24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of therapist-guided internet-delivered behaviour therapy for children and adolescents with Tourette syndrome: study protocol for a single-blind randomised controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Treatment guidelines recommend behaviour therapy (BT) for patients with Tourette syndrome (TS) and chronic tic disorder (CTD). However, BT is rarely accessible due to limited availability of trained therapists and long travel distances to specialist clinics. Internet-delivered BT has the potential of overcoming these barriers through remote delivery of treatment with minimal therapist support. In the current protocol, we outline the design and methods of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating an internet-delivered BT programme referred to as BIP TIC. The trial’s primary objective is to determine the clinical efficacy of BIP TIC for reducing tic severity in young people with TS/CTD, compared with an active control intervention. Secondary objectives are to investigate the 12-month durability of the treatment effects and to perform a health economic evaluation of the intervention.

          Methods

          In this single-blind superiority RCT, 220 participants (9–17 years) with TS/CTD throughout Sweden will be randomised to 10–12 weeks of either therapist-supported internet-delivered BT based on exposure with response prevention ( BIP TIC) or therapist-supported internet-delivered education. Data will be collected at baseline, 3 and 5 weeks into the treatment, at post-treatment, and 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. The primary endpoint is the 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome is tic severity as measured by the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale – Total Tic Severity Score. Treatment response is operationalised as scores of “Very much improved” or “Much improved” on the Clinical Global Impression – Improvement scale, administered at the primary endpoint. Outcome assessors will be blind to treatment condition at all assessment points. A health economic evaluation of BIP TIC will be performed, both in the short term (primary endpoint) and the long term (12-month follow-up). There are no planned interim analyses.

          Discussion

          Participant recruitment started on 26 April 2019 and finished on 9 April 2021. The total number of included participants was 221. The final participant is expected to reach the primary endpoint in September 2021 and the 12-month follow-up in June 2022. Data analysis for the primary objective will commence after the last participant reaches the primary endpoint.

          Trial registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03916055. Registered on 16 April 2019.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05592-z.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The clinical global impressions scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice.

          This paper reviews the potential value in daily clinical practice of an easily applied research tool, the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Scale, for the nonresearcher clinician to quantify and track patient progress and treatment response over time. The instrument is described and sample patient scenarios are provided with scoring rationales and a practical charting system. The CGI severity and improvement scales offer a readily understood, practical measurement tool that can easily be administered by a clinician in a busy clinical practice setting.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reliability and validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID).

            To investigate the concurrent validity and reliability of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID), a short structured diagnostic interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10 psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents. Participants were 226 children and adolescents (190 outpatients and 36 controls) aged 6 to 17 years. To assess the concurrent validity of the MINI-KID, participants were administered the MINI-KID and the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Aged Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL) by blinded interviewers in a counterbalanced order on the same day. Participants also completed a self-rated measure of disability. In addition, interrater (n = 57) and test-retest (n = 83) reliability data (retest interval, 1-5 days) were collected, and agreement between the parent version of the MINI-KID and the standard MINI-KID (n = 140) was assessed. Data were collected between March 2004 and January 2008. Substantial to excellent MINI-KID to K-SADS-PL concordance was found for syndromal diagnoses of any mood disorder, any anxiety disorder, any substance use disorder, any ADHD or behavioral disorder, and any eating disorder (area under curve [AUC] = 0.81-0.96, kappa = 0.56-0.87). Results were more variable for psychotic disorder (AUC = 0.94, kappa = 0.41). Sensitivity was substantial (0.61-1.00) for 15/20 individual DSM-IV disorders. Specificity was excellent (0.81-1.00) for 18 disorders and substantial (> 0.73) for the remaining 2. The MINI-KID identified a median of 3 disorders per subject compared to 2 on the K-SADS-PL and took two-thirds less time to administer (34 vs 103 minutes). Interrater and test-retest kappas were substantial to almost perfect (0.64-1.00) for all individual MINI-KID disorders except dysthymia. Concordance of the parent version (MINI-KID-P) with the standard MINI-KID was good. The MINI-KID generates reliable and valid psychiatric diagnoses for children and adolescents and does so in a third of the time as the K-SADS-PL. (c) 2010 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A children's global assessment scale (CGAS).

              We evaluated the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS), an adaptation of the Global Assessment Scale for adults. Our findings indicate that the CGAS can be a useful measure of overall severity of disturbance. It was found to be reliable between raters and across time. Moreover, it demonstrated both discriminant and concurrent validity. Given these favorable psychometric properties and its relative simplicity, the CGAS is recommended to both clinicians and researchers as a complement to syndrome-specific scales.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                per.andren@ki.se
                Journal
                Trials
                Trials
                Trials
                BioMed Central (London )
                1745-6215
                30 September 2021
                30 September 2021
                2021
                : 22
                : 669
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.4714.6, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0626, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, , Karolinska Institutet, ; Gävlegatan 22, 113 30 Stockholm, Sweden
                [2 ]GRID grid.467087.a, ISNI 0000 0004 0442 1056, Stockholm Health Care Services, ; Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
                [3 ]GRID grid.4563.4, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8868, Institute of Mental Health, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, , University of Nottingham, ; Nottingham, UK
                [4 ]GRID grid.4563.4, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8868, NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, , University of Nottingham, ; Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
                [5 ]GRID grid.83440.3b, ISNI 0000000121901201, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), ; 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH UK
                [6 ]GRID grid.424537.3, ISNI 0000 0004 5902 9895, Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, ; Great Ormond Street, London, UK
                [7 ]GRID grid.4563.4, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8868, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, , University of Nottingham, ; Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK
                [8 ]GRID grid.8993.b, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9457, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, , Uppsala University, ; Uppsala, Sweden
                [9 ]GRID grid.4714.6, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0626, Unit of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, , Karolinska Institutet, ; Stockholm, Sweden
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1358-0166
                Article
                5592
                10.1186/s13063-021-05592-z
                8481317
                34593015
                cfd44612-aa27-43a3-86dd-ed247ceb0190
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 5 February 2021
                : 1 September 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004359, Vetenskapsrådet;
                Award ID: 2018-00344
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100006636, Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd;
                Award ID: 2017-01066
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Region Stockholm (ALF)
                Award ID: 20180093
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Karolinska Institute
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Medicine
                tourette syndrome,tic disorders,tics,behaviour therapy,exposure with response prevention, internet-based interventions, self-help

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content103

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors843