1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Strategic career behaviours among hybrid workers: testing a general European model

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          This study investigates the antecedents and consequences of strategic career management behaviours in a sample.

          Methods

          A total of 739 employees (Male = 442, 59.8%) with a mean age of 27.64 years (SD = 8.48; Range = [18, 70]), working mostly full-time ( n = 398, 53.9%) and with 46.35% of their work being done hybrid-like participated in this study. The study tested perceived self-efficacy, desire for career control and perceived organizational support as predictors of strategic career behaviours. And tested strategic career behaviours as predictors of perceived career control, objective and subjective career success, and career satisfaction.

          Results

          Results indicate objective career success was not related to the antecedent variables of strategic career behaviours and hence was removed from the model. Regression and mediation analyses demonstrated that perceived self-efficacy and desire for career control are good predictors of the use of strategic career behaviours, but perceived organizational support is not; strategic career behaviours are reasonable predictors of perceived control, and very strong predictors of subjective career success and career satisfaction.

          Discussion

          Strategic Career Behaviours were found to play only a partial mediating role in the present model suggesting that further analysis is required to determine whether they play a central role in the relationships between the antecedents and consequences in the present model, or whether they should be considered a contributing but merely parallel factor. These results will support career management programs, accounting for idiosyncrasies of hybrid work.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Perceived organizational support.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            PREDICTORS OF OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE CAREER SUCCESS: A META-ANALYSIS

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment *

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2330216/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/362997/overviewRole: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1820353/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                02 April 2024
                2024
                : 15
                : 1347352
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculdade de Ciências Humanas, CRC-W , Lisbon, Portugal
                [2] 2ISCAL , Lisbon, Portugal
                [3] 3University of Trieste , Trieste, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Ferdinando Toscano, University of Bologna, Italy

                Reviewed by: Angela Russo, University of Catania, Italy

                Jurgita Lazauskaitė-Zabielskė, Vilnius University, Lithuania

                *Correspondence: Joana Carneiro Pinto, joanacarneiropinto@ 123456ucp.pt
                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1347352
                11019018
                38629038
                cedc162f-18b3-4dc4-b86b-8fd701801f57
                Copyright © 2024 Hildred, Piteira, Cervai and Pinto.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 30 November 2023
                : 23 February 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 5, Equations: 0, References: 71, Pages: 14, Words: 11969
                Funding
                The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study is part of a wider project funded through Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT; Foundation for Science and Technology), I.P. under the EXPL/PSI-GER/0321/2021 project – EURECA: New career strategies for new European remote careers.
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Organizational Psychology

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                strategic career behaviours,hybrid working,career management,european workers,antecedents and consequences

                Comments

                Comment on this article