Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Modification of the existing maximum residue levels for fluazifop‐P in various products of plant and animal origin

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In accordance with Article 6 of Regulation ( EC) No 396/2005, the applicant Syngenta Crop Protection AG submitted a request to the competent national authority in Portugal to modify the existing maximum residue levels ( MRL) for the active substance fluazifop‐P in tomato, carrot and courgette. The data submitted in support of the request were found to be sufficient to derive MRL proposals for carrot and courgette. For tomato, data gaps were identified which precluded the derivation of MRL proposal. Adequate analytical methods for enforcement are available to control the residues of fluazifop‐P in plant matrices under consideration. Based on the risk assessment results, EFSA concluded that the short‐term and long‐term intake of residues resulting from the use of fluazifop‐P on carrots and courgettes according to the reported agricultural practices and the products of animal origin under consideration is unlikely to present a risk to consumer health.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Reasoned opinion on the potential chronic and acute risk to consumers health arising from proposed temporary EU MRLs

          (2007)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fluazifop‐P (evaluated variant fluazifop‐P‐butyl)

            (2010)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Reasoned opinion on the review of the existing maximum residue levels for fluazifop‐P according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005

              (2015)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                EFSA J
                EFSA J
                10.1002/(ISSN)1831-4732
                EFS2
                EFSA Journal
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1831-4732
                06 July 2017
                July 2017
                : 15
                : 7 ( doiID: 10.1002/efs2.2017.15.issue-7 )
                : e04871
                Author notes
                Article
                EFS24871
                10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4871
                7010170
                d31377cd-e182-427b-9fdf-08a4b3ca629a
                © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 1, Pages: 31, Words: 12706
                Categories
                Reasoned Opinion
                Reasoned Opinion
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                July 2017
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.5 mode:remove_FC converted:21.01.2020

                fluazifop‐p,carrot,tomato,courgette,pesticide,mrl,consumer risk assessment

                Comments

                Comment on this article