2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Regions outside of conserved PxxPxR motifs drive the high affinity interaction of GRB2 with SH3 domain ligands

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="P2">SH3 domains are evolutionarily conserved protein interaction domains that control nearly all cellular processes in eukaryotes. The current model is that most SH3 domains bind discreet PxxPxR motifs with weak affinity and relatively low selectivity. However, the interactions of full-length SH3 domain-containing proteins with ligands are highly specific and have much stronger affinity. This suggests that regions outside of PxxPxR motifs drive these interactions. In this study, we observed that PxxPxR motifs were required for the binding of the adaptor protein GRB2 to short peptides from its ligand SOS1. Surprisingly, PxxPxR motifs from the proline rich region of SOS1 or CBL were neither necessary nor sufficient for the <i>in vitro</i> or <i>in vivo</i> interaction with full-length GRB2. Together, our findings show that regions outside of the consensus PxxPxR sites drive the high affinity association of GRB2 with SH3 domain ligands, suggesting that the binding mechanism for this and other SH3 domain interactions may be more complex than originally thought. </p>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research
          Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research
          Elsevier BV
          01674889
          October 2015
          October 2015
          : 1853
          : 10
          : 2560-2569
          Article
          10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.06.002
          4558342
          26079855
          d439b73c-8dde-439b-ac73-5f58271b8bfc
          © 2015

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          https://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article