6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The risk of oesophago-gastric cancer in symptomatic patients in primary care: a large case–control study using electronic records

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Over 15 000 new oesophago-gastric cancers are diagnosed annually in the United Kingdom, with most being advanced disease. We identified and quantified features of this cancer in primary care.

          Methods:

          Case–control study using electronic primary-care records of the UK patients aged ⩾40 years was performed. Cases with primary oesophago-gastric cancer were matched to controls on age, sex and practice. Putative features of cancer were identified in the year before diagnosis. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for these features using conditional logistic regression, and positive predictive values (PPVs) were calculated.

          Results:

          A total of 7471 cases and 32 877 controls were studied. Sixteen features were independently associated with oesophago-gastric cancer (all P<0.001): dysphagia, OR 139 (95% confidence interval 112–173); reflux, 5.7 (4.8–6.8); abdominal pain, 2.6 (2.3–3.0); epigastric pain, 8.8 (7.0–11.0); dyspepsia, 6 (5.1–7.1); nausea and/or vomiting, 4.9 (4.0–6.0); constipation, 1.5 (1.2–1.7); chest pain, 1.6 (1.4–1.9); weight loss, 8.9 (7.1–11.2); thrombocytosis, 2.4 (2.0–2.9); low haemoglobin, 2.4 (2.1–2.7); low MCV, 5.2 (4.2–6.4); high inflammatory markers, 1.7 (1.4–2.0); raised hepatic enzymes, 1.3 (1.2–1.5); high white cell count, 1.4 (1.2–1.7); and high cholesterol, 0.8 (0.7–0.8). The only PPV >5% in patients ⩾55 years was for dysphagia. In patients <55 years, all PPVs were <1%.

          Conclusion:

          Symptoms of oesophago-gastric cancer reported in secondary care were also important in primary care. The results should inform guidance and commissioning policy for upper GI endoscopy.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Br J Cancer
          Br. J. Cancer
          British Journal of Cancer
          Nature Publishing Group
          0007-0920
          1532-1827
          15 January 2013
          20 December 2012
          : 108
          : 1
          : 25-31
          Affiliations
          [1 ]School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol , Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK
          [2 ]School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol , 69 St Michael's Hill, Bristol BS2 8DZ, UK
          [3 ]North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University , Gwenfro 5, Wrexham Technology Park, Wrexham LL13 7YP, UK
          [4 ]Department of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford , 23-28 Hythe Bridge Street, Oxford OX1 2ET, UK
          [5 ]Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site , Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK
          [6 ]Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, Veysey Building , Exeter, EX2 4SG, UK
          Author notes
          Article
          bjc2012551
          10.1038/bjc.2012.551
          3553533
          23257895
          d1abfd06-dce0-4a24-b6ff-16dfa1d8d2fe
          Copyright © 2013 Cancer Research UK

          From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

          History
          : 20 August 2012
          : 06 November 2012
          : 19 November 2012
          Categories
          Clinical Study

          Oncology & Radiotherapy
          oesophago-gastric cancer,primary care,symptoms,diagnosis,positive predictive values

          Comments

          Comment on this article