21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Out-of-pocket expenditure for home and facility-based delivery among rural women in Zambia: a mixed-methods, cross-sectional study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Out-of-pocket expenses associated with facility-based deliveries are a well-known barrier to health care access. However, there is extremely limited contemporary information on delivery-related household out-of-pocket expenditure in sub-Saharan Africa. We assess the financial burden of delivery for the most remote Zambian women and compare differences between delivery locations (primary health center, hospital, or home).

          Methods

          We conducted household surveys and in-depth interviews among randomly selected remote Zambian women who delivered a baby within the last 13 months. Women reported expenditures for their most-recent delivery for delivery supplies, transportation, and baby clothes, among others. Expenditures were converted to US dollars for analysis.

          Results

          Of 2280 women sampled, 2223 (97.5%) reported spending money on their delivery. Nearly all respondents in the sample (95.9%) spent money on baby clothes/blanket, while over 80% purchased delivery supplies such as disinfectant or cord clamps, and a third spent on transportation. Women reported spending a mean of USD28.76 on their delivery, with baby clothes/blanket (USD21.46) being the main expenditure and delivery supplies (USD3.81) making up much of the remainder. Compared to women who delivered at home, women who delivered at a primary health center spent nearly USD4 (p<0.001) more for their delivery, while women who delivered at a level 1 or level 2 hospital spent over USD7.50 (p<0.001) more for delivery.

          Conclusion

          These expenses account for approximately one third of the monthly household income of the poorest Zambian households. While the abolition of user fees has reduced the direct costs of delivering at a health facility for the poorest members of society, remote Zambian women still face high out-of-pocket expenses in the form of delivery supplies that facilities should provide as well as unofficial policies/norms requiring women to bring new baby clothes/blanket to a facility-based delivery. Future programs that target these expenses may increase access to facility-based delivery.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Modeling Health Care Expenditures and Use

          Health care expenditures and use are challenging to model because these dependent variables typically have distributions that are skewed with a large mass at zero. In this article, we describe estimation and interpretation of the effects of a natural experiment using two classes of nonlinear statistical models: one for health care expenditures and the other for counts of health care use. We extend prior analyses to test the effect of the ACA's young adult expansion on three different outcomes: total health care expenditures, office-based visits, and emergency department visits. Modeling the outcomes with a two-part or hurdle model, instead of a single-equation model, reveals that the ACA policy increased the number of office-based visits but decreased emergency department visits and overall spending.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            User fee exemptions are not enough: out-of-pocket payments for 'free' delivery services in rural Tanzania.

            To identify the main drivers of costs of facility delivery and the financial consequences for households among rural women in Tanzania, a country with a policy of delivery fee exemptions. We selected a representative sample of households in a rural district in western Tanzania. Women who given birth within 5 years were asked about payments for doctor's/nurse's fees, drugs, non-medical supplies, medical tests, maternity waiting home, transport and other expenses. Wealth was assessed using a household asset index. We estimated the proportion of women who cut down on spending or borrowed money/sold household items to pay for delivery in each wealth group. In all, 73.3% of women with facility delivery reported having made out-of-pocket payments for delivery-related costs. The average cost was 6272 Tanzanian shillings (TZS), [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 4916, 7628] or 5.0 United States dollars. Transport costs (53.6%) and provider fees (26.6%) were the largest cost components in government facilities. Deliveries in mission facilities were twice as expensive as those in government facilities. Nearly half (48.3%) of women reported cutting down on spending or borrowing money/selling household assets to pay for delivery, with the poor reporting this most frequently. Out-of-pocket payments for facility delivery were substantial and were driven by high transport costs, unofficial provider payments, and preference for mission facilities, which levy user charges. Novel approaches to financing maternal health services, such as subsidies for transport and care from private providers, are required to reduce the cost barriers to attended delivery.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Reasons for home delivery and use of traditional birth attendants in rural Zambia: a qualitative study

              Background Despite the policy change stopping traditional birth attendants (TBAs) from conducting deliveries at home and encouraging all women to give birth at the clinic under skilled care, many women still give birth at home and TBAs are essential providers of obstetric care in rural Zambia. The main reasons for pregnant women’s preference for TBAs are not well understood. This qualitative study aimed to identify reasons motivating women to giving birth at home and seek the help of TBAs. This knowledge is important for the design of public health interventions focusing on promoting facility-based skilled birth attendance in Zambia. Methods We conducted ten focus group discussions (n = 100) with women of reproductive age (15–45 years) in five health centre catchment areas with the lowest institutional delivery rates in the district. In addition, a total of 30 in-depth interviews were conducted comprising 5 TBAs, 4 headmen, 4 husbands, 4 mothers, 4 neighbourhood health committee (NHC) members, 4 community health workers (CHWs) and 5 nurses. Perspectives on TBAs, the decision-making process regarding home delivery and use of TBAs, and reasons for preference of TBAs and their services were explored. Results Our findings show that women’s lack of decision- making autonomy regarding child birth, dependence on the husband and other family members for the final decision, and various physical and socioeconomic barriers including long distances, lack of money for transport and the requirement to bring baby clothes and food while staying at the clinic, prevented them from delivering at a clinic. In addition, socio-cultural norms regarding childbirth, negative attitude towards the quality of services provided at the clinic, made most women deliver at home. Moreover, most women had a positive attitude towards TBAs and perceived them to be respectful, skilled, friendly, trustworthy, and available when they needed them. Conclusion Our findings suggest a need to empower women with decision-making skills regarding childbirth and to lower barriers that prevent them from going to the health facility in time. There is also need to improve the quality of existing facility-based delivery services and to strengthen linkages between TBAs and the formal health system.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Womens Health
                Int J Womens Health
                IJWH
                intjwh
                International Journal of Women's Health
                Dove
                1179-1411
                01 August 2019
                2019
                : 11
                : 411-430
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health , Boston, MA, USA
                [2 ] Department of Research, Right to Care Zambia , Lusaka, Zambia
                [3 ] Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center , Boston, MA, USA
                [4 ] School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco , San Francisco, CA, USA
                [5 ] National Health Research Authority, Pediatric Centre of Excellence , Lusaka, Zambia
                [6 ] Department of Research, Office of Global Affairs and Pan American Health Organization/ World Health Organization Collaborating Center, University of Michigan School of Nursing , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Jeanette L KaiserDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health , 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Crosstown Center 3rd Floor, Boston, MA02118, USATel +1 617 358 2221 Email jlkaiser@ 123456bu.edu
                Article
                214081
                10.2147/IJWH.S214081
                6682766
                31447591
                d296c536-4d1c-4e4f-9324-3f469a174072
                © 2019 Kaiser et al.

                This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 01 May 2019
                : 19 June 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 4, References: 50, Pages: 20
                Categories
                Original Research

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                cost,skilled birth attendance,obstetric care,maternal health,social determinants of health,sub-saharan africa

                Comments

                Comment on this article