11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Validation of a deep learning, value-based care model to predict mortality and comorbidities from chest radiographs in COVID-19

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We validate a deep learning model predicting comorbidities from frontal chest radiographs (CXRs) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and compare the model’s performance with hierarchical condition category (HCC) and mortality outcomes in COVID-19. The model was trained and tested on 14,121 ambulatory frontal CXRs from 2010 to 2019 at a single institution, modeling select comorbidities using the value-based Medicare Advantage HCC Risk Adjustment Model. Sex, age, HCC codes, and risk adjustment factor (RAF) score were used. The model was validated on frontal CXRs from 413 ambulatory patients with COVID-19 (internal cohort) and on initial frontal CXRs from 487 COVID-19 hospitalized patients (external cohort). The discriminatory ability of the model was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves compared to the HCC data from electronic health records, and predicted age and RAF score were compared using correlation coefficient and absolute mean error. The model predictions were used as covariables in logistic regression models to evaluate the prediction of mortality in the external cohort. Predicted comorbidities from frontal CXRs, including diabetes with chronic complications, obesity, congestive heart failure, arrhythmias, vascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, had a total area under ROC curve (AUC) of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.85–0.86). The ROC AUC of predicted mortality for the model was 0.84 (95% CI,0.79–0.88) for the combined cohorts. This model using only frontal CXRs predicted select comorbidities and RAF score in both internal ambulatory and external hospitalized COVID-19 cohorts and was discriminatory of mortality, supporting its potential use in clinical decision making.

          Author summary

          Artificial Intelligence algorithms in Radiology can be used not only on standard imaging data like chest radiographs to predict diagnoses but can also incorporate other data. We wanted to find out if we could combine administrative and demographic data with chest radiographs to predict common comorbidities and mortality. Our deep learning algorithm was able to predict diabetes with chronic complications, obesity, congestive heart failure, arrythmias, vascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The deep learning algorithm was also able to predict an administrative metric (RAF score) used in value-based Medicare Advantage plans. We used these predictions as biomarkers to predict mortality with a second statistical model using logistic regression in COVID-19 patients both in and out of the hospital. The degree of discrimination both the deep learning algorithm and statistical model provide would be considered ‘good’ by most, and certainly much better than chance alone. It was measured at 0.85 (95% CI: 0.85–0.86) by the area under the ROC curve method for the artificial intelligence algorithm, and 0.84 (95% CI:0.79–0.88) by the same method for the statistical mortality prediction model.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China

          Summary Background A recent cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China, was caused by a novel betacoronavirus, the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). We report the epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, and radiological characteristics and treatment and clinical outcomes of these patients. Methods All patients with suspected 2019-nCoV were admitted to a designated hospital in Wuhan. We prospectively collected and analysed data on patients with laboratory-confirmed 2019-nCoV infection by real-time RT-PCR and next-generation sequencing. Data were obtained with standardised data collection forms shared by WHO and the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium from electronic medical records. Researchers also directly communicated with patients or their families to ascertain epidemiological and symptom data. Outcomes were also compared between patients who had been admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and those who had not. Findings By Jan 2, 2020, 41 admitted hospital patients had been identified as having laboratory-confirmed 2019-nCoV infection. Most of the infected patients were men (30 [73%] of 41); less than half had underlying diseases (13 [32%]), including diabetes (eight [20%]), hypertension (six [15%]), and cardiovascular disease (six [15%]). Median age was 49·0 years (IQR 41·0–58·0). 27 (66%) of 41 patients had been exposed to Huanan seafood market. One family cluster was found. Common symptoms at onset of illness were fever (40 [98%] of 41 patients), cough (31 [76%]), and myalgia or fatigue (18 [44%]); less common symptoms were sputum production (11 [28%] of 39), headache (three [8%] of 38), haemoptysis (two [5%] of 39), and diarrhoea (one [3%] of 38). Dyspnoea developed in 22 (55%) of 40 patients (median time from illness onset to dyspnoea 8·0 days [IQR 5·0–13·0]). 26 (63%) of 41 patients had lymphopenia. All 41 patients had pneumonia with abnormal findings on chest CT. Complications included acute respiratory distress syndrome (12 [29%]), RNAaemia (six [15%]), acute cardiac injury (five [12%]) and secondary infection (four [10%]). 13 (32%) patients were admitted to an ICU and six (15%) died. Compared with non-ICU patients, ICU patients had higher plasma levels of IL2, IL7, IL10, GSCF, IP10, MCP1, MIP1A, and TNFα. Interpretation The 2019-nCoV infection caused clusters of severe respiratory illness similar to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and was associated with ICU admission and high mortality. Major gaps in our knowledge of the origin, epidemiology, duration of human transmission, and clinical spectrum of disease need fulfilment by future studies. Funding Ministry of Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Natural Science Foundation of China, and Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area

            There is limited information describing the presenting characteristics and outcomes of US patients requiring hospitalization for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              OpenSAFELY: factors associated with COVID-19 death in 17 million patients

              COVID-19 has rapidly impacted on mortality worldwide. 1 There is unprecedented urgency to understand who is most at risk of severe outcomes, requiring new approaches for timely analysis of large datasets. Working on behalf of NHS England we created OpenSAFELY: a secure health analytics platform covering 40% of all patients in England, holding patient data within the existing data centre of a major primary care electronic health records vendor. Primary care records of 17,278,392 adults were pseudonymously linked to 10,926 COVID-19 related deaths. COVID-19 related death was associated with: being male (hazard ratio 1.59, 95%CI 1.53-1.65); older age and deprivation (both with a strong gradient); diabetes; severe asthma; and various other medical conditions. Compared to people with white ethnicity, black and South Asian people were at higher risk even after adjustment for other factors (HR 1.48, 1.29-1.69 and 1.45, 1.32-1.58 respectively). We have quantified a range of clinical risk factors for COVID-19 related death in the largest cohort study conducted by any country to date. OpenSAFELY is rapidly adding further patients’ records; we will update and extend results regularly.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Project administrationRole: SoftwareRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: SupervisionRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Investigation
                Role: ValidationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: SupervisionRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLOS Digit Health
                PLOS Digit Health
                plos
                PLOS Digital Health
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                2767-3170
                1 August 2022
                August 2022
                : 1
                : 8
                : e0000057
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Radiology, Duly Health and Care, Hinsdale, Illinois
                [2 ] Department of Neurology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
                [3 ] Department of Radiology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida
                [4 ] Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
                [5 ] Department of Radiology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois
                [6 ] Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
                [7 ] Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois
                [8 ] Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota
                [9 ] Department of Radiology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
                [10 ] Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
                [11 ] Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
                Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8108-4706
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8056-8901
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5082-7132
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7746-7608
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0485-8579
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7811-5391
                Article
                PDIG-D-22-00013
                10.1371/journal.pdig.0000057
                9931278
                36812559
                ceb27877-f937-4ad4-8c62-b72dbe7521ff
                © 2022 Pyrros et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 21 January 2022
                : 5 May 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 4, Pages: 16
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000070, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering;
                Award ID: 75N92020C00008
                AP, NS and SK were funded by the Medical Imaging Data Resource Center, which is supported by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the National Institutes of Health under contracts 75N92020C00008 and 75N92020C00021. JR-F and WG received funding from the University of Illinois at Chicago Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) award ULTR002003. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Medical Conditions
                Infectious Diseases
                Viral Diseases
                Covid 19
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pulmonology
                Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Diagnostic Medicine
                Virus Testing
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Endocrinology
                Endocrine Disorders
                Diabetes Mellitus
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Medical Conditions
                Metabolic Disorders
                Diabetes Mellitus
                Computer and Information Sciences
                Artificial Intelligence
                Machine Learning
                Deep Learning
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Information Technology
                Electronic Medical Records
                Computer and Information Sciences
                Information Technology
                Health Information Technology
                Electronic Medical Records
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Medical Risk Factors
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Cardiology
                Arrhythmia
                Custom metadata
                Source code available: https://zenodo.org/record/6587719#.YpD1zC-cZQI.

                Comments

                Comment on this article