16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      To strike or not to strike? an investigation of the determinants of strike participation at the Fridays for Future climate strikes in Switzerland

      research-article
      1 , * , 1 , 2
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Fridays for Future strikes involve students striking for increased action on climate change, and this movement has spread to 185 countries and received widespread media attention. This exploratory study investigates motives for participating or not in the climate strikes and future participation among students in Switzerland. In a sample of N = 638 university students, we found that trust in climate scientists, low trust in governments, response efficacy, protest enjoyment and the perceived success of the strikes predicted participation. Contrary to statements in the public media but consistent with the literature, students who participated in the climate strikes reported consuming less meat, flying less and taking more steps to compensate the CO 2 emissions from flights compared to students who did not participate. We discuss how the insights from this study help reveal the determinants of youth collective action on climate change.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives.

          An integrative social identity model of collective action (SIMCA) is developed that incorporates 3 socio-psychological perspectives on collective action. Three meta-analyses synthesized a total of 182 effects of perceived injustice, efficacy, and identity on collective action (corresponding to these socio-psychological perspectives). Results showed that, in isolation, all 3 predictors had medium-sized (and causal) effects. Moreover, results showed the importance of social identity in predicting collective action by supporting SIMCA's key predictions that (a) affective injustice and politicized identity produced stronger effects than those of non-affective injustice and non-politicized identity; (b) identity predicted collective action against both incidental and structural disadvantages, whereas injustice and efficacy predicted collective action against incidental disadvantages better than against structural disadvantages; (c) all 3 predictors had unique medium-sized effects on collective action when controlling for between-predictor covariance; and (d) identity bridged the injustice and efficacy explanations of collective action. Results also showed more support for SIMCA than for alternative models reflecting previous attempts at theoretical integration. The authors discuss key implications for theory, practice, future research, and further integration of social and psychological perspectives on collective action. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ValidationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                14 October 2021
                2021
                : 16
                : 10
                : e0257296
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Institute for Environmental Decisions, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
                [2 ] Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
                University of Sheffield, UNITED KINGDOM
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3706-8669
                Article
                PONE-D-20-32959
                10.1371/journal.pone.0257296
                8516297
                d5633ed5-027d-42f4-8867-db6ffde5d293
                © 2021 Cologna et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 20 October 2020
                : 28 August 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 3, Pages: 17
                Funding
                The authors received no specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Earth Sciences
                Atmospheric Science
                Climatology
                Climate Change
                Science Policy
                Science and Technology Workforce
                Careers in Research
                Scientists
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Scientists
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Emotions
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Emotions
                Earth Sciences
                Atmospheric Science
                Climatology
                Climate Change
                Anthropogenic Climate Change
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Collective Human Behavior
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Collective Human Behavior
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Agriculture
                Animal Products
                Meat
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Nutrition
                Diet
                Food
                Meat
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Nutrition
                Diet
                Food
                Meat
                Physical Sciences
                Chemistry
                Chemical Compounds
                Carbon Dioxide
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Medical Risk Factors
                Custom metadata
                Most relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. Additionally, the dataset used to compute analyses is available here: https://osf.io/e5uby/.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article