For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
2
views
21
references
 Top references
cited by
7
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      1,442
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Fetal Malposition : Impact and Management

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Fetal malposition, either occiput posterior or transverse (OT), leads to greater risk of cesarean delivery, prolonged labor, and increased perinatal morbidity. Historically, there is a known association between epidural use and malposition that was assumed to be due to the increased discomfort of laboring with a fetus in the occiput posterior position. However, evidence now suggests that the epidural itself may contribute to fetal malposition by impacting the probability of internal rotation. Fetal malposition may be impacted by manual rotation. Manual rotation has been associated with greater rates of delivering in the occiput anterior position and lower rates of cesarean delivery.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Changes in fetal position during labor and their association with epidural analgesia.

          Ellice Lieberman, Lobin Lee, Rebecca K Davidson … (2005)
          To evaluate whether epidural analgesia is associated with a higher rate of abnormal fetal head position at delivery. We conducted a prospective cohort study of 1,562 women to evaluate changes in fetal position during labor by using serial ultrasound examinations. Ultrasound examinations were performed at enrollment, epidural administration, 4 hours after the initial ultrasonography if epidural had not been administered, and late in labor (> 8 cm). Information about fetal head position at delivery was obtained from the provider. Regardless of fetal head position at enrollment (occiput transverse, occiput posterior, or occiput anterior), most fetuses were occiput anterior at delivery (enrollment position: occiput transverse 78%, occiput posterior 80%, occiput anterior 83%, P = .1). Final fetal position was established close to delivery. Of fetuses that were occiput posterior late in labor, only 20.7% were occiput posterior at delivery. Changes in fetal head position were common, and 36% of women had an occiput posterior fetus on at least one ultrasound examination. Women receiving epidural did not have more occiput posterior fetuses at the enrollment (23.4% epidural versus 26.0 no epidural, P = .9) or the epidural/4-hour ultrasound examination (24.9% epidural, 28.3% no epidural), but did have more occiput posterior fetuses at delivery (12.9% epidural versus 3.3% no epidural, P = .002); the association remained in a multivariate model (adjusted odds ratio 4.0, 95% confidence interval 1.4-11.1). Fetal position changes are common during labor, with the final fetal position established close to delivery. Our demonstration of a strong association of epidural with fetal occiput posterior position at delivery represents a mechanism that may contribute to the lower rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery consistently observed with epidural.
          Article 0 comments Cited 37 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Influence of persistent occiput posterior position on delivery outcome.

            C O'Herlihy, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Kemedy McQuillan (2001)
            To evaluate the influence of intrapartum persistent occiput posterior position of the fetal head on delivery outcome and anal sphincter injury, with reference to the association with epidural analgesia. We conducted a prospective observational study of 246 women with persistent occiput posterior position in labor during a 2-year period, compared with 13,543 contemporaneous vaginal deliveries with occiput anterior position. The incidence of persistent occiput posterior position was significantly greater among primiparas (2.4%) than multiparas (1.3%; P <.001; 95% confidence interval 1.4, 2.4) and was associated with significantly higher incidences of prolonged pregnancy, induction of labor, oxytocin augmentation of labor, epidural use, and prolonged labor. Only 29% of primiparas and 55% of multiparas with persistent occiput posterior position achieved spontaneous vaginal delivery, and the malposition was associated with 12% of all cesarean deliveries performed because of dystocia. Persistent occiput posterior position was also associated with a sevenfold higher incidence of anal sphincter disruption. Despite a high overall incidence of use of epidural analgesia (47% versus 3%), the institutional incidence of persistent occiput posterior position was lower than that reported 25 years ago. Persistent occiput posterior position contributed disproportionately to cesarean and instrumental delivery, with fewer than half of the occiput posterior labors ending in spontaneous delivery and the position accounting for 12% of all cesarean deliveries for dystocia. Persistent occiput posterior position leads to a sevenfold increase in the incidence of anal sphincter injury. Use of epidural analgesia was not related to the malposition.
            Article 0 comments Cited 26 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Investigation of occiput posterior delivery by intrapartum sonography.

              Anita R. Howard, E Tsoi, E Osei-Bonsu … (2004)
              To investigate if occiput posterior delivery is the consequence of persistence of an initial occiput posterior position or malrotation from an initial occiput anterior or transverse position. This was a cross-sectional study involving transabdominal sonography to determine fetal occipital position in 918 singleton pregnancies with cephalic presentation in active labor at 37-42 weeks of gestation. The relationship between occipital position in labor and at delivery was examined. The occiput was posterior in 33.0% (149/452), 33.9% (101/298) and 19.0% (32/168) of fetuses at the respective cervical dilatations of 3-5, 6-9 and 10 cm and this persisted at delivery in 21.5% (32/149), 31.7% (32/101) and 43.8% (14/32) of cases. In 70% (32/46), 91% (32/35) and 100% (14/14) of occiput posterior deliveries there was persistence from this position at 3-5, 6-9 and 10 cm of cervical dilation. The majority of occiput posterior positions during labor rotate to the anterior position even at 10 cm of cervical dilatation. However, the vast majority of occiput posterior positions at delivery are a consequence of persistence of this position during labor rather than malrotation from an initial occiput anterior or transverse position. Copyright 2004 ISUOG
              Article 0 comments Cited 25 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Title: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
                Abbreviated Title: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
                Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                ISSN (Print): 0009-9201
                Publication date Created: 2015
                Publication date (Print): June 2015
                Volume: 58
                Issue: 2
                Pages: 241-245
                Article
                DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000106
                PubMed ID: 25851845
                SO-VID: cf7aee87-285b-4818-b605-470fc6c23243
                Copyright © © 2015
                History

                Data availability:

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content1,442

                See all similar

                Cited by7

                See all cited by