Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Color aberration in malachite kingfishers: Insights from community science observations in Queen Elizabeth National Park, Uganda

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Color aberrations in birds corresponds with important ecological functions, including thermoregulation and physiological impacts, camouflage and increased predation, and social interactions with conspecifics. Color aberrations in birds have been reported frequently in the scientific literature, but aberrations in many species remain undocumented or understudied. We investigated records of leucism in malachite kingfishers ( Corythornis cristatus) from observations of community scientists on iNaturalist and eBird in Uganda. Leucistic kingfishers were only observed within the Queen Elizabeth National Park (QENP), Uganda. When considering all observations of malachite kingfishers that included photographs within the QENP, leucistic individuals accounted for 13.0% and 10.4% of total malachite kingfisher observations within the study area from iNaturalist and eBird, respectively. Leucistic observations were recorded from September 2015 through February 2017, making up 60.0% and 68.2% of observations of malachite kingfishers within the study area from iNaturalist and eBird during that time, respectively. The localized and short documentation period suggests observations represent a single individual, while the high observation rate likely corresponds with collection bias due to the novelty of the individual. Our findings help to better understand the ecological importance and potential consequences for color‐aberrant individuals, although color aberration did not appear to inhibit our subject's ability to find a mate. Our work also highlights how participatory science can promote the documentation of color‐aberrant individuals in wild populations, although it poses challenges when trying to estimate abundance.

          Abstract

          We investigated records of hypopigmentation in malachite kingfishers (Corythornis cristatus) from observations of community scientists on iNaturalist and eBird in Uganda. Hypopigmented individuals accounted for 13.0% and 10.4% of total malachite kingfisher observations within the study area from iNaturalist and eBird, respectively; but from September 2015 through February 2017, hypopigmented individuals made up 60.0% and 68.2% of observations. The localized and short documentation period suggests observations represent a single individual, while the high observation rate likely corresponds with collection bias due to the novelty of the individual.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The eBird enterprise: An integrated approach to development and application of citizen science

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Melanin and the Abrasion Resistance of Feathers

            (1995)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Patterns of contribution to citizen science biodiversity projects increase understanding of volunteers’ recording behaviour

              The often opportunistic nature of biological recording via citizen science leads to taxonomic, spatial and temporal biases which add uncertainty to biodiversity estimates. However, such biases may also give valuable insight into volunteers’ recording behaviour. Using Greater London as a case-study we examined the composition of three citizen science datasets – from Greenspace Information for Greater London CIC, iSpot and iRecord - with respect to recorder contribution and spatial and taxonomic biases, i.e. when, where and what volunteers record. We found most volunteers contributed few records and were active for just one day. Each dataset had its own taxonomic and spatial signature suggesting that volunteers’ personal recording preferences may attract them towards particular schemes. There were also patterns across datasets: species’ abundance and ease of identification were positively associated with number of records, as was plant height. We found clear hotspots of recording activity, the 10 most popular sites containing open water. We note that biases are accrued as part of the recording process (e.g. species’ detectability) as well as from volunteer preferences. An increased understanding of volunteer behaviour gained from analysing the composition of records could thus enhance the fit between volunteers’ interests and the needs of scientific projects.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                bwarner4@illinois.edu
                Journal
                Ecol Evol
                Ecol Evol
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7758
                ECE3
                Ecology and Evolution
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7758
                07 July 2024
                July 2024
                : 14
                : 7 ( doiID: 10.1002/ece3.v14.7 )
                : e11717
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural, Consumer, and Environmental Science University of Illinois Champaign Illinois USA
                [ 2 ] School of Life Sciences Arizona State University Tempe Arizona USA
                [ 3 ] Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute University of Illinois Champaign Illinois USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Bethany H. Warner, Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural, Consumer, and Environmental Science, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL, USA.

                Email: bwarner4@ 123456illinois.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6795-6858
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0034-2460
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8976-889X
                Article
                ECE311717 ECE-2024-05-01004.R1
                10.1002/ece3.11717
                11228083
                38979001
                d192c568-04ca-4aaf-ae0b-ee4b3a9b8f88
                © 2024 The Author(s). Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 21 June 2024
                : 20 May 2024
                : 26 June 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 1, Pages: 6, Words: 4300
                Categories
                Behavioural Ecology
                Evolutionary Ecology
                Zoology
                Nature Notes
                Nature Notes
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                July 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.4.5 mode:remove_FC converted:08.07.2024

                Evolutionary Biology
                corythornis cristatus,hypopigmentation,kingfisher,leucism,participatory science,queen elizabeth national park

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content164

                Most referenced authors282