2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Heritability of Psychological Traits and Developmental Milestones in Infancy : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

      research-article
      , MRes 1 , , , DClinPsy 1 , , PhD 2 , , PhD 3 ,
      JAMA Network Open
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the correlation of genetic and shared and nonshared environment factors with infant developmental milestones.

          Key Points

          Question

          What are the overall genetic and shared and nonshared environment estimates for psychological traits and developmental milestones in infancy?

          Findings

          In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 139 infant twin studies involving almost 80 000 twins globally, moderate to high genetic and shared and nonshared environment estimates were found across a range of important psychological traits and developmental milestones in infancy.

          Meaning

          These results offer insight into the degree to which genes and environments estimate outcomes in key domains of infant functioning and suggest highly heritable traits that may be particularly suitable candidates for gene discovery.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Although infancy is the most rapid period of postnatal growth and development, factors associated with variation in infant traits are not well understood.

          Objective

          To synthesize the large twin study literature partitioning phenotypic variance in psychological traits and developmental milestones in infancy into estimates of heritability and shared and nonshared environment.

          Data Sources

          PubMed, PsycINFO, and references of included publications were searched up to February 11, 2021.

          Study Selection

          Peer-reviewed publications using the classical twin design to study psychological traits and developmental milestones from birth to 2 years old were included.

          Data Extraction and Synthesis

          Data were extracted in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and categorized using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Children and Youth Version . Data were pooled in 3-level random effects models, incorporating within-cohort variance in outcome measurement and between-cohort variance. Data were analyzed from March 2021 through September 2021.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The primary outcomes were monozygotic and dizygotic twin correlations. These were used to calculate genetic and shared and nonshared environment estimates.

          Results

          Among 139 publications that were systematically retrieved, data were available on 79 044 twin pairs (31 053 monozygotic and 47 991 dizygotic pairs), 52 independent samples, and 21 countries. Meta-analyses were conducted on psychological traits and developmental milestones from 106 publications organized into 10 categories of functioning, disability, and health. Moderate to high genetic estimates for 8 categories were found, the highest of which was psychomotor functions (pooled h 2 , 0.59; 95% CI, 0.25-0.79; P < .001). Several categories of traits had substantial shared environment estimates, the highest being mental functions of language (pooled c 2 , 0.59; 95% CI, 0.24-0.86; P = .001). All examined categories of traits had moderate or high nonshared environment estimates, the highest of which were emotional functions (pooled e 2 , 0.42; 95% CI, 0.33-0.50; P < .001) and family relationships (pooled e 2 , 0.42; 95% CI, 0.30-0.55; P < .001).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          These findings may be an important source of information to guide future gene discovery research, public perspectives on nature and nurture, and clinical insights into the degree to which family history and environments may estimate major domains of infant functioning, disability, and health in psychological traits and developmental milestones.

          Related collections

          Most cited references168

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Conducting Meta-Analyses inRwith themetaforPackage

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                22 August 2022
                August 2022
                22 August 2022
                : 5
                : 8
                : e2227887
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [3 ]Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: July 5, 2022.
                Published: August 22, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.27887
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2022 Austerberry C et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Authors: Chloe Austerberry, MRes, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom ( c.austerberry@ 123456ucl.ac.uk ); Angelica Ronald, PhD, Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom ( a.ronald@ 123456bbk.ac.uk ).
                Author Contributions: Ms Austerberry had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Drs Fearon and Ronald contributed equally to the manuscript.
                Concept and design: Austerberry, Fearon, Ronald.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Austerberry, Mateen, Fearon.
                Drafting of the manuscript: All authors.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Austerberry, Mateen, Fearon, Ronald.
                Statistical analysis: Austerberry, Mateen, Fearon.
                Obtained funding: Austerberry.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Mateen.
                Supervision: Fearon, Ronald.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Fearon reported receiving an honorarium as deputy editor in chief of the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry outside the submitted work. Dr Ronald reported receiving an honorarium as editor of the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and grants from the Genetics Society and Simons Foundation outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This work was supported by a studentship ES/P000592/1 from the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) awarded to Ms Austerberry by the University College London, Bloomsbury, and East London Doctoral Training Partnership.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Disclaimer: The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of any of the organizations they are affiliated with or funded by.
                Article
                zoi220793
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.27887
                9396365
                35994288
                d4646165-e8b6-4bf7-ae35-350268fa4b2a
                Copyright 2022 Austerberry C et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 4 February 2022
                : 4 July 2022
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Genetics and Genomics

                Comments

                Comment on this article