Role of water in metal catalyst performance for ketone hydrogenation: a joint experimental and theoretical study on levulinic acid conversion into gamma-valerolactone

Author(s): Carine Michel ¹ ^, ² ^, ³ ^, ⁴ ^, ⁵ , Jérémie Zaffran ¹ ^, ² ^, ³ ^, ⁴ ^, ⁵ , Agnieszka M. Ruppert ⁶ ^, ⁷ ^, ⁸ ^, ⁹ , Joanna Matras-Michalska ⁶ ^, ⁷ ^, ⁸ ^, ⁹ , Marcin Jędrzejczyk ⁶ ^, ⁷ ^, ⁸ ^, ⁹ , Jacek Grams ⁶ ^, ⁷ ^, ⁸ ^, ⁹ , Philippe Sautet ¹ ^, ² ^, ³ ^, ⁴ ^, ⁵

Publication date (Electronic): 2014

Journal: Chem. Commun.

Publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisher

Bookmark

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Water is essential to attain good performance in a hydrogenation reaction with a ruthenium catalyst.

Abstract

While Ru is a poor hydrogenation catalyst compared to Pt or Pd in the gas phase, it is efficient under aqueous phase conditions in the hydrogenation of ketones such as the conversion of levulinic acid into gamma-valerolactone. Combining DFT calculations and experiments, we demonstrate that water is responsible for the enhanced reactivity of Ru under those conditions.

Related collections

Most cited references 22

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

Catalytic conversion of biomass to biofuels

David Alonso, Jesse Q. Bond, James Dumesic (2010)

0 comments Cited 488 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

How to conceptualize catalytic cycles? The energetic span model.

Sebastian Kozuch, Sason Shaik (2011)

A computational study of a catalytic cycle generates state energies (the E-representation), whereas experiments lead to rate constants (the k-representation). Based on transition state theory (TST), these are equivalent representations. Nevertheless, until recently, there has been no simple way to calculate the efficiency of a catalytic cycle, that is, its turnover frequency (TOF), from a theoretically obtained energy profile. In this Account, we introduce the energetic span model that enables one to evaluate TOFs in a straightforward manner and in affinity with the Curtin-Hammett principle. As shown herein, the model implies a change in our kinetic concepts. Analogous to Ohm's law, the catalytic chemical current (the TOF) can be defined by a chemical potential (independent of the mechanism) divided by a chemical resistance (dependent on the mechanism and the nature of the catalyst). This formulation is based on Eyring's TST and corresponds to a steady-state regime. In many catalytic cycles, only one transition state and one intermediate determine the TOF. We call them the TOF-determining transition state (TDTS) and the TOF-determining intermediate (TDI). These key states can be located, from among the many states available to a catalytic cycle, by assessing the degree of TOF control (X(TOF)); this last term resembles the structure-reactivity coefficient in classical physical organic chemistry. The TDTS-TDI energy difference and the reaction driving force define the energetic span (δE) of the cycle. Whenever the TDTS appears after the TDI, δE is the energy difference between these two states; when the opposite is true, we must also add the driving force to this difference. Having δE, the TOF is expressed simply in the Arrhenius-Eyring fashion, wherein δE serves as the apparent activation energy of the cycle. An important lesson from this model is that neither one transition state nor one reaction step possess all the kinetic information that determines the efficiency of a catalyst. Additionally, the TDI and TDTS are not necessarily the highest and lowest states, nor do they have to be adjoined as a single step. As such, we can conclude that a change in the conceptualization of catalytic cycles is in order: in catalysis, there are no rate-determining steps, but rather rate-determining states. We also include a study on the effect of reactant and product concentrations. In the energetic span approximation, only the reactants or products that are located between the TDI and TDTS accelerate or inhibit the reaction. In this manner, the energetic span model creates a direct link between experimental quantities and theoretical results. The versatility of the energetic span model is demonstrated with several catalytic cycles of organometallic reactions.