1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The relationship between patient satisfaction and visual and optical outcome after bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus multifocal intraocular lens

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To evaluate patient satisfaction after implantation of the Tecnis Symfony multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL).

          Methods

          120 eyes of 60 subjects with senile cataract were bilaterally implanted with the Tecnis Symfony IOL. Follow-up examination was performed 6 months postoperatively. Main outcome measures included uncorrected and corrected distance and near visual acuity, manifest refraction, and visual quality metrics. According to their subjective symptoms patient were divided in two groups: satisfied and unsatisfied.

          Results

          Uncorrected intermediate (0.15 ​± ​0.11 vs 0.18 ​± ​0.01, P ​= ​0.04) and near (0.26 ​± ​0.12 vs 0.31 ​± ​0.11, P ​= ​0.04) (UIVA, UNVA) log MAR visual acuity was significantly better, cylindrical error less (0.31 ​± ​0.36 vs 0.67 ​± ​0.29, P ​= ​0.05), axial length (AL) smaller (23.68 ​± ​1.3 vs 24.22 ​± ​1.6, P ​= ​0.05), Strehl ratio higher (0.08 ​± ​0.08 vs 0.05 ​± ​0.04, P ​= ​0.03) and mesopic pupil larger (4.3 ​± ​1.1 vs 3.7 ​± ​1.05, P ​= ​0.01) among satisfied patients.Residual cylinder, Strehl ratio, halos, mesopic pupil diameter and UNVA were significant predictors of patient satisfaction. Uncorrected distance visual acuity, higher order Strehl ratio and pupil diameter were significant predictors of halos. Near visual acuity significantly correlated ( P ​= ​0.018, R ​= ​0.22) with axial length.

          Conclusions

          Uncorrected cylindrical error, poor reading quality, larger pupil and halos seem to be the most disturbing factors for patients implanted with the Tecnis Symfony IOL.

          Highlights

          • Visual quality measures are better indicators of subjective visual dissatisfaction than traditional visual acuity.

          • Uncorrected cylindrical error, poor reading quality, larger pupil and halos seem to be the most disturbing factors for patients implanted with the Symfony IOL.

          • Patients with shorter axial length had a better uncorrected near visual acuity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: an orientation.

          J Hanley (2003)
          The method of generalized estimating equations (GEE) is often used to analyze longitudinal and other correlated response data, particularly if responses are binary. However, few descriptions of the method are accessible to epidemiologists. In this paper, the authors use small worked examples and one real data set, involving both binary and quantitative response data, to help end-users appreciate the essence of the method. The examples are simple enough to see the behind-the-scenes calculations and the essential role of weighted observations, and they allow nonstatisticians to imagine the calculations involved when the GEE method is applied to more complex multivariate data.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dissatisfaction after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses.

            To analyze the symptoms, etiology, and treatment of patient dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Department of Ophthalmology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands. Case series. In this retrospective chart review, the main outcome measures were type of complaints, uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities, uncorrected and distance-corrected near visual acuities, refractive state, pupil diameter and wavefront aberrometry measurements, and type of treatment. Seventy-six eyes of 49 patients were included. Blurred vision (with or without photic phenomenon) was reported in 72 eyes (94.7%) and photic phenomena (with or without blurred vision) in 29 eyes (38.2%). Both symptoms were present in 25 eyes (32.9%). Residual ametropia and astigmatism, posterior capsule opacification, and a large pupil were the 3 most significant etiologies. Sixty-four eyes (84.2%) were amenable to therapy, with refractive surgery, spectacles, and laser capsulotomy the most frequent treatment modalities. Intraocular lens exchange was performed in 3 cases (4.0%). The cause of dissatisfaction after implantation of a multifocal IOL can be identified and effective treatment measures taken in most cases. Copyright © 2011 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Multifocal intraocular lenses: An overview.

              Multifocal intraocular lenses are increasingly used in the management of pseudophakic presbyopia. After multifocal intraocular lens implantation, most patients do not need spectacles or contact lenses and are pleased with the result. Complications, however, may affect the patient's quality of life and level of satisfaction. Common problems with multifocal lenses are blurred vision and photic phenomena associated with residual ametropia, posterior capsule opacification, large pupil size, wavefront anomalies, dry eye, and lens decentration. The main reasons for these are failure to neuroadapt, lens dislocation, residual refractive error, and lens opacification. To avoid patient dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation, it is important to consider preoperatively the patient's lifestyle; perform an exhaustive examination including biometry, topography, and pupil reactivity; and explain the visual expectations and possible postoperative complications.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res
                Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res
                Advances in Ophthalmology Practice and Research
                Elsevier
                2667-3762
                11 March 2022
                May-Jun 2022
                11 March 2022
                : 2
                : 1
                : 100043
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Ophthalmology, Clinic Hietzing, Vienna, Austria
                [b ]Karl Landsteiner Institute of Process Optimization and QM in Cataract Surgery, Vienna, Austria
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. 1130, Vienna, Wolkersbergenstrasse 1, Austria. kata.mihaltz@ 123456gesundheitsverbund.at
                Article
                S2667-3762(22)00020-8 100043
                10.1016/j.aopr.2022.100043
                10577816
                37846221
                d572bba6-e59a-40bc-844f-bdaa35448b58
                © 2022 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 1 November 2021
                : 24 February 2022
                : 28 February 2022
                Categories
                Full Length Article

                multifocal iol,edof,patient satisfaction,optical quality

                Comments

                Comment on this article