6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Ritual explained: interdisciplinary answers to Tinbergen's four questions

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Convergent developments across social scientific disciplines provide evidence that rituals are a psychologically prepared and culturally inherited behavioural hallmark of our species. The dramatic diversity of ritual practices ranges from simple greetings to elaborate religious ceremonies, from the benign to life-threatening. Yet our scientific understanding of this core human trait remains limited. Explaining the universality, functionality and diversity of ritual requires insight from multiple disciplines. This special issue integrates research from anthropology, archaeology, biology, primatology, cognitive science, psychology, religious studies and demography to build an interdisciplinary account of ritual. The objective is to contribute to an integrative explanation of ritual by addressing Tinbergen's four key questions. These include answering ultimate questions about the (i) phylogeny and (ii) adaptive functions of ritual; and proximate questions about the (iii) mechanisms and (iv) ontogeny of ritual. The intersection of these four complementary lines of inquiry yields new avenues for theory and research into this fundamental aspect of the human condition, and in so doing, into the coevolution of cognition and culture.

          This article is part of the theme issue ‘Ritual renaissance: new insights into the most human of behaviours’.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Ties That Bind Us

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Searching for Control: Priming Randomness Increases the Evaluation of Ritual Efficacy

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The cultural evolutionary trade-off of ritualistic synchrony

              From Australia to the Arctic, human groups engage in synchronous behaviour during communal rituals. Because ritualistic synchrony is widespread, many argue that it is functional for human groups, encouraging large-scale cooperation and group cohesion. Here, we offer a more nuanced perspective on synchrony's function. We review research on synchrony's prosocial effects, but also discuss synchrony's antisocial effects such as encouraging group conflict, decreasing group creativity and increasing harmful obedience. We further argue that a tightness–looseness (TL) framework helps to explain this trade-off and generates new predictions for how ritualistic synchrony should evolve over time, where it should be most prevalent, and how it should affect group well-being. We close by arguing that synthesizing the literature on TL with the literature on synchrony has promise for understanding synchrony's role in a broader cultural evolutionary framework. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Ritual renaissance: new insights into the most human of behaviours'.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
                Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B
                The Royal Society
                0962-8436
                1471-2970
                August 17 2020
                June 29 2020
                August 17 2020
                : 375
                : 1805
                : 20190419
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Professor of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX 78712, USA
                [2 ]Associate Professor of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia QLD 4072, Australia
                [3 ]Senior Research Associate, Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, Siemert Road Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
                Article
                10.1098/rstb.2019.0419
                7423255
                32594869
                d346d059-3089-49fe-a408-8d0ab38888b0
                © 2020

                https://royalsociety.org/-/media/journals/author/Licence-to-Publish-20062019-final.pdf

                https://royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article