Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Student learning outcomes, perceptions and beliefs in the context of strengthening research integration into the first year of medical school

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Research integrated into undergraduate education is important in order for medical students to understand and value research for later clinical practice. Therefore, attempts are being made to strengthen the integration of research into teaching from the first year onwards. First-year students may interpret attempts made to strengthen research integration differently than intended by teachers. This might be explained by student beliefs about learning and research as well as student perceptions of the learning environment. In general, student perceptions of the learning environment play a pivotal role in fostering student learning outcomes. This study aims to determine whether a curriculum change intended to promote research integration fosters student learning outcomes and student perceptions of research integrated into teaching. To serve this purpose, three subsequent cohorts of first-year students were compared, one before and two after a curriculum change. Learning outcomes of these students were measured using scores on a national progress test of 921 students and assessments of a sample of 100 research reports of a first-year student research project. 746 Students filled out the Student Perceptions of Research Integration Questionnaire. The findings suggest that learning outcomes of these students, that is, scores on research related test items of the progress test and the quality of research reports, were better than those of students before the curriculum change.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The integration ladder: a tool for curriculum planning and evaluation.

            R Harden (2000)
            Integration has been accepted as an important educational strategy in medical education. Discussions about integration, however, are often polarized with some teachers in favour and others against integrated teaching. This paper describes 11 points on a continuum between the two extremes. * Isolation * Awareness * Harmonization * Nesting * Temporal co-ordination * Sharing * Correlation * Complementary * Multi-disciplinary * Inter-disciplinary * Trans-disciplinary As one moves up the ladder, there is less emphasis on the role of disciplines, an increasing requirement for a central curriculum, organizational structure and a requirement for greater participation by staff in curriculum discussions and planning. The integration ladder is a useful tool for the medical teacher and can be used as an aid in planning, implementing and evaluating the medical curriculum.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A review of literature on medical students and scholarly research: experiences, attitudes, and outcomes.

              The aim of medical student research programs is to develop interest in and competencies related to scholarly research within future physicians. Although schools invest in these programs, there is currently no consensus regarding what benefits they confer. The goal of this review is to characterize students' perceptions of research programs during medical school as well as the outcomes attributed to these programs to provide recommendations for their optimization.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                0031 7127 5854 , m.w.c.vereijken@iclon.leidenuniv.nl
                0031 7127 6496 , rrijst@iclon.leidenuniv.nl
                00613 8344 6736 , j.vandriel@unimelb.edu.au
                0031 7126 2183 , f.w.dekker@lumc.nl
                Journal
                Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract
                Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract
                Advances in Health Sciences Education
                Springer Netherlands (Dordrecht )
                1382-4996
                1573-1677
                11 November 2017
                11 November 2017
                2018
                : 23
                : 2
                : 371-385
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2312 1970, GRID grid.5132.5, ICLON Graduate School of Teaching, , Leiden University, ; P.O. Box 905, 2300 AX Leiden, The Netherlands
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2179 088X, GRID grid.1008.9, Graduate School of Education, , University of Melbourne, ; 234 Queensberry Street, Melbourne, VIC 3010 Australia
                [3 ]ISNI 0000000089452978, GRID grid.10419.3d, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, , Leiden University Medical Centre, ; P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
                Article
                9803
                10.1007/s10459-017-9803-0
                5882629
                29128900
                d026de22-aad4-4a4b-a476-cdf9e434aac1
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 8 November 2016
                : 3 November 2017
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

                Education
                undergraduate education,research-teaching nexus,student learning outcomes,undergraduate research

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content117

                Cited by15

                Most referenced authors369