6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association between resilience and advance care planning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Advance care planning (ACP) is essential for end-of-life care, especially during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and resilience is critical to deal with pandemic-related stressors. Therefore, we investigated the association between resilience ability and ACP discussions during the COVID-19 pandemic. A nationwide web-based survey was conducted in July 2021 in Japan. We analyzed the respondents’ ability to bounce back from stress (bouncing-back ability), positive stress coping (e.g., “seeking social support”, “planning”), and negative stress coping (e.g., “avoidance”, “alcohol and drug use”) in relation to ACP discussions using multivariable logistic regression models. In total, 2000 responses (86% participation rate) were received (mean age: 51.8 ± 16.7). Normal and high bouncing-back ability (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.03–2.79; AOR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.18–3.65, respectively) were significantly associated with the occurrence of ACP discussions. Seeking social support and planning were significantly associated with ACP discussions, whereas avoidance and alcohol and drug use were not. Both bouncing-back ability and positive stress coping were significantly associated with the occurrence of ACP discussions during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. These findings could be useful for aiding health-care providers involved in ACP discussions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC).

          Resilience may be viewed as a measure of stress coping ability and, as such, could be an important target of treatment in anxiety, depression, and stress reactions. We describe a new rating scale to assess resilience. The Connor-Davidson Resilience scale (CD-RISC) comprises of 25 items, each rated on a 5-point scale (0-4), with higher scores reflecting greater resilience. The scale was administered to subjects in the following groups: community sample, primary care outpatients, general psychiatric outpatients, clinical trial of generalized anxiety disorder, and two clinical trials of PTSD. The reliability, validity, and factor analytic structure of the scale were evaluated, and reference scores for study samples were calculated. Sensitivity to treatment effects was examined in subjects from the PTSD clinical trials. The scale demonstrated good psychometric properties and factor analysis yielded five factors. A repeated measures ANOVA showed that an increase in CD-RISC score was associated with greater improvement during treatment. Improvement in CD-RISC score was noted in proportion to overall clinical global improvement, with greatest increase noted in subjects with the highest global improvement and deterioration in CD-RISC score in those with minimal or no global improvement. The CD-RISC has sound psychometric properties and distinguishes between those with greater and lesser resilience. The scale demonstrates that resilience is modifiable and can improve with treatment, with greater improvement corresponding to higher levels of global improvement. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)

            Analogous to checklists of recommendations such as the CONSORT statement (for randomized trials), or the QUORUM statement (for systematic reviews), which are designed to ensure the quality of reports in the medical literature, a checklist of recommendations for authors is being presented by the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) in an effort to ensure complete descriptions of Web-based surveys. Papers on Web-based surveys reported according to the CHERRIES statement will give readers a better understanding of the sample (self-)selection and its possible differences from a “representative” sample. It is hoped that author adherence to the checklist will increase the usefulness of such reports.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back.

              While resilience has been defined as resistance to illness, adaptation, and thriving, the ability to bounce back or recover from stress is closest to its original meaning. Previous resilience measures assess resources that may promote resilience rather than recovery, resistance, adaptation, or thriving. To test a new brief resilience scale. The brief resilience scale (BRS) was created to assess the ability to bounce back or recover from stress. Its psychometric characteristics were examined in four samples, including two student samples and samples with cardiac and chronic pain patients. The BRS was reliable and measured as a unitary construct. It was predictably related to personal characteristics, social relations, coping, and health in all samples. It was negatively related to anxiety, depression, negative affect, and physical symptoms when other resilience measures and optimism, social support, and Type D personality (high negative affect and high social inhibition) were controlled. There were large differences in BRS scores between cardiac patients with and without Type D and women with and without fibromyalgia. The BRS is a reliable means of assessing resilience as the ability to bounce back or recover from stress and may provide unique and important information about people coping with health-related stressors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jun-miya@umin.ac.jp
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                25 January 2023
                25 January 2023
                2023
                : 13
                : 1371
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.411582.b, ISNI 0000 0001 1017 9540, Department of General Medicine, Shirakawa Satellite for Teaching And Research (STAR), , Fukushima Medical University, ; 2-1, Toyochikamiyajiro, Shirakawa, Fukushima 961-0005 Japan
                [2 ]GRID grid.412379.a, ISNI 0000 0001 0029 3630, Center for University-Wide Education, School of Health and Social Services, , Saitama Prefectural University, ; Saitama, Japan
                [3 ]GRID grid.471467.7, ISNI 0000 0004 0449 2946, Department of General Internal Medicine, , Fukushima Medical University Hospital, ; Fukushima, Fukushima Japan
                [4 ]GRID grid.258799.8, ISNI 0000 0004 0372 2033, Section of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, , Kyoto University, ; Kyoto, Japan
                [5 ]GRID grid.21107.35, ISNI 0000 0001 2171 9311, Department of Health Policy and Management, , Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, ; Baltimore, MD USA
                Article
                28663
                10.1038/s41598-023-28663-4
                9876997
                36697479
                d08e8adc-fad1-4d22-8daf-c8fbae397e55
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 11 February 2022
                : 23 January 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: Unrestricted research funding from JA Fukushima Koseiren (The Fukushima Prefectural Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives for Health and Welfare)
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Uncategorized
                human behaviour,outcomes research,palliative care
                Uncategorized
                human behaviour, outcomes research, palliative care

                Comments

                Comment on this article