1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A ureteral stricture disease score and classification system: correlation with upper urinary tract reconstructive surgery complexity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          To develop an original and standardized ureteral stricture disease (USD) score and classification system for quantifying ureter stricture characteristics, assessing complexity of the minimally invasive upper urinary tract reconstructive (UUTR) surgical procedure, formulating preoperative plans, and offering objective comparisons of surgical techniques between different institutions and surgeons.

          Methods

          We retrospectively reviewed a test set of 64 patients and a validation set of 170 patients who underwent minimally invasive UUTR surgery from January 2018 to January 2021. Three factors were selected to be included in the USD score and classification system: (I) stricture etiology (E, 1–2 points); (II) stricture segment (S, 0–3 points); and (III) length of stricture (L, 1–5 points). The UUTR surgery involves low-complex surgeries (cystoscopy with ureteral dilation and stent placement, ureteropyeloplasty, end to end repair, ureteral reimplantation) and high-complex surgeries (onlay repair (buccal mucosae, lingual mucosae, appendix mucosae), Boari flap repair and ileal ureter replacement). Estimated blood loss and operative time were used as surrogate indicators of surgical complexity.

          Results

          The interrater reliability of the USD score and classification system was 0.908. A linear relationship between the USD score and estimated blood loss was observed (rs =0.676, P<0.001). The USD score was also correlated with operative time (rs =0.638, P<0.001). A significant difference in USD scores was found between the high and low complexity surgery groups (4 vs. 7, P<0.001). Variability of UUTR surgery is based on USD classification system, but with regularity to conform to.

          Conclusions

          The USD score and classification system is a concise, easily applicable, and validated scale to delineate the clinically significant features of ureter stricture that correlate with the complexity of the UUTR surgical procedure. The use of this score and classification system can facilitate preoperative plan and comparison of USD treatments in clinical practice and urological literature. Research with large sample is needed to further examine and modify the use of the system.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth.

          Treatment decisions for renal malignancies depend largely on qualitative data, including a description of tumor anatomy and the experience of the treating surgeon. Currently characterization of renal tumor anatomical elements is descriptive and lacks standardization. Surgical decision making and data set comparisons would be significantly enhanced by a consistent, reproducible system that quantitates the pertinent characteristics of localized renal lesions. We have developed and propose a standardized nephrometry scoring system (R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score) to quantify the anatomical characteristics of renal masses on computerized tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. The nephrometry score is based on 5 critical and reproducible anatomical features of solid renal masses. Of the 5 components 4 are scored on a 1, 2 or 3-point scale with the 5th indicating the anterior or posterior location of the mass relative to the coronal plane of the kidney. We applied the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score to 50 consecutive masses resected at Fox Chase Cancer Center. The R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score consists of (R)adius (tumor size as maximal diameter), (E)xophytic/endophytic properties of the tumor, (N)earness of tumor deepest portion to the collecting system or sinus, (A)nterior (a)/posterior (p) descriptor and the (L)ocation relative to the polar line. The suffix h (hilar) is assigned to tumors that abut the main renal artery or vein. The nephrometry scoring system accurately classified the complexity of 50 consecutive tumors undergoing excision at our institution. Standardized reporting of renal tumor size, location and depth is essential for decision making and effective comparisons. The R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score is a reproducible standardized classification system that quantitates the salient anatomy of renal masses. This novel approach for the systematic characterization of renal tumors provides a tool for meaningful comparisons of renal masses in clinical practice and in the urological literature.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Nomogram Predicting Prostate Cancer–specific Mortality for Men with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy

            The natural history of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-defined biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) after definitive local therapy is highly variable. Validated prediction models for PCa-specific mortality (PCSM) in this population are needed for treatment decision-making and clinical trial design.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ureteral injuries: external and iatrogenic.

              Both iatrogenic and traumatic ureteral injuries are rare. However, a high index of suspicion is warranted for ureteral injuries because ureteral injuries are associated with increased morbidity. The urologist should be familiar with several methods for identifying ureteral injuries and should make evaluations tailored to the clinical situation. Most ureteral injuries are short transections and can be repaired with debridement and ureteroureterostomy in the proximal and mid-ureter or ureteroneocystostomy in the distal ureter.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Transl Androl Urol
                Transl Androl Urol
                TAU
                Translational Andrology and Urology
                AME Publishing Company
                2223-4683
                2223-4691
                October 2021
                October 2021
                : 10
                : 10
                : 3745-3755
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University , deptNational Urological Cancer Centre , Beijing, China;
                [2 ]deptDepartment of Urology , Emergency General Hospital , Beijing, China;
                [3 ]deptDepartment of Urology , Beijing Jiangong Hospital , Beijing, China
                Author notes

                Contributions: (I) Conception and design: W Zhu, H Zhu, X Li; (II) Administrative support: J Lin, L Zhou; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: X Li, J Zhang, Y Xv, C Huang, D Zhang; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: X Wang, P Zhang, B Huang; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: Z Zhu, Z Li; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

                [#]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Correspondence to: Hongjian Zhu. Department of Urology, Beijing Jiangong Hospital, No. 6 Rufuli St, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China. Email: hjzhu99@ 123456sina.com ; Xuesong Li. Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China. Email: pineneedle@ 123456sina.com .
                [^]

                ORCID: 0000-0003-2699-8377.

                Article
                tau-10-10-3745
                10.21037/tau-21-575
                8575562
                34804818
                cf3f1ecb-a18c-4b4e-8dc6-71b43d5194ae
                2021 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.

                Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0.

                History
                : 30 June 2021
                : 02 September 2021
                Categories
                Original Article

                ureter stricture disease (usd),upper urinary tract reconstruction (uutr),score system,classification system,minimally invasive surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article