2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The motivating effect of monetary over psychological incentives is stronger in WEIRD cultures

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Motivating effortful behaviour is a problem employers, governments and nonprofits face globally. However, most studies on motivation are done in Western, educated, industrialized, rich and democratic (WEIRD) cultures. We compared how hard people in six countries worked in response to monetary incentives versus psychological motivators, such as competing with or helping others. The advantage money had over psychological interventions was larger in the United States and the United Kingdom than in China, India, Mexico and South Africa ( N = 8,133). In our last study, we randomly assigned cultural frames through language in bilingual Facebook users in India ( N = 2,065). Money increased effort over a psychological treatment by 27% in Hindi and 52% in English. These findings contradict the standard economic intuition that people from poorer countries should be more driven by money. Instead, they suggest that the market mentality of exchanging time and effort for material benefits is most prominent in WEIRD cultures.

          Abstract

          Monetary incentives were found to be more motivating than psychological interventions for individuals in the United States and the United Kingdom, compared with individuals in China, India, Mexico and South Africa. Among bilinguals on Facebook, money was more motivating in English compared with in Hindi.

          Related collections

          Most cited references135

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The weirdest people in the world?

          Behavioral scientists routinely publish broad claims about human psychology and behavior in the world's top journals based on samples drawn entirely from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) societies. Researchers - often implicitly - assume that either there is little variation across human populations, or that these "standard subjects" are as representative of the species as any other population. Are these assumptions justified? Here, our review of the comparative database from across the behavioral sciences suggests both that there is substantial variability in experimental results across populations and that WEIRD subjects are particularly unusual compared with the rest of the species - frequent outliers. The domains reviewed include visual perception, fairness, cooperation, spatial reasoning, categorization and inferential induction, moral reasoning, reasoning styles, self-concepts and related motivations, and the heritability of IQ. The findings suggest that members of WEIRD societies, including young children, are among the least representative populations one could find for generalizing about humans. Many of these findings involve domains that are associated with fundamental aspects of psychology, motivation, and behavior - hence, there are no obvious a priori grounds for claiming that a particular behavioral phenomenon is universal based on sampling from a single subpopulation. Overall, these empirical patterns suggests that we need to be less cavalier in addressing questions of human nature on the basis of data drawn from this particularly thin, and rather unusual, slice of humanity. We close by proposing ways to structurally re-organize the behavioral sciences to best tackle these challenges.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Culture and Cognition

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                dmedvede@chicagobooth.edu
                Journal
                Nat Hum Behav
                Nat Hum Behav
                Nature Human Behaviour
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2397-3374
                8 January 2024
                8 January 2024
                2024
                : 8
                : 3
                : 456-470
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of Chicago, Booth School of Business, ( https://ror.org/024mw5h28) Chicago, IL USA
                [2 ]Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, ( https://ror.org/00hx57361) Princeton, NJ USA
                [3 ]Yale University, Yale School of Management, ( https://ror.org/03v76x132) New Haven, CT USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8349-5720
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0954-5758
                Article
                1769
                10.1038/s41562-023-01769-5
                10963269
                38191844
                d268f080-8176-48b7-bf48-b51c5fb6c934
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 20 September 2022
                : 25 October 2023
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2024

                human behaviour,business and management
                human behaviour, business and management

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content164

                Most referenced authors952