0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Check of APpropriaTeness of Antimicrobial therapy In Nursing homes (CAPTAIN):a point prevalence study in Belgium

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          The overall prevalence of antimicrobial therapy (AMT) in nursing homes is well described. However, less is known about the appropriateness of AMT in nursing home residents. Therefore, the Check of APpropriaTeness of antimicrobial therapy in nursing homes (CAPTAIN) study aimed to assess both prevalence and appropriateness of AMT in Belgian nursing homes.

          Methods

          In a prospective, observational, point prevalence study, researchers documented prevalence and identified potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) by evaluating accordance of AMT with national guidelines. The severity of inappropriateness was assessed by a modified Delphi expert panel.

          Results

          Eleven nursing homes, including 1178 residents, participated in this study. On the survey day, 8.0% of residents took systemic AMT, primarily for urinary tract infections (54.2%), respiratory tract infections (36.5%), and skin and skin-structure infections (6.3%). About half of these prescriptions were used in prophylaxis (52.1%). Registration of indication and stop date was missing in 58.3% and 56.3% of AMTs, respectively. In 89.6% of the systemic AMTs, at least one discordance with national guidelines was identified, resulting in a total of 171 PIPs, with 49 unique PIPs. Of all unique PIPs, 26.5% were assessed with a high severity score (≥4). According to the expert panel, most inappropriate practice was starting AMT for cough without other symptoms. Inappropriate timing of time-dependent AMTs was common, but assessed as ‘moderately severe’. One-third of systemic AMT exceeded the recommended duration.

          Conclusions

          AMT in nursing homes is often not prescribed according to national guidelines, highlighting the need for future interventions to promote the rational use of AMT in this setting.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis

          (2022)
          Summary Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a major threat to human health around the world. Previous publications have estimated the effect of AMR on incidence, deaths, hospital length of stay, and health-care costs for specific pathogen–drug combinations in select locations. To our knowledge, this study presents the most comprehensive estimates of AMR burden to date. Methods We estimated deaths and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) attributable to and associated with bacterial AMR for 23 pathogens and 88 pathogen–drug combinations in 204 countries and territories in 2019. We obtained data from systematic literature reviews, hospital systems, surveillance systems, and other sources, covering 471 million individual records or isolates and 7585 study-location-years. We used predictive statistical modelling to produce estimates of AMR burden for all locations, including for locations with no data. Our approach can be divided into five broad components: number of deaths where infection played a role, proportion of infectious deaths attributable to a given infectious syndrome, proportion of infectious syndrome deaths attributable to a given pathogen, the percentage of a given pathogen resistant to an antibiotic of interest, and the excess risk of death or duration of an infection associated with this resistance. Using these components, we estimated disease burden based on two counterfactuals: deaths attributable to AMR (based on an alternative scenario in which all drug-resistant infections were replaced by drug-susceptible infections), and deaths associated with AMR (based on an alternative scenario in which all drug-resistant infections were replaced by no infection). We generated 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) for final estimates as the 25th and 975th ordered values across 1000 posterior draws, and models were cross-validated for out-of-sample predictive validity. We present final estimates aggregated to the global and regional level. Findings On the basis of our predictive statistical models, there were an estimated 4·95 million (3·62–6·57) deaths associated with bacterial AMR in 2019, including 1·27 million (95% UI 0·911–1·71) deaths attributable to bacterial AMR. At the regional level, we estimated the all-age death rate attributable to resistance to be highest in western sub-Saharan Africa, at 27·3 deaths per 100 000 (20·9–35·3), and lowest in Australasia, at 6·5 deaths (4·3–9·4) per 100 000. Lower respiratory infections accounted for more than 1·5 million deaths associated with resistance in 2019, making it the most burdensome infectious syndrome. The six leading pathogens for deaths associated with resistance (Escherichia coli, followed by Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) were responsible for 929 000 (660 000–1 270 000) deaths attributable to AMR and 3·57 million (2·62–4·78) deaths associated with AMR in 2019. One pathogen–drug combination, meticillin-resistant S aureus, caused more than 100 000 deaths attributable to AMR in 2019, while six more each caused 50 000–100 000 deaths: multidrug-resistant excluding extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis, third-generation cephalosporin-resistant E coli, carbapenem-resistant A baumannii, fluoroquinolone-resistant E coli, carbapenem-resistant K pneumoniae, and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant K pneumoniae. Interpretation To our knowledge, this study provides the first comprehensive assessment of the global burden of AMR, as well as an evaluation of the availability of data. AMR is a leading cause of death around the world, with the highest burdens in low-resource settings. Understanding the burden of AMR and the leading pathogen–drug combinations contributing to it is crucial to making informed and location-specific policy decisions, particularly about infection prevention and control programmes, access to essential antibiotics, and research and development of new vaccines and antibiotics. There are serious data gaps in many low-income settings, emphasising the need to expand microbiology laboratory capacity and data collection systems to improve our understanding of this important human health threat. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, and Department of Health and Social Care using UK aid funding managed by the Fleming Fund.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            What are Delphi studies?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Current and Emerging Topical Antibacterials and Antiseptics: Agents, Action, and Resistance Patterns.

              Bacterial skin infections represent some of the most common infectious diseases globally. Prevention and treatment of skin infections can involve application of a topical antimicrobial, which may be an antibiotic (such as mupirocin or fusidic acid) or an antiseptic (such as chlorhexidine or alcohol). However, there is limited evidence to support the widespread prophylactic or therapeutic use of topical agents. Challenges involved in the use of topical antimicrobials include increasing rates of bacterial resistance, local hypersensitivity reactions (particularly to older agents, such as bacitracin), and concerns about the indiscriminate use of antiseptics potentially coselecting for antibiotic resistance. We review the evidence for the major clinical uses of topical antibiotics and antiseptics. In addition, we review the mechanisms of action of common topical agents and define the clinical and molecular epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in these agents. Moreover, we review the potential use of newer and emerging agents, such as retapamulin and ebselen, and discuss the role of antiseptic agents in preventing bacterial skin infections. A comprehensive understanding of the clinical efficacy and drivers of resistance to topical agents will inform the optimal use of these agents to preserve their activity in the future.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JAC Antimicrob Resist
                JAC Antimicrob Resist
                jacamr
                JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
                Oxford University Press (UK )
                2632-1823
                August 2024
                06 July 2024
                06 July 2024
                : 6
                : 4
                : dlae101
                Affiliations
                KU Leuven, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences , Leuven, Belgium
                University Hospitals Leuven, Pharmacy Department , Leuven, Belgium
                KU Leuven, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences , Leuven, Belgium
                University Hospitals Leuven, Pharmacy Department , Leuven, Belgium
                KU Leuven, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences , Leuven, Belgium
                University Hospitals Leuven, Pharmacy Department , Leuven, Belgium
                KU Leuven, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences , Leuven, Belgium
                KU Leuven, Department of Public Health and Primary Care , Leuven, Belgium
                KU Leuven, Department of Public Health and Primary Care , Leuven, Belgium
                Sciensano, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health , Brussels, Belgium
                University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Infection Control and Epidemiology , Leuven, Belgium
                KU Leuven, Department of Public Health and Primary Care , Leuven, Belgium
                University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Infection Control and Epidemiology , Leuven, Belgium
                University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Infection Control and Epidemiology , Leuven, Belgium
                University Hospitals Leuven, Pharmacy Department , Leuven, Belgium
                Author notes
                Corresponding author. E-mail: indira.coenen@ 123456kuleuven.be

                Lotte Vander Elst shared first authors.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4772-0542
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6342-0676
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1378-3772
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4053-3915
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6152-2134
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9113-7712
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6900-1974
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6072-2596
                Article
                dlae101
                10.1093/jacamr/dlae101
                11227214
                38974942
                d12f826c-8241-4d11-b9f1-0b3e26ec5245
                © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.

                History
                : 17 April 2024
                : 13 June 2024
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Funding
                Funded by: Research Foundation Flanders, DOI 10.13039/501100003130;
                Award ID: 98649
                Categories
                Original Article
                AcademicSubjects/MED00740
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01150

                Comments

                Comment on this article