17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A self-management psychoeducational eHealth program to support and empower people with advanced cancer and their family caregivers: Development using the scrum methodology

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          eHealth programs could be a flexible and scalable resource to support and empower people with advanced cancer and their family caregivers. A face-to-face intervention that has demonstrated effectiveness is the “FOCUS” program, developed and tested in the USA. Recently the FOCUS program was translated and adapted to the European context as part of an international study in six European countries, resulting in the “FOCUS+” program. FOCUS+ served as the basis for development of the web-based iFOCUS program.

          Objective

          We aim to (1) describe the development process of the iFOCUS program, (2) outline the challenges we encountered and how they were overcome, and (3) present findings regarding the acceptability and usability of iFOCUS.

          Methods

          We used the four phased agile Scrum methodology to develop iFOCUS and applied set timeframes of rapid program development and evaluation (sprints). Five teams were involved in the development i.e. a core development group, a web development team, an international consortium, audio-visual experts, and potential end-users.

          Results

          Development followed seven steps, integrated across the four phases of Scrum: (1) concept design, (2) development of mock-ups, (3) Feedback from the international consortium, (4) technical development of iFOCUS, (5) creating versions for the six participating countries, (6) preliminary testing of iFOCUS and (7) implementing the final version in a randomized controlled trial. User testing included 42 participants (twenty patient-family caregiver dyads and two bereaved family caregivers) who reviewed the iFOCUS program. Users found the iFOCUS program to be acceptable and usable. Feedback mainly focused on text size and fonts. Minor changes to the content, tailoring, and program flow were required. During development we encountered program specific and general challenges. Using the Scrum methodology facilitated iterative development to address these issues. For some challenges, such as tailoring, we had to make pragmatic choices due to time and resource limitations.

          Conclusions/discussion

          The development of a tailored, self-managed psychoeducational eHealth program for people with advanced cancer and their family caregivers is an intense process and requires pragmatic choices. By keeping the emphasis on the target population during development, no specific remarks pertaining to advanced cancer were identified. Some challenges we encountered are common to eHealth development, others were related to program specific requirements. Using the Scrum methodology allows teams to efficiently collaborate during program development and increases the flexibility of the development process. Interpersonal contact between research staff and potential end-users is recommended during and after the development of eHealth programs.

          Highlights

          • Cancer patients and their family caregivers often experience reduced quality of life.

          • eHealth programs are promising resources to support patient-family caregiver dyads.

          • Developing a tailored, self-managed eHealth program for dyads is a complex process.

          • The Scrum methodology allows for an efficient and flexible eHealth development process.

          • Pragmatic choices need to be made during development of eHealth programs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Early palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

          Patients with advanced cancer have reduced quality of life, which tends to worsen towards the end of life. We assessed the effect of early palliative care in patients with advanced cancer on several aspects of quality of life. The study took place at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (Toronto, ON, Canada), between Dec 1, 2006, and Feb 28, 2011. 24 medical oncology clinics were cluster randomised (in a 1:1 ratio, using a computer-generated sequence, stratified by clinic size and tumour site [four lung, eight gastrointestinal, four genitourinary, six breast, two gynaecological]), to consultation and follow-up (at least monthly) by a palliative care team or to standard cancer care. Complete masking of interventions was not possible; however, patients provided written informed consent to participate in their own study group, without being informed of the existence of another group. Eligible patients had advanced cancer, European Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and a clinical prognosis of 6-24 months. Quality of life (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy--Spiritual Well-Being [FACIT-Sp] scale and Quality of Life at the End of Life [QUAL-E] scale), symptom severity (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [ESAS]), satisfaction with care (FAMCARE-P16), and problems with medical interactions (Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System Medical Interaction Subscale [CARES-MIS]) were measured at baseline and monthly for 4 months. The primary outcome was change score for FACIT-Sp at 3 months. Secondary endpoints included change score for FACIT-Sp at 4 months and change scores for other scales at 3 and 4 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01248624. 461 patients completed baseline measures (228 intervention, 233 control); 393 completed at least one follow-up assessment. At 3-months, there was a non-significant difference in change score for FACIT-Sp between intervention and control groups (3·56 points [95% CI -0·27 to 7·40], p=0·07), a significant difference in QUAL-E (2·25 [0·01 to 4·49], p=0·05) and FAMCARE-P16 (3·79 [1·74 to 5·85], p=0·0003), and no difference in ESAS (-1·70 [-5·26 to 1·87], p=0·33) or CARES-MIS (-0·66 [-2·25 to 0·94], p=0·40). At 4 months, there were significant differences in change scores for all outcomes except CARES-MIS. All differences favoured the intervention group. Although the difference in quality of life was non-significant at the primary endpoint, this trial shows promising findings that support early palliative care for patients with advanced cancer. Canadian Cancer Society, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A meta-analysis of web-delivered tailored health behavior change interventions.

            Web-based tailored intervention programs show considerable promise in effecting health-promoting behaviors and improving health outcomes across a variety of medical conditions and patient populations. This meta-analysis compares the effects of tailored versus nontailored web-based interventions on health behaviors and explores the influence of key moderators on treatment outcomes. Forty experimental and quasi-experimental studies (N =20,180) met criteria for inclusion and were analyzed using meta-analytic procedures. The findings indicated that web-based tailored interventions effected significantly greater improvement in health outcomes as compared with control conditions both at posttesting, d =.139 (95% CI = .111, .166, p <.001, k =40) and at follow-up, d =.158 (95% CI = .124, .192, p <.001, k =21). The authors found no evidence of publication bias. These results provided further support for the differential benefits of tailored web-based interventions over nontailored approaches. Analysis of participant/descriptive, intervention, and methodological moderators shed some light on factors that may be important to the success of tailored interventions. Implications of these findings and directions for future research are discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The increasing value of eHealth in the delivery of patient-centred cancer care

              The increasing use of eHealth has ushered in a new era of patient-centred cancer care that moves beyond the traditional in-person care model to real-time, dynamic, and technology-assisted assessments and interventions. eHealth has the potential to better the delivery of cancer care through improved patient–provider communication, enhanced symptom and toxicity assessment and management, and optimised patient engagement across the cancer care continuum. In this Review, we provide a brief, narrative appraisal of the peer reviewed literature over the past 10 years related to the uses of patient-centred eHealth to improve cancer care delivery. These uses include the addressal of symptom management, health-related quality of life, and other patient-reported outcomes across cancer care. In addition, we discuss the challenges of, and opportunities for, accessibility, scalability, and implementation of these technologies, important areas for further development, and future research directions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Internet Interv
                Internet Interv
                Internet Interventions
                Elsevier
                2214-7829
                09 August 2023
                September 2023
                09 August 2023
                : 33
                : 100659
                Affiliations
                [a ]Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
                [b ]Ghent University, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
                [c ]Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
                [d ]University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
                [e ]Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
                [f ]Palliative Care Research Unit, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
                [g ]University College Dublin, National University of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
                [h ]Scientific Directorate, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
                [i ]Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
                [j ]The School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
                [k ]Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
                [l ]Ghent University Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
                [m ]St Vincent's Hospital and the Univeristy of Melbourne, Centre of Palliative Care, Melbourne, Australia
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: End-of-Life Care Research Group, Ghent University and Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. vincent.vangoethem@ 123456ugent.be
                [1]

                ‘Evaluation of Dyadic Psychosocial Interventions for People with Advanced Cancer and their Informal Caregivers (DIAdIC): An international randomized controlled trial’ – ‘DIAdIC’ (EU grant agreement No 825722)

                Group authorship: Kim Eecloo 2; Agnes van der Heide, Judith Rietjens, Erica Witkamp 8; Katherine Bristowe, Lydia Tutt 12; Kevin Brazil, Joanne Reid, Gillian Prue 10; Silvia Di Leo, Massimo Costantini, Monica Guberti 7; Mogens Groenvold, Caroline Møller Arnfeldt, Ulrik Sørensen Schmidt 5; Charles Normand, Peter May, Samantha Smith 7; Suzanne Guerin, Philip Larkin, Paul D'Alton, Michael Connolly 11.

                Article
                S2214-7829(23)00059-3 100659
                10.1016/j.invent.2023.100659
                10428037
                cef196b9-bf35-4594-a1d8-0b60135d315c
                © 2023 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 17 February 2023
                : 13 July 2023
                : 8 August 2023
                Categories
                Full length Article

                ehealth,dyadic,advanced cancer,family caregiver,intervention development,psychoeducational intervention

                Comments

                Comment on this article