Long-Term Outcomes of Imatinib Treatment for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Related collections

Most cited references 28

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013.

Michele Baccarani, Michael Deininger, Gianantonio Rosti … (2013)

Advances in chronic myeloid leukemia treatment, particularly regarding tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mandate regular updating of concepts and management. A European LeukemiaNet expert panel reviewed prior and new studies to update recommendations made in 2009. We recommend as initial treatment imatinib, nilotinib, or dasatinib. Response is assessed with standardized real quantitative polymerase chain reaction and/or cytogenetics at 3, 6, and 12 months. BCR-ABL1 transcript levels ≤10% at 3 months, 10% at 6 months and >1% from 12 months onward define failure, mandating a change in treatment. Similarly, partial cytogenetic response (PCyR) at 3 months and complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) from 6 months onward define optimal response, whereas no CyR (Philadelphia chromosome-positive [Ph+] >95%) at 3 months, less than PCyR at 6 months, and less than CCyR from 12 months onward define failure. Between optimal and failure, there is an intermediate warning zone requiring more frequent monitoring. Similar definitions are provided for response to second-line therapy. Specific recommendations are made for patients in the accelerated and blastic phases, and for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Optimal responders should continue therapy indefinitely, with careful surveillance, or they can be enrolled in controlled studies of treatment discontinuation once a deeper molecular response is achieved.

0 comments Cited 604 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Dasatinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.

Hagop Kantarjian, Neil P. Shah, Andreas Hochhaus … (2010)

Treatment with dasatinib, a highly potent BCR-ABL kinase inhibitor, has resulted in high rates of complete cytogenetic response and progression-free survival among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase, after failure of imatinib treatment. We assessed the efficacy and safety of dasatinib, as compared with imatinib, for the first-line treatment of chronic-phase CML. In a multinational study, 519 patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML were randomly assigned to receive dasatinib at a dose of 100 mg once daily (259 patients) or imatinib at a dose of 400 mg once daily (260 patients). The primary end point was complete cytogenetic response by 12 months, confirmed on two consecutive assessments at least 28 days apart. Secondary end points, including major molecular response, were tested at a significance level of 0.0001 to adjust for multiple comparisons. After a minimum follow-up of 12 months, the rate of confirmed complete cytogenetic response was higher with dasatinib than with imatinib (77% vs. 66%, P=0.007), as was the rate of complete cytogenetic response observed on at least one assessment (83% vs. 72%, P=0.001). The rate of major molecular response was higher with dasatinib than with imatinib (46% vs. 28%, P<0.0001), and responses were achieved in a shorter time with dasatinib (P<0.0001). Progression to the accelerated or blastic phase of CML occurred in 5 patients who were receiving dasatinib (1.9%) and in 9 patients who were receiving imatinib (3.5%). The safety profiles of the two treatments were similar. Dasatinib, administered once daily, as compared with imatinib, administered once daily, induced significantly higher and faster rates of complete cytogenetic response and major molecular response. Since achieving complete cytogenetic response within 12 months has been associated with better long-term, progression-free survival, dasatinib may improve the long-term outcomes among patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00481247.) 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society

0 comments Cited 366 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia.

Giuseppe Saglio, Dong-Wook Kim, Philipp le Coutre … (2010)

Nilotinib has been shown to be a more potent inhibitor of BCR-ABL than imatinib. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of nilotinib, as compared with imatinib, in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase. In this phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter study, we assigned 846 patients with chronic-phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive nilotinib (at a dose of either 300 mg or 400 mg twice daily) or imatinib (at a dose of 400 mg once daily). The primary end point was the rate of major molecular response at 12 months. At 12 months, the rates of major molecular response for nilotinib (44% for the 300-mg dose and 43% for the 400-mg dose) were nearly twice that for imatinib (22%) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The rates of complete cytogenetic response by 12 months were significantly higher for nilotinib (80% for the 300-mg dose and 78% for the 400-mg dose) than for imatinib (65%) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Patients receiving either the 300-mg dose or the 400-mg dose of nilotinib twice daily had a significant improvement in the time to progression to the accelerated phase or blast crisis, as compared with those receiving imatinib (P=0.01 and P=0.004, respectively). No patient with progression to the accelerated phase or blast crisis had a major molecular response. Gastrointestinal and fluid-retention events were more frequent among patients receiving imatinib, whereas dermatologic events and headache were more frequent in those receiving nilotinib. Discontinuations due to aminotransferase and bilirubin elevations were low in all three study groups. Nilotinib at a dose of either 300 mg or 400 mg twice daily was superior to imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00471497.) 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society

0 comments Cited 355 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

All references

Author and article information

Journal

Title: New England Journal of Medicine

Abbreviated Title: N Engl J Med

Publisher: New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM/MMS)

ISSN (Print): 0028-4793

ISSN (Electronic): 1533-4406

Publication date Created: March 09 2017

Publication date (Print): March 09 2017

Volume: 376

Issue: 10

Pages: 917-927

Article

DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609324

PMC ID: 5901965

PubMed ID: 28273028

SO-VID: d68dc5be-b94d-4cd7-b525-77bfb4bcf260

History

Data availability:

Comments

Comment on this article

scite_

Cited by 388

See all cited by

Most referenced authors 671

See all reference authors

Long-Term Outcomes of Imatinib Treatment for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Read this article at

Abstract

Related collections

Annual Reviews Societal Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic

Most cited references 28

European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013.

Dasatinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.

Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia.

Author and article information

Journal

Article

History

Comments

Comment on this article

Similar content 3,337

Cited by 388

Most referenced authors 671