20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Lightfield hyperspectral imaging in neuro-oncology surgery: an IDEAL 0 and 1 study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) has shown promise in the field of intra-operative imaging and tissue differentiation as it carries the capability to provide real-time information invisible to the naked eye whilst remaining label free. Previous iterations of intra-operative HSI systems have shown limitations, either due to carrying a large footprint limiting ease of use within the confines of a neurosurgical theater environment, having a slow image acquisition time, or by compromising spatial/spectral resolution in favor of improvements to the surgical workflow. Lightfield hyperspectral imaging is a novel technique that has the potential to facilitate video rate image acquisition whilst maintaining a high spectral resolution. Our pre-clinical and first-in-human studies (IDEAL 0 and 1, respectively) demonstrate the necessary steps leading to the first in-vivo use of a real-time lightfield hyperspectral system in neuro-oncology surgery.

          Methods

          A lightfield hyperspectral camera (Cubert Ultris ×50) was integrated in a bespoke imaging system setup so that it could be safely adopted into the open neurosurgical workflow whilst maintaining sterility. Our system allowed the surgeon to capture in-vivo hyperspectral data (155 bands, 350–1,000 nm) at 1.5 Hz. Following successful implementation in a pre-clinical setup (IDEAL 0), our system was evaluated during brain tumor surgery in a single patient to remove a posterior fossa meningioma (IDEAL 1). Feedback from the theater team was analyzed and incorporated in a follow-up design aimed at implementing an IDEAL 2a study.

          Results

          Focusing on our IDEAL 1 study results, hyperspectral information was acquired from the cerebellum and associated meningioma with minimal disruption to the neurosurgical workflow. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of HSI acquisition with 100+ spectral bands at a frame rate over 1Hz in surgery.

          Discussion

          This work demonstrated that a lightfield hyperspectral imaging system not only meets the design criteria and specifications outlined in an IDEAL-0 (pre-clinical) study, but also that it can translate into clinical practice as illustrated by a successful first in human study (IDEAL 1). This opens doors for further development and optimisation, given the increasing evidence that hyperspectral imaging can provide live, wide-field, and label-free intra-operative imaging and tissue differentiation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial.

          5-Aminolevulinic acid is a non-fluorescent prodrug that leads to intracellular accumulation of fluorescent porphyrins in malignant gliomas-a finding that is under investigation for intraoperative identification and resection of these tumours. We aimed to assess the effect of fluorescence-guided resection with 5-aminolevulinic acid on surgical radicality, progression-free survival, overall survival, and morbidity. 322 patients aged 23-73 years with suspected malignant glioma amenable to complete resection of contrast-enhancing tumour were randomly assigned to 20 mg/kg bodyweight 5-aminolevulinic acid for fluorescence-guided resection (n=161) or to conventional microsurgery with white light (n=161). The primary endpoints were the number of patients without contrast-enhancing tumour on early MRI (ie, that obtained within 72 h after surgery) and 6-month progression-free survival as assessed by MRI. Secondary endpoints were volume of residual tumour on postoperative MRI, overall survival, neurological deficit, and toxic effects. We report the results of an interim analysis with 270 patients in the full-analysis population (139 assigned 5-aminolevulinic acid, 131 assigned white light), which excluded patients with ineligible histological and radiological findings as assessed by central reviewers who were masked as to treatment allocation; the interim analysis resulted in termination of the study as defined by the protocol. Primary and secondary endpoints were analysed by intention to treat in the full-analysis population. The study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00241670. Median follow-up was 35.4 months (95% CI 1.0-56.7). Contrast-enhancing tumour was resected completely in 90 (65%) of 139 patients assigned 5-aminolevulinic acid compared with 47 (36%) of 131 assigned white light (difference between groups 29% [95% CI 17-40], p<0.0001). Patients allocated 5-aminolevulinic acid had higher 6-month progression free survival than did those allocated white light (41.0% [32.8-49.2] vs 21.1% [14.0-28.2]; difference between groups 19.9% [9.1-30.7], p=0.0003, Z test). Groups did not differ in the frequency of severe adverse events or adverse events in any organ system class reported within 7 days after surgery. Tumour fluorescence derived from 5-aminolevulinic acid enables more complete resections of contrast-enhancing tumour, leading to improved progression-free survival in patients with malignant glioma.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An extent of resection threshold for newly diagnosed glioblastomas.

            The value of extent of resection (EOR) in improving survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains controversial. Specifically, it is unclear what proportion of contrast-enhancing tumor must be resected for a survival advantage and how much survival improves beyond this threshold. The authors attempt to define these values for the patient with newly diagnosed GBM in the modern neurosurgical era. The authors identified 500 consecutive newly diagnosed patients with supratentorial GBM treated at the University of California, San Francisco between 1997 and 2009. Clinical, radiographic, and outcome parameters were measured for each case, including MR imaging-based volumetric tumor analysis. The patients had a median age of 60 years and presented with a median Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score of 80. The mean clinical follow-up period was 15.3 months, and no patient was unaccounted for. All patients underwent resection followed by chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The median postoperative tumor volume was 2.3 cm(3), equating to a 96% EOR. The median overall survival was 12.2 months. Using Cox proportional hazards analysis, age, KPS score, and EOR were predictive of survival (p < 0.0001). A significant survival advantage was seen with as little as 78% EOR, and stepwise improvement in survival was evident even in the 95%-100% EOR range. A recursive partitioning analysis validated these findings and provided additional risk stratification parameters related to age, EOR, and tumor burden. For patients with newly diagnosed GBMs, aggressive EOR equates to improvement in overall survival, even at the highest levels of resection. Interestingly, subtotal resections as low as 78% also correspond to a survival benefit.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The CIEDE2000 color-difference formula: Implementation notes, supplementary test data, and mathematical observations

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neurosci
                Front Neurosci
                Front. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-4548
                1662-453X
                18 September 2023
                2023
                : 17
                : 1239764
                Affiliations
                [1] 1School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Science, King's College London , London, United Kingdom
                [2] 2Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital , London, United Kingdom
                [3] 3Hypervision Surgical Limited , London, United Kingdom
                [4] 4School of Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London , London, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Edited by: Bruno Montcel, Université de Lyon, France

                Reviewed by: Eric Suero Molina, University Hospital Münster, Germany; Kamran Avanaki, University of Illinois Chicago, United States

                *Correspondence: Oscar MacCormac oscar.j.maccormac@ 123456kcl.ac.uk
                Article
                10.3389/fnins.2023.1239764
                10544348
                37790587
                d64dc814-6d92-4c1f-80bb-853ccd992b38
                Copyright © 2023 MacCormac, Noonan, Janatka, Horgan, Bahl, Qiu, Elliot, Trotouin, Jacobs, Patel, Bergholt, Ashkan, Ourselin, Ebner, Vercauteren and Shapey.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 13 June 2023
                : 31 August 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 14, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 73, Pages: 18, Words: 10723
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute for Health and Care Research, doi 10.13039/501100000272;
                Award ID: NIHR202114
                Funded by: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, doi 10.13039/501100000266;
                Award ID: EP/T517963/1
                Award ID: NS/A000049/1
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust, doi 10.13039/100010269;
                Award ID: WT203148/Z/16/Z
                Award ID: WT223880/Z/21/Z
                Funded by: Royal Academy of Engineering, doi 10.13039/501100000287;
                Award ID: RCSRF1819\7\34
                Funded by: Innovate UK, doi 10.13039/501100006041;
                Award ID: 75124
                This project received funding by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Invention for Innovation (i4i) Programme (Grant Reference Number NIHR202114). OM was funded by the EPSRC Research Council, part of the EPSRC DTP, Grant Ref: [EP/T517963/1]. This work was supported by the Wellcome [WT223880/Z/21/Z]. This work was supported by core funding from the Wellcome/EPSRC [WT203148/Z/16/Z; NS/A000049/1]. TV was supported by a Medtronic/RAEng Research Chair [RCSRF1819\7\34]. CH was supported by an InnovateUK Secondment Scholars Grant (Project Number 75124). For the purpose of open access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Brain Imaging Methods

                Neurosciences
                hyperspectral imaging (hsi),lightfield camera,tissue differentiation,intra-operative imaging,neuro-oncology,neurosurgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content250

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors654