3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Can bioplastics always offer a truly sustainable alternative to fossil‐based plastics?

      other
      1 , 2 , 1 , 2 ,
      Microbial Biotechnology
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Bioplastics, comprised of bio‐based and/or biodegradable polymers, have the potential to play a crucial role in the transition towards a sustainable circular economy. The use of biodegradable polymers not only leads to reduced greenhouse gas emissions but also might address the problem of plastic waste persisting in the environment, especially when removal is challenging. Nevertheless, biodegradable plastics should not be considered as substitutes for proper waste management practices, given that their biodegradability strongly depends on environmental conditions. Among the challenges hindering the sustainable implementation of bioplastics in the market, the development of effective downstream recycling routes is imperative, given the increasing production volumes of these materials. Here, we discuss about the most advisable end‐of‐life scenarios for bioplastics. Various recycling strategies, including mechanical, chemical or biological (both enzymatic and microbial) approaches, should be considered. Employing enzymes as biocatalysts emerges as a more selective and environmentally friendly alternative to chemical recycling, allowing the production of new bioplastics and added value and high‐quality products. Other pending concerns for industrial implementation of bioplastics include misinformation among end users, the lack of a standardised bioplastic labelling, unclear life cycle assessment guidelines and the need for higher financial investments. Although further research and development efforts are essential to foster the sustainable and widespread application of bioplastics, significant strides have already been made in this direction.

          Abstract

          End‐of‐life (EoL) scenarios of bioplastics from a circular plastic economy perspective.

          Related collections

          Most cited references75

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Chemically recyclable polymers: a circular economy approach to sustainability

          Developing recyclable polymers provides a solution to materials' end-of-life issues and also an approach to establish a circular materials economy. The current practices in the generation and disposal of synthetic polymers are largely unsustainable. As part of the solution, the development of biodegradable polymers, which constitute a class of “green polymers” according to green chemistry principles, has been intensively pursued in the past two decades. However, the degradation of such polymers in Earth's landfills typically leads to no recovery of the materials’ value, and their degradation in the Oceans could create new or unintended environmental consequences. Industrial mechanical recycling always suffers from a significant quality loss. The proposed more sustainable solution is to develop chemically recyclable polymers that not only solve the end-of-life issue of polymers, but also provide a direct approach to establish a circular materials economy. Accordingly, this critical review article captures some selected highlights of the emerging area of recyclable “green polymers” by focusing on the major progress made and the technical and environmental benefits obtained in the development of repurposing and depolymerization processes for chemical recycling of polymers at the end of their useful life.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Microbial enzymes for the recycling of recalcitrant petroleum‐based plastics: how far are we?

            Summary Petroleum‐based plastics have replaced many natural materials in their former applications. With their excellent properties, they have found widespread uses in almost every area of human life. However, the high recalcitrance of many synthetic plastics results in their long persistence in the environment, and the growing amount of plastic waste ending up in landfills and in the oceans has become a global concern. In recent years, a number of microbial enzymes capable of modifying or degrading recalcitrant synthetic polymers have been identified. They are emerging as candidates for the development of biocatalytic plastic recycling processes, by which valuable raw materials can be recovered in an environmentally sustainable way. This review is focused on microbial biocatalysts involved in the degradation of the synthetic plastics polyethylene, polystyrene, polyurethane and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Recent progress in the application of polyester hydrolases for the recovery of PET building blocks and challenges for the application of these enzymes in alternative plastic waste recycling processes will be discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Bioplastics for a circular economy

              Bioplastics — typically plastics manufactured from bio-based polymers — stand to contribute to more sustainable commercial plastic life cycles as part of a circular economy, in which virgin polymers are made from renewable or recycled raw materials. Carbon-neutral energy is used for production and products are reused or recycled at their end of life (EOL). In this Review, we assess the advantages and challenges of bioplastics in transitioning towards a circular economy. Compared with fossil-based plastics, bio-based plastics can have a lower carbon footprint and exhibit advantageous materials properties; moreover, they can be compatible with existing recycling streams and some offer biodegradation as an EOL scenario if performed in controlled or predictable environments. However, these benefits can have trade-offs, including negative agricultural impacts, competition with food production, unclear EOL management and higher costs. Emerging chemical and biological methods can enable the ‘upcycling’ of increasing volumes of heterogeneous plastic and bioplastic waste into higher-quality materials. To guide converters and consumers in their purchasing choices, existing (bio)plastic identification standards and life cycle assessment guidelines need revision and homogenization. Furthermore, clear regulation and financial incentives remain essential to scale from niche polymers to large-scale bioplastic market applications with truly sustainable impact. Plastics support modern life but are also associated with environmental pollution. This Review discusses technologies for the production and recycling of bioplastics as part of a more sustainable and circular economy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                auxi@cib.csic.es
                Journal
                Microb Biotechnol
                Microb Biotechnol
                10.1111/(ISSN)1751-7915
                MBT2
                Microbial Biotechnology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1751-7915
                03 April 2024
                April 2024
                : 17
                : 4 ( doiID: 10.1111/mbt2.v17.4 )
                : e14458
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Polymer Biotechnology Group, Department of Plant and Microbial Biotechnology, Biological Research Centre Margarita Salas Spanish National Research Council (CIB‐CSIC) Madrid Spain
                [ 2 ] Interdisciplinary Platform for Sustainable Plastics Towards a Circular Economy‐CSIC (SusPlast‐CSIC) Madrid Spain
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                M. Auxiliadora Prieto, Polymer Biotechnology Group, Department of Plant and Microbial Biotechnology, Biological Research Centre Margarita Salas, Spanish National Research Council (CIB‐CSIC), Madrid, Spain.

                Email: auxi@ 123456cib.csic.es

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3436-0237
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8038-1223
                Article
                MBT214458 MICROBIO-2024-087.R1
                10.1111/1751-7915.14458
                10990045
                38568795
                d5ade0a2-eb54-4247-b031-fa196835fa87
                © 2024 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 08 March 2024
                : 12 February 2024
                : 14 March 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 1, Pages: 10, Words: 6023
                Funding
                Funded by: CSIC Interdisciplinary Thematic Platform Sustainable Plastics towards a Circular Economy (PTI‐SusPlast)
                Funded by: Horizon 2020 Framework Programme , doi 10.13039/100010661;
                Award ID: (Mix‐UP‐870294)
                Funded by: Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades , doi 10.13039/100014440;
                Award ID: PID2020‐112766RB‐C21
                Award ID: PLEC2021‐008188
                Categories
                Opinion
                Opinion
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                April 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.4.0 mode:remove_FC converted:03.04.2024

                Biotechnology
                Biotechnology

                Comments

                Comment on this article