26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ambient air pollution and Alzheimer’s disease: the role of the composition of fine particles

      article-commentary

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ambient air pollution is the most important environmental risk factor globally due to its well-established burden of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases (1). Within the complex mixture of polluted ambient air, fine ambient particles defined as mass of particles smaller or equal to 2.5 µm in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) are an established causal factor. Epidemiological evidence is accumulating that PM2.5 is linked to cognitive decline (2, 3). Recent evidence highlighted that PM2.5 is also associated with neurodegenerative diseases, specifically with Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease (4). In this issue of the journal, Shi et al. investigated the association between constituents of PM2.5 and the incidence of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease (5). Their analyses are based on a cohort assembled from the Medicare and Medicaid records including all inhabitants of the contiguous United States aged 65 y and older for the time period 2000 to 2017. They constructed two separate cohorts: They identified 5.8 Mio cases of incident dementia among 18.5 Mio individuals and 2.8 Mio cases of incident Alzheimer’s disease among 19.2 Mio individuals. They report consistent associations for constituents of PM2.5, namely black carbon, organic matter, sulfates (SO4 2−), and ammonium (NH4 +). They conclude that annual average PM2.5 concentrations from traffic and fossil fuel combustion are significantly associated with the development of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease (5). PM2.5 is a complex mixture both with respect to their size ranging down to several nanometers and their composition (6). The composition of combustion-related particles is determined by three factors, the composition of the fuel, the chemical reactions when forming the primary particles, and the substances that are absorbed on the particle surfaces while being dispersed in air. The constituents of PM2.5 assessed by Shi et al. (5) describe the sources of the particles and the toxicological properties. Black carbon is a measure of soot particles produced in combustion processes. As primary particles, they are part of the ultrafine particles (UFP) defined as particles smaller than 100 nm. In this size range, they are characterized by high number concentration and surface area. Particles agglomerate as they age, so that primary ultrafine particles grow into the fine particle fraction. The majority of sulfates, nitrates, and ammonium in PM2.5 are secondary constituents formed from their gaseous precursors and absorbed on the particles. Their concentrations have been consistently associated with adverse health effects, while the toxicity of these constituents is low (6). They are indicators for combustion-related, aged, and regionally transported PM2.5. Shi et al. have used two independent approaches to characterize the spatial variation of annual averages of PM2.5 constituents (5). First, they estimated the annual averages based on an integrated approach combing satellite data, chemical transport models, and ground-based observation with a resolution of 1 km by 1 km. Second, they estimated the annual averages based on nearly 1,000 measurement stations and hundreds of additional predictor variables with a resolution of 50 m by 50 m in urban areas and 1 km by 1 km in rural areas. Both methods yielded comparable correlations between the PM2.5 constituents and PM2.5 mass. The resulting spatial maps provide comparable spatial distributions for all constituents but black carbon. For black carbon, the method relying on chemical transport models assigned the largest values to the industrial southeast and suggests long-range transport of soot-containing particles. In contrast, the method putting most weight on measured constituents implicated that the metropolitan areas had the highest annual averages of black carbon. A key finding of the study by Shi et al (5) is that the hazard ratio for dementia increased 12% (95% CI: 11 to 14%) per 1 µg/m3 black carbon for the chemical transport-based model and 25% (95% CI: 22 to 27%) per 1 µg/m3 black carbon for the second model with finer spatial resolution. The hazard ratio for Alzheimer’s disease increased 23% (95% CI: 21 to 25%) per 1 µg/m3 black carbon for the for the chemical transport-based model and 39% (95% CI: 36 to 43%) based on the second model with finer spatial resolution. The estimates based on the second model with finer resolution are robust against adjustments for the remaining variation in PM2.5 mass. The estimates based on chemical transport-based model are reduced to a null effect when adjusting for the remaining variation in PM2.5 mass. This highlights two important points: First, the observed associations are to a large degree driven by Alzheimer’s disease, and second, the second model captures the role of locally emitted soot particles better than the chemical transport-based model. Considering sulfates as a key indicator for regionally transported, aged PM2.5, the differences are less striking. One µg/m3 SO4 2− is associated with an increased hazard ratio for dementia of 5.9 % (95% CI: 5.6 to 6.2%) based on the chemical transport-based model and of 6.2 % (95% CI: 5.8 to 6.5%) based on the second model with finer spatial resolution. The risk for Alzheimer’s disease associated with an increase of 1 µg/m3 SO4 2 was estimated to be 7.4 % (95% CI: 6.9 to 7.9%) based on the chemical transport-based model and 8.4 % (95% CI: 7.9 to 9.0%) based on the second model with finer resolution. These findings imply that first, the observed increased risks are attributable to Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias and second, both models derive consistent results for regionally transported fine particles. There are multiple ways how fine particles and their constituents are hypothesized to impact the brain and initiate and promote neurodegenerative diseases (Fig. 1). Particles are deposited in the upper and lower airways and reach the lung as well as the gastrointestinal tract (Fig. 1: 1 to 4). UFP are able to enter into cells (7, 8) and to reach the brain via the olfactory nerve (8) (Fig. 1:1). Consequently, UFP could contribute to Alzheimer’s disease development by translocation to the cortex regions where Alzheimer’s disease is initiated (9, 10) (Fig. 1:8). Alzheimer’s disease is characterized by progression of protein miss-folding and plaques that start to develop in distinct brain regions before the entire cortex is affected. Indeed, animal experiments with diesel exhaust containing high numbers of UFP showed protein miss-folding and plaques in addition to oxidative stress (11). By these mechanisms, UFP could contribute to the observed Alzheimer’s disease-specific associations of black carbon by Shi et al. (5). Furthermore, UFP and other constituents of PM2.5 such as transition metals or semivolatile organic compounds translocate from the lung or the gastrointestinal tract to the bloodstream and reach the brain vasculature (Fig. 1:5 to 8). It has been demonstrated by experimental studies that UFP are able to pass the blood–brain-barrier (12). Thereby, more diffuse impacts including microglia activation and reactive astrocytes inducing neuronal inflammation and degeneration as well as oligodendrocyte dysfunction have been described (13). Promotion of neurodegeneration in the entire brain including the cortex would be a consequence (Fig. 1:8). This would be consistent with the finding that aged and regionally transported PM2.5 is robustly associated with dementia and Alzheimer’s disease (5). Further support is provided by a study in children and young adults from Mexico City. (14). UFP were detected along with evidence for neurovascular damage in several brain regions using imaging modalities such as transmission electron microscopy. Furthermore, inflammatory processes induced by PM2.5 in multiple barrier organs could result in systemic oxidative stress and inflammation (Fig. 1:5). Systemic oxidative stress and inflammation are among the hallmarks of environmental insults (15) and could thereby contribute to the progression of dementia. We recently demonstrated the impact of PM2.5 on the gut microbiome (16) (Fig. 1:4), and in general, the gut–brain axis is discussed as relevant for dementia development and progression (17). Finally, a robust association has been documented between PM2.5 and vascular dysfunction (18). Therefore, it is also plausible that PM2.5 impairs endothelia in the brain and induces vascular dementia (Fig. 1:8). Taken together, the hypothesized pathways could promote various types of dementia (10, 17). Fig. 1. Schematic overview on ambient fine and ultrafine particle deposition and interaction with organs and the circulation contributing to the development and progression of dementia and neurodegeneration. Orange lines and arrows: Particle paths through the upper airways into the lung. Dark red lines: Particle paths through the esophagus into the gastrointestinal tract. Gray lines and arrows: Paths of ultrafine particles and constituents from the barrier organs to the brain. “In PNAS, Shi et al. investigated the association between constituents of PM2.5 and the incidence of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease.” There is the need for experimental studies to pursue these aspects further. In particular, toxicological studies are needed to understand the role of UFP and constituents of PM2.5 for initiation and progression of dementia including Alzheimer’s disease. Within epidemiological studies, measuring the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia is a challenge. There is evidence for substantial misclassification and late detection of the disease. However, using the nationwide Medicare and Medicaid data provides a comprehensive and consistent approach. It is unlikely that a large proportion of the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease are captured. To further advance the understanding, large prospective population-based cohorts are needed including longitudinal brain imaging, cognitive function assessments, biomarker measurements, and genotyping to advance the understanding of Alzheimer’s disease initiation and progression by environmental factors such as air pollution. The population around the world is growing and aging. Consequently, age-related diseases are increasing globally. Today, Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias are globally the seventh leading cause of mortality according to the World Health Organization (19). Of the approximately 55 Mio cases, 60 to 70% are Alzheimer’s disease. These numbers highlight that the paper by Shi et al. (5) has important implications for regulatory action. The finding that black carbon particles per µg/m3 have an approximately 10-fold larger effect size than the PM2.5 mixture calls for action to further limit emissions of soot particles from their sources. It also calls in my mind for intensified monitoring of ultrafine particles. The finding that aged regional transported particles are associated with dementia including Alzheimer’s disease strongly highlights that air pollution mitigation strategies need to be part of regional and national agendas.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

          Summary Background Rigorous analysis of levels and trends in exposure to leading risk factors and quantification of their effect on human health are important to identify where public health is making progress and in which cases current efforts are inadequate. The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2019 provides a standardised and comprehensive assessment of the magnitude of risk factor exposure, relative risk, and attributable burden of disease. Methods GBD 2019 estimated attributable mortality, years of life lost (YLLs), years of life lived with disability (YLDs), and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 87 risk factors and combinations of risk factors, at the global level, regionally, and for 204 countries and territories. GBD uses a hierarchical list of risk factors so that specific risk factors (eg, sodium intake), and related aggregates (eg, diet quality), are both evaluated. This method has six analytical steps. (1) We included 560 risk–outcome pairs that met criteria for convincing or probable evidence on the basis of research studies. 12 risk–outcome pairs included in GBD 2017 no longer met inclusion criteria and 47 risk–outcome pairs for risks already included in GBD 2017 were added based on new evidence. (2) Relative risks were estimated as a function of exposure based on published systematic reviews, 81 systematic reviews done for GBD 2019, and meta-regression. (3) Levels of exposure in each age-sex-location-year included in the study were estimated based on all available data sources using spatiotemporal Gaussian process regression, DisMod-MR 2.1, a Bayesian meta-regression method, or alternative methods. (4) We determined, from published trials or cohort studies, the level of exposure associated with minimum risk, called the theoretical minimum risk exposure level. (5) Attributable deaths, YLLs, YLDs, and DALYs were computed by multiplying population attributable fractions (PAFs) by the relevant outcome quantity for each age-sex-location-year. (6) PAFs and attributable burden for combinations of risk factors were estimated taking into account mediation of different risk factors through other risk factors. Across all six analytical steps, 30 652 distinct data sources were used in the analysis. Uncertainty in each step of the analysis was propagated into the final estimates of attributable burden. Exposure levels for dichotomous, polytomous, and continuous risk factors were summarised with use of the summary exposure value to facilitate comparisons over time, across location, and across risks. Because the entire time series from 1990 to 2019 has been re-estimated with use of consistent data and methods, these results supersede previously published GBD estimates of attributable burden. Findings The largest declines in risk exposure from 2010 to 2019 were among a set of risks that are strongly linked to social and economic development, including household air pollution; unsafe water, sanitation, and handwashing; and child growth failure. Global declines also occurred for tobacco smoking and lead exposure. The largest increases in risk exposure were for ambient particulate matter pollution, drug use, high fasting plasma glucose, and high body-mass index. In 2019, the leading Level 2 risk factor globally for attributable deaths was high systolic blood pressure, which accounted for 10·8 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 9·51–12·1) deaths (19·2% [16·9–21·3] of all deaths in 2019), followed by tobacco (smoked, second-hand, and chewing), which accounted for 8·71 million (8·12–9·31) deaths (15·4% [14·6–16·2] of all deaths in 2019). The leading Level 2 risk factor for attributable DALYs globally in 2019 was child and maternal malnutrition, which largely affects health in the youngest age groups and accounted for 295 million (253–350) DALYs (11·6% [10·3–13·1] of all global DALYs that year). The risk factor burden varied considerably in 2019 between age groups and locations. Among children aged 0–9 years, the three leading detailed risk factors for attributable DALYs were all related to malnutrition. Iron deficiency was the leading risk factor for those aged 10–24 years, alcohol use for those aged 25–49 years, and high systolic blood pressure for those aged 50–74 years and 75 years and older. Interpretation Overall, the record for reducing exposure to harmful risks over the past three decades is poor. Success with reducing smoking and lead exposure through regulatory policy might point the way for a stronger role for public policy on other risks in addition to continued efforts to provide information on risk factor harm to the general public. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Effects of gaseous and solid constituents of air pollution on endothelial function

            Abstract Ambient air pollution is a leading cause of non-communicable disease globally. The largest proportion of deaths and morbidity due to air pollution is now known to be due to cardiovascular disorders. Several particulate and gaseous air pollutants can trigger acute events (e.g. myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure). While the mechanisms by which air pollutants cause cardiovascular events is undergoing continual refinement, the preponderant evidence support rapid effects of a diversity of pollutants including all particulate pollutants (e.g. course, fine, ultrafine particles) and gaseous pollutants such as ozone, on vascular function. Indeed alterations in endothelial function seem to be critically important in transducing signals and eventually promoting cardiovascular disorders such as hypertension, diabetes, and atherosclerosis. Here, we provide an updated overview of the impact of particulate and gaseous pollutants on endothelial function from human and animal studies. The evidence for causal mechanistic pathways from both animal and human studies that support various hypothesized general pathways and their individual and collective impact on vascular function is highlighted. We also discuss current gaps in knowledge and evidence from trials evaluating the impact of personal-level strategies to reduce exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and impact on vascular function, given the current lack of definitive randomized evidence using hard endpoints. We conclude by an exhortation for formal inclusion of air pollution as a major risk factor in societal guidelines and provision of formal recommendations to prevent adverse cardiovascular effects attributable to air pollution.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Particulate matter beyond mass: recent health evidence on the role of fractions, chemical constituents and sources of emission

              Particulate matter (PM) is regulated in various parts of the world based on specific size cut offs, often expressed as 10 or 2.5 µm mass median aerodynamic diameter. This pollutant is deemed one of the most dangerous to health and moreover, problems persist with high ambient concentrations. Continuing pressure to re-evaluate ambient air quality standards stems from research that not only has identified effects at low levels of PM but which also has revealed that reductions in certain components, sources and size fractions may best protect public health. Considerable amount of published information have emerged from toxicological research in recent years. Accumulating evidence has identified additional air quality metrics (e.g. black carbon, secondary organic and inorganic aerosols) that may be valuable in evaluating the health risks of, for example, primary combustion particles from traffic emissions, which are not fully taken into account with PM2.5 mass. Most of the evidence accumulated so far is for an adverse effect on health of carbonaceous material from traffic. Traffic-generated dust, including road, brake and tire wear, also contribute to the adverse effects on health. Exposure durations from a few minutes up to a year have been linked with adverse effects. The new evidence collected supports the scientific conclusions of the World Health Organization Air Quality Guidelines and also provides scientific arguments for taking decisive actions to improve air quality and reduce the global burden of disease associated with air pollution.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                10 January 2023
                17 January 2023
                10 January 2023
                : 120
                : 3
                : e2220028120
                Affiliations
                [1] aInstitute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
                [2] bChair of Epidemiology, Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München , 81377 Munich, Germany
                [3] cDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, MA 02115
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6645-0985
                Article
                202220028
                10.1073/pnas.2220028120
                9933087
                36626559
                d07336c5-a9a9-4d0e-a53d-34d252ba0359
                Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 3, Words: 1656
                Categories
                comm, Commentary
                env-sci-phys, Environmental Sciences
                417
                437
                Commentary
                Social Sciences
                Environmental Sciences
                Custom metadata
                free

                Comments

                Comment on this article