28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Preoperative risk factors for postoperative complications in endoscopic pituitary surgery: a systematic review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The ability to preoperatively predict postoperative complication risks is valuable for individual counseling and (post)operative planning, e.g. to select low-risk patients eligible for short stay surgery or those with higher risks requiring special attention. These risks however, are not well established in pituitary surgery.

          Methods

          We conducted a systematic review of associations between preoperative characteristics and postoperative complications of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery according to the PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed through the QUIPS tool.

          Results

          In total 23 articles were included, containing 5491 patients (96% pituitary adenoma). There was a wide variety regarding the nature and number of risk factors, definitions, measurement and statistics employed, and overall quality of mainly retrospective studies was low. Consistent significant associations were older age for complications in general, and intraventricular extension for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. Associations identified in some but not all studies were younger age, increased BMI, female gender, and learning curve for CSF leaks; increased tumor size for complications in general; and Rathke’s cleft cysts for diabetes insipidus. Mortality (incidence rate 1%) was not addressed as a risk factor.

          Conclusion

          Based on current literature, of low to medium quality, it is not possible to comprehensively quantify risk factors for complications. Nevertheless, older age and intraventricular extension were associated with increased postoperative complications. Future research should aim at prospective data collection, reporting of outcomes, and uniformity of definitions. Only then a proper risk analysis can be performed for endoscopic pituitary surgery.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11102-017-0839-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors.

            Previous work has identified 6 important areas to consider when evaluating validity and bias in studies of prognostic factors: participation, attrition, prognostic factor measurement, confounding measurement and account, outcome measurement, and analysis and reporting. This article describes the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool, which includes questions related to these areas that can inform judgments of risk of bias in prognostic research.A working group comprising epidemiologists, statisticians, and clinicians developed the tool as they considered prognosis studies of low back pain. Forty-three groups reviewing studies addressing prognosis in other topic areas used the tool and provided feedback. Most reviewers (74%) reported that reaching consensus on judgments was easy. Median completion time per study was 20 minutes; interrater agreement (κ statistic) reported by 9 review teams varied from 0.56 to 0.82 (median, 0.75). Some reviewers reported challenges making judgments across prompting items, which were addressed by providing comprehensive guidance and examples. The refined Quality In Prognosis Studies tool may be useful to assess the risk of bias in studies of prognostic factors.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              What Is Value in Health Care?

              New England Journal of Medicine, 363(26), 2477-2481
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31-(0)71-5262109 , d.j.lobatto@lumc.nl
                Journal
                Pituitary
                Pituitary
                Pituitary
                Springer US (New York )
                1386-341X
                1573-7403
                15 September 2017
                15 September 2017
                2018
                : 21
                : 1
                : 84-97
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000000089452978, GRID grid.10419.3d, Department of Neurosurgery, , Leiden University Medical Center, ; Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
                [2 ]ISNI 0000000089452978, GRID grid.10419.3d, Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, , Leiden University Medical Center, ; Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
                [3 ]ISNI 0000000089452978, GRID grid.10419.3d, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, , Leiden University Medical Center, ; Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
                Article
                839
                10.1007/s11102-017-0839-1
                5767215
                28916976
                cfdda15c-705c-4404-ac90-d9663c2ac2a4
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

                Medicine
                pituitary,endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery,risk factors,csf leak,bleeding,diabetes insipidus

                Comments

                Comment on this article