the renal vasculature (e.g., crystalglobulin-induced nephropathy).1, 2 Here, we describe an unusual case of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS)–associated crystalline nephropathy that does not conform to any of the previously described patterns of kidney involvement by monoclonal gammopathy. Case Presentation A 59-year-old woman presented with severe anemia (hemoglobin 6.9 g/dl) and kidney injury (serum creatinine 3.06 mg/dl), which was up from 1.1 mg/dl 6 months before presentation. Past medical history included type 2 diabetes mellitus, essential hypertension, seropositive rheumatoid arthritis, and untreated IgG kappa monoclonal gammopathy diagnosed 13 months prior. Physical examination revealed mild peripheral edema; otherwise unrevealing. Laboratory evaluation was notable for a proteinuria of 5.6 g/d, microscopic hematuria, a low serum albumin at 2.9 g/dl, and a hemoglobin A1C of 7.1%. Hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C antibody, HIV antibody, antinuclear antibodies, anti-double-stranded DNA, anti-myeloperoxidase, anti-proteinase 3, and anti-glomerular basement membrane were all negative. Serum complement 3 was low and serum complement 4 was normal. Testing for serum cryoglobulin was positive (1%, type 1 cryoglobulin). Serum protein electrophoresis with immunofixation revealed a small IgG kappa MIg (0.32 g/dl). Serum free kappa and lambda light chains were elevated with a kappa:lambda ratio of 1.7. Renal sonography was negative for obstruction or masses. Computed tomography of chest, abdomen, and pelvis were negative for lymphadenopathy. Because of worsening kidney function and proteinuria, the patient was empirically treated with 3 days of pulse steroids and started on 60 mg of prednisone thereafter, and renal biopsy was performed. Renal Biopsy Finding Seventeen glomeruli were sampled for light microscopy, 5 of which were globally sclerotic. There was mild segmental mesangial sclerosis. Five glomeruli showed segmental cellular crescents, some of which were associated with fibrinoid necrosis with fibrin deposition and karyorrhexis (Figure 1a and b). Four glomeruli revealed large hypereosinophilic rod-shaped and irregular crystals within the urinary space and podocytes (Figure 1d), some of which were present in areas of fibrinoid necrosis and crescents (Supplementary Figure S1). Glomeruli without crescent formation did not show endocapillary hypercellularity or intracapillary infiltrating monocytes /macrophages, and no intracapillary pseudothrombi or crystals within the glomerular lumina were seen (Figure 1c). The glomerular basement membranes were mildly thickened with normal contour. There was moderate tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis with mild interstitial inflammation and acute tubular injury. One small interlobular artery showed luminal and intimal thrombosis and karyorrhexis, without arteritis or crystals. The remaining arteries were unremarkable. Figure 1 Light microscopic findings. (a) A glomerulus shows a segmental cellular crescent (arrow). The underlying glomerular tuft exhibits mild mesangial sclerosis (periodic acid–Schiff stain, original magnification ×200). (b) Another glomerulus shows a segmental cellular crescent with fibrinoid necrosis characterized by fibrin (dark red material) extravasation into the urinary space (trichrome stain, original magnification ×400). (c) Glomeruli without crescents or crystals do not show endocapillary hypercellularity or monocyte/macrophage infiltration (periodic acid–Schiff stain, original magnification ×100). (d) A glomerulus showing large hypereosinophilic crystals within the urinary space (hematoxylin and eosin, original magnification ×400). On immunofluorescence, glomeruli were negative for IgA, C1q, and C3. There was linear diffuse glomerular and tubular basement membranes for albumin (3+) and IgG (1+), a common finding in diabetic nephropathy. Focal glomerular tuft staining for fibrinogen in areas of crescent formation was present. There was focal staining of protein resorption droplets within podocytes/urinary space for kappa with negative staining for lambda (Supplementary Figure S2). Staining for IgG, kappa, and lambda by immunofluorescence on pronase-digested, paraffin-embedded tissue and by the immunoperoxidase technique failed to stain the crystals. On electron microscopy, some podocytes contained large intracytoplasmic rod-shaped electron-dense crystals (Figure 2a and b). On high power, the crystals showed a lamellated substructure characterized by parallel linear arrays (Figure 2c). No crystals were seen within mesangial, endothelial, or proximal tubular epithelial cells, or within glomerular or interstitial inflammatory cells or histiocytes. Podocytes showed segmental foot process effacement. Glomeruli also showed moderate global mesangial sclerosis and thickening of glomerular basement membranes, and were devoid of immune complex type granular electron-dense deposits, punctate deposits, or fibrillary deposits. The final clinicopathologic diagnosis was crescentic and necrotizing glomerulonephritis secondary to monoclonal gammopathy–associated crystalline nephropathy, concurrent with diffuse diabetic glomerulosclerosis and focal arterial thrombosis. Figure 2 Electron microscopic findings. (a,b) Electron-dense crystals are seen within podocytes (arrows). The underlying glomerular tuft shows features of diabetic nephropathy with mesangial sclerosis and thickening of the glomerular basement membranes (original magnification ×6000 for a, b). On high power, the crystals show a lamellated substructure characterized by parallel linear arrays (original magnification ×80,000). Follow-up Bone marrow biopsy revealed 3 very small foci of kappa-restricted plasma cells, without evidence of crystals. The patient received 7 sessions of plasmapheresis for her crescentic glomerulonephritis but renal function failed to improve and hemodialysis was started for severe azotemia and uremic symptoms. She then received a dose of i.v. 500 mg of cyclophosphamide and was started on Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 therapy with plan to continue therapy on a schedule of 2.2 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle for 6 cycles. The patient developed palpable rash coinciding with an increase in cryocrit to 5%. She completed 3 cycles of therapy with Bortezomib. Her renal function gradually improved and was eventually taken off from hemodialysis after 4 months. Repeat urine studies showed proteinuria of 5.3 g/d, serum creatinine of 3.2 mg/dl with estimated creatinine clearance of 17 ml/min. Repeat cryocrit was 1% and skin rash also resolved. Discussion MGRS is a recently described term that refers to clonal proliferative disorders that produce nephrotoxic MIg but do not meet hematological criteria for specific treatment.1, 3 MGRS renal lesions associated with MIg deposition are divided into 3 large categories based on their ultrastructural appearance: lesions with granular deposits (e.g., monoclonal Ig deposition disease, proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal Ig deposits); lesions with fibrillary or microtubular deposits (e.g., AL amyloidosis, cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis types I and II, immunotactoid glomerulopathy), and lesions with crystalline deposits or inclusions. 1 MGRS lesions with crystalline deposits can be separated into 2 categories based on whether the crystals are intracellular or extracellular/intravascular. Lesions with intracellular crystals include light chain proximal tubulopathy with crystals “light chain Fanconi syndrome” in which the crystals are located within proximal tubular cytoplasm, and crystal-storing histiocytosis characterized by crystalline light chain inclusions within interstitial histiocytes and occasionally in tubular cells, glomerular cells, and other organs, particularly the bone marrow.4, 5 Very rarely, few needle-shaped crystals are seen in the cytoplasm of intracapillary infiltrating macrophages or endothelial cells in otherwise typical pathologic features of cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis. Paraprotein-induced crystalline nephropathies with predominantly extracellular crystals are exemplified by crystalglobulin-induced nephropathy associated with crystalglobulinemia and crystalcryoglobulinemia that is characterized by large extracellular crystals within the lumen of arterioles, arteries, and/or glomerular capillaries with or without secondary vascular thrombosis. 6 Podocyte crystals associated with plasma cell dyscrasia have only rarely been described in the literature, typically in association with crystals within proximal tubular cells and interstitial histiocytes in the setting of crystal-storing histiocytosis.7, 8, 9 Patients who typically have IgG kappa monoclonal gammopathy (MGRS or symptomatic multiple myeloma), present with proteinuria with or without renal insufficiency, and light microscopy may show focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. 7 – S1 However, 2 cases of IgG kappa MIg-associated isolated crystalline podocytopathy (i.e., without crystals in other renal cells or histiocytes) have been recently reported, one of which was associated with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.S2 , S3 To our knowledge, our case is the first case of monoclonal gammopathy–associated crystalline podocytopathy associated with crescentic and necrotizing glomerulonephritis. In this patient, large crystals were seen in podocytes and the urinary space, which on ultrastructural examination showed a lamellated substructure consistent with MIg crystals. 6 , S2 The crystals focally were present in areas of crescents and fibrinoid necrosis, suggesting that extravasation of large amount of light chain crystals from podocyte into the urinary space may have caused endothelial injury triggering an in situ severe inflammatory reaction leading to crescentic and necrotizing glomerulonephritis. In the case reported by Yang et al. podocyte crystals protruded into the urinary space and formed cilia-like membrane spikes on the cell surface supporting that the light chain crystals in the urinary space were coming from podocytes.S2 In our patient, it is possible that the circulating MIg kappa light chains have passed through the glomerular basement membrane, entered the podocyte cytoplasm through endocytosis (supported by staining of podocyte protein droplets for kappa light chain by immunofluorescence) and then crystallized inside their lysosomes. The absence of crystals within proximal tubular cells or tubular lumina argues against the possibility that podocyte crystals originated from the urinary space after backflowing from the tubules (Table 1). No crystals were seen within vessels or glomerular capillaries, arguing against crystal cryoglobulinemia-associated crystalglobulin-induced nephropathy, although focal arterial thrombosis was seen, which could be secondary to adjacent unsampled intravascular crystals. The patient had cryoglobulinemia with a skin rash, but the biopsy findings were not consistent with this diagnosis considering the absence of endocapillary hypercellularity, intracapillary infiltrating monocytes, membranoproliferative features, or mesangial, subendothelial, or intraluminal deposits. Table 1 Teaching points • There are several mechanisms by which monoclonal Igs cause renal injury, the pattern of which depends on the location of deposits in the kidney. • Crystalline podocytopathy associated with plasma cell disorders is characterized by crystal deposition within the podocytes. • Crystalline deposits can exhibit FSGS or a necrotizing crescentic pattern. • The crystalline variant of pauci-immune crescentic GN is thought to be due to an inflammatory response triggered by the crystalline paraproteins extruding from podocytes. • The monoclonal crystals may lack IF staining due to the highly organized structure of monoclonal crystals. FSGS, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; GN, glomerulonephritis; IF, immunofluorescence. Notably, the glomerular crystals did not stain for kappa or lambda light chains by immunofluorescence on frozen tissue, by immunofluorescence on pronase-digested paraffin tissue, or by the immunoperoxidase method, as has been described in a minority of cases of crystalline light chain proximal tubulopathy 5 and crystal-storing histiocytosis including cases with podocyte involvment.4, 8 This could be due their highly organized structure that potentially prevents the antibodies from reaching their target epitopes. It is also possible that the crystals contain only fragments of the variable domain of MIg, as reported in crystal-storing histiocytosis, 4 leading to false-negative results with the commercially available anti-Ig light chains that are directed against epitopes in the constant domains. Protein droplets within podocytes/urinary space in our patient stained positive for kappa with negative lambda by immunofluorescence, similar to the circuiting paraprotein light chain isotype, favoring that the crystals are likely composed of kappa light chain. The principle of management of MGRS relies on identifying the underlying clonal cell and targeting therapy against the clone responsible for renal injury. 1 The treatment involves chemotherapeutic agents targeting plasma cell clone including Bortezomib in addition to steroid and cyclophosphamide (CyBorD), whereas rituximab is the preferred treatment against B-cell clones.S4 Because their rarity, there has not been a standard treatment for paraprotein-related crystalline nephropathies, but clone-targeted therapy similar to other MGRS lesions is a logical approach. In our patient with a nephritogenic monoclonal plasma cell clone who presented with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, Bortezomib-based therapy led to improvement of kidney function with discontinuation of dialysis, but 3 months through therapy she continued to have proteinuria, which could be secondary to irreversible glomerular scars/fibrous crescents following the active crescentic glomerulonephritis and/or resulted from the concurrent diabetic nephropathy. The role of plasmapheresis is unclear in this condition, but might be more important in patients with high tumor burden to decrease the level of circulating MIg light chains. Our patient received plasmapheresis because of the crescentic phenotype, the rapid decline in renal function, and the circulating cryoglobulin. Conclusions This case describes an unusual presentation of paraprotein-related renal injury, with podocyte crystalline deposits and associated pauci-immune crescentic glomerulonephritis. Thus, MGRS-associated crystalline podocytopathy should be included in the differential diagnosis of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–negative pauci-immune crescentic and necrotizing glomerulonephritis. The diagnosis of this lesion requires careful clinicopathologic correlation and ultrastructural examination of kidney biopsy, and treatment should be directed at the underling hematologic condition. Further research is needed to investigate the pathomechanisms of this rare lesion. Disclosure All the authors declared no competing interests.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: a consensus report of the International Kidney and Monoclonal Gammopathy Research Group

          The term monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) was introduced by the International Kidney and Monoclonal Gammopathy Research Group (IKMG) in 2012. The IKMG met in April 2017 to refine the definition of MGRS and to update the diagnostic criteria for MGRS-related diseases. Accordingly, in this Expert Consensus Document, the IKMG redefines MGRS as a clonal proliferative disorder that produces a nephrotoxic monoclonal immunoglobulin and does not meet previously defined haematological criteria for treatment of a specific malignancy. The diagnosis of MGRS-related disease is established by kidney biopsy and immunofluorescence studies to identify the monotypic immunoglobulin deposits (although these deposits are minimal in patients with either C3 glomerulopathy or thrombotic microangiopathy). Accordingly, the IKMG recommends a kidney biopsy in patients suspected of having MGRS to maximize the chance of correct diagnosis. Serum and urine protein electrophoresis and immunofixation, as well as analyses of serum free light chains, should also be performed to identify the monoclonal immunoglobulin, which helps to establish the diagnosis of MGRS and might also be useful for assessing responses to treatment. Finally, bone marrow aspiration and biopsy should be conducted to identify the lymphoproliferative clone. Flow cytometry can be helpful in identifying small clones. Additional genetic tests and fluorescent in situ hybridization studies are helpful for clonal identification and for generating treatment recommendations. Treatment of MGRS was not addressed at the 2017 IKMG meeting; consequently, this Expert Consensus Document does not include any recommendations for the treatment of patients with MGRS.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Light Chain Proximal Tubulopathy: Clinical and Pathologic Characteristics in the Modern Treatment Era.

            Light chain proximal tubulopathy (LCPT) is characterized by cytoplasmic inclusions of monoclonal LC within proximal tubular cells. The significance of crystalline versus noncrystalline LCPT and the effect of modern therapies are unknown. We reported the clinical-pathologic features of 40 crystalline and six noncrystalline LCPT patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2014. All crystalline LCPTs were κ-restricted and displayed acute tubular injury. One-third of noncrystalline LCPT patients displayed λ-restriction or acute tubular injury. Only crystalline LCPT frequently required antigen retrieval to demonstrate monoclonal LC by immunofluorescence. In five of 38 patients, crystals were not detectable by light microscopy, but they were visible by electron microscopy. Hematolymphoid neoplasms, known before biopsy in only 15% of patients, included 21 monoclonal gammopathies of renal significance; 15 multiple myelomas; seven smoldering multiple myelomas; and three other neoplasms. Biopsy indications included Fanconi syndrome (38%; all with crystalline LCPT), renal insufficiency (83%), and proteinuria (98%). Follow-up was available for 30 (75%) patients with crystalline LCPT and all six patients with noncrystalline LCPT, of whom 11 underwent stem cell transplant, 16 received chemotherapy only, and nine were untreated. Complete or very good partial hematologic remissions occurred in six of 22 treated crystalline LCPT patients. By multivariable analysis, the only independent predictor of final eGFR was initial eGFR, highlighting the importance of early detection. All patients with crystalline LCPT treated with stem cell transplant had stable or improved kidney function, indicating the effectiveness of aggressive therapy in selected patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Dysproteinemias and Glomerular Disease

              Dysproteinemia is characterized by the overproduction of an Ig by clonal expansion of cells from the B cell lineage. The resultant monoclonal protein can be composed of the entire Ig or its components. Monoclonal proteins are increasingly recognized as a contributor to kidney disease. They can cause injury in all areas of the kidney, including the glomerular, tubular, and vascular compartments. In the glomerulus, the major mechanism of injury is deposition. Examples of this include Ig amyloidosis, monoclonal Ig deposition disease, immunotactoid glomerulopathy, and cryoglobulinemic GN specifically from types 1 and 2 cryoglobulins. Mechanisms that do not involve Ig deposition include the activation of the complement system, which causes complement deposition in C3 glomerulopathy, and cytokines/growth factors as seen in thrombotic microangiopathy and precipitation, which is involved with cryoglobulinemia. It is important to recognize that nephrotoxic monoclonal proteins can be produced by clones from any of the B cell lineages and that a malignant state is not required for the development of kidney disease. The nephrotoxic clones that do not meet requirement for a malignant condition are now called monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance. Whether it is a malignancy or monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance, preservation of renal function requires substantial reduction of the monoclonal protein. With better understanding of the pathogenesis, clone-directed strategies, such as rituximab against CD20 expressing B cell and bortezomib against plasma cell clones, have been used in the treatment of these diseases. These clone-directed therapies been found to be more effective than immunosuppressive regimens used in nonmonoclonal protein–related kidney diseases.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Kidney Int Rep
                Kidney Int Rep
                Kidney International Reports
                Elsevier
                2468-0249
                27 July 2019
                October 2019
                27 July 2019
                : 4
                : 10
                : 1503-1507
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
                [2 ]Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
                Author notes
                [] Correspondence: Shailendra Sharma, Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, George Washington University, 2150 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 3-438, Washington, DC 20037, USA. ssharma@ 123456mfa.gwu.edu
                Article
                S2468-0249(19)31433-0
                10.1016/j.ekir.2019.07.013
                6829195
                d699f24c-66e4-46ff-8170-526825edaa89
                © 2019 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 10 May 2019
                : 15 July 2019
                : 22 July 2019
                Categories
                Nephrology Round

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content20

                Cited by2

                Most referenced authors171