5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Physiological effects of in ovo delivery of bioactive substances in broiler chickens

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The poultry industry has improved genetics, nutrition, and management practices, resulting in fast-growing chickens; however, disturbances during embryonic development may affect the entire production cycle and cause irreversible losses to broiler chicken producers. The most crucial time in the chicks' development appears to be the perinatal period, which encompasses the last few days of pre-hatch and the first few days of post-hatch. During this critical period, intestinal development occurs rapidly, and the chicks undergo a metabolic and physiological shift from the utilization of egg nutrients to exogenous feed. However, the nutrient reserve of the egg yolk may not be enough to sustain the late stage of embryonic development and provide energy for the hatching process. In addition, modern hatchery practices cause a delay in access to feed immediately post-hatch, and this can potentially affect the intestinal microbiome, health, development, and growth of the chickens. Development of the in ovo technology allowing for the delivery of bioactive substances into chicken embryos during their development represents a way to accommodate the perinatal period, late embryo development, and post-hatch growth. Many bioactive substances have been delivered through the in ovo technology, including carbohydrates, amino acids, hormones, prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics, antibodies, immunostimulants, minerals, and microorganisms with a variety of physiological effects. In this review, we focused on the physiological effects of the in ovo delivery of these substances, including their effects on embryo development, gastrointestinal tract function and health, nutrient digestion, immune system development and function, bone development, overall growth performance, muscle development and meat quality, gastrointestinal tract microbiota development, heat stress response, pathogens exclusion, and birds metabolism, as well as transcriptome and proteome. We believe that this method is widely underestimated and underused by the poultry industry.

          Related collections

          Most cited references222

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics.

          Because the human gut microbiota can play a major role in host health, there is currently some interest in the manipulation of the composition of the gut flora towards a potentially more remedial community. Attempts have been made to increase bacterial groups such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus that are perceived as exerting health-promoting properties. Probiotics, defined as microbial food supplements that beneficially affect the host by improving its intestinal microbial balance, have been used to change the composition of colonic microbiota. However, such changes may be transient, and the implantation of exogenous bacteria therefore becomes limited. In contrast, prebiotics are nondigestible food ingredients that beneficially affect the host by selectively stimulating the growth and/or activity of one or a limited number of bacterial species already resident in the colon, and thus attempt to improve host health. Intake of prebiotics can significantly modulate the colonic microbiota by increasing the number of specific bacteria and thus changing the composition of the microbiota. Nondigestible oligosaccharides in general, and fructooligosaccharides in particular, are prebiotics. They have been shown to stimulate the growth of endogenous bifidobacteria, which, after a short feeding period, become predominant in human feces. Moreover, these prebiotics modulate lipid metabolism, most likely via fermentation products. By combining the rationale of pro- and prebiotics, the concept of synbiotics is proposed to characterize some colonic foods with interesting nutritional properties that make these compounds candidates for classification as health-enhancing functional food ingredients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Interactions of commensal and pathogenic microorganisms with the intestinal mucosal barrier

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Microbiota of the chicken gastrointestinal tract: influence on health, productivity and disease.

              Recent advances in the technology available for culture-independent methods for identification and enumeration of environmental bacteria have invigorated interest in the study of the role of chicken intestinal microbiota in health and productivity. Chickens harbour unique and diverse bacterial communities that include human and animal pathogens. Increasing public concern about the use of antibiotics in the poultry industry has influenced the ways in which poultry producers are working towards improving birds' intestinal health. Effective means of antibiotic-independent pathogen control through competitive exclusion and promotion of good protective microbiota are being actively investigated. With the realisation that just about any change in environment influences the highly responsive microbial communities and with the abandonment of the notion that we can isolate and investigate a single species of interest outside of the community, came a flood of studies that have attempted to profile the intestinal microbiota of chickens under numerous conditions. This review aims to address the main issues in investigating chicken microbiota and to summarise the data acquired to date.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Vet Sci
                Front Vet Sci
                Front. Vet. Sci.
                Frontiers in Veterinary Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2297-1769
                16 March 2023
                2023
                : 10
                : 1124007
                Affiliations
                Animal Biosciences and Biotechnology Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service , Beltsville, MD, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Daniel Hernandez-Patlan, Key Laboratory for Feed Biotechnology, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico

                Reviewed by: Haijun Zhang, Feed Research Institute (CAAS), China; Ali Daneshmand, University of New England, Australia; Margarita A. Arreguin Nava, Independent Researcher, Fayetteville, AR, United States

                *Correspondence: Monika Proszkowiec-Weglarz monika.weglarz@ 123456usda.gov

                This article was submitted to Animal Nutrition and Metabolism, a section of the journal Frontiers in Veterinary Science

                Article
                10.3389/fvets.2023.1124007
                10060894
                37008350
                d23d30ba-3cde-4aaf-8c37-e5c2b4c296df
                Copyright © 2023 Kpodo and Proszkowiec-Weglarz.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 14 December 2022
                : 14 February 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 222, Pages: 18, Words: 18699
                Funding
                The study was funded by the in-house CRIP project # 8042-31000-114-00D.
                Categories
                Veterinary Science
                Review

                in ovo,nutrition,growth,microbiota,gastrointestinal tract,chicken

                Comments

                Comment on this article