118
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The suitability of an uncemented hydroxyapatite coated (HAC) hip hemiarthroplasty stem for intra-capsular femoral neck fractures in osteoporotic elderly patients: the Metaphyseal-Diaphyseal index, a solution to preventing intra-operative periprosthetic fracture

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study will seek to identify a measurable radiographic index, the Metaphyseal-Diaphyseal Index (MDI) score to determine whether intra-operative fracture in osteoporotic bone can be predicted.

          A 5 year prospective cohort of 560 consecutive patients, undergoing hemiarthroplasty (cemented or uncemented), was evaluated. A nested case-control study to determine risk factors affecting intra-operative fracture was carried out.

          The Vancouver Classification was used to classify periprosthetic fracture.

          The MDI score was calculated using radiographs from the uncemented group. As a control (gold standard), Yeung et al's Canal Bone Ratio (CBR) score was also calculated. From this, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was formulated for both scores and area under the curve (AUC) compared. Intra and inter-observer correlations were determined.

          Cost analysis was also worked out for adverse outcomes.

          Four hundred and seven uncemented and one hundred and fifty-three cemented stems were implanted. The use of uncemented implants was the main risk factor for intra-operative periprosthetic fracture.

          Sixty-two periprosthetic fractures occurred in the uncemented group (15.2%), nine occurred in the cemented group (5.9%), P < 0.001. The revision rate for sustaining a periprosthetic fracture (uncemented group) was 17.7%, P < 0.001 and 90 day mortality 19.7%, P < 0.03.

          MDI's AUC was 0.985 compared to CBR's 0.948, P < 0.001. The MDI score cut-off to predict fracture was 21, sensitivity 98.3%, specificity 99.8%, positive predictive value 90.5% and negative predictive value 98%. Multivariate regression analysis ruled out any other confounding factors as being significant.

          The intra and inter-observer Pearson correlation scores were r = 0.99, P < 0.001.

          JRI uncemented hemiarthroplasty has a significantly higher intra-operative fracture rate. We recommend cemented arthroplasty for hip fractures. We propose a radiographic system that may allow surgeons to select patients who are good candidates for uncemented arthroplasty, but it needs prospective validation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Hip fracture.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur.

            In the field of uncemented hip arthroplasties, secondary biologic fixation of femoral implants depends directly on the quality of the primary stability. Metaphyseal filling and a good fit between the implant and the proximal femur improve initial stabilization and optimize the transmission of forces to the bone. Precise knowledge of the three-dimensional femoral shape is essential to the design and selection of adapted implants. Three hundred ten femurs in 300 patients suffering from primary hip osteoarthritis were analyzed by computed tomography scanning. After three-dimensional reconstruction, several measurements were extracted, and the parameters essential to the characterization of the diverse femoral morphologies encountered were identified. A new classification of the proximal femur is proposed. The consequences on the design and the preoperative selection of femoral implants are discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Assessment of the proximal femoral morphology using plain radiograph-can it predict the bone quality?

              We evaluated the relationship between the radiological indices that assessed the proximal femoral morphology and the degree of osteoporosis in 45 Chinese cadaveric femora. Canal-calcar ratio, canal flare index, morphological cortical index, and canal bone ratio were determined in the plain anteroposterior radiographs. Canal bone ratio is the ratio between the endosteal and outer diameters of the proximal femur at 10 cm below the lesser trochanter. Bone mineral density of the proximal femora was measured with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and T score that depicted the degree of osteoporosis was determined. Canal bone ratio showed a strong correlation with the T score (r = -0.71, P < .001) and the best overall performance in diagnosing osteoporosis with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The proximal femur was likely to be osteoporotic if the canal bone ratio was 0.49 or higher.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Orthop Surg Res
                Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
                BioMed Central
                1749-799X
                2011
                18 November 2011
                : 6
                : 59
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, South London Healthcare NHS Trust, Stadium Road, Greenwich, London, SE18 4QH, UK
                [2 ]Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Princess Royal University Hospital, South London, Healthcare NHS Trust, Farnborough Common, Orpington, BR6 8ND, Kent, UK
                [3 ]Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Darent Valley Hospital, Darenth Wood Road, Dartford, DA2 8DA, Kent, UK
                [4 ]Institute of Postgraduate Medicine,Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 9PX, UK
                Article
                1749-799X-6-59
                10.1186/1749-799X-6-59
                3231806
                22099169
                d50088dc-8787-488e-a822-43297c3851c3
                Copyright ©2011 Chana et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 30 March 2011
                : 18 November 2011
                Categories
                Research Article

                Surgery
                hip fracture,peri-prosthetic fracture,osteoporosis,uncemented hemiarthroplasty
                Surgery
                hip fracture, peri-prosthetic fracture, osteoporosis, uncemented hemiarthroplasty

                Comments

                Comment on this article