18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An overview of 25 years of incidence, treatment and outcome of colorectal cancer patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Regarding the continuous changes in the diagnostic process and treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC), it is important to evaluate long‐term trends which are relevant in giving direction for further research and innovations in cancer patient care. The aim of this study was to analyze developments in incidence, treatment and survival for patients diagnosed with CRC in the Netherlands. For this population‐based retrospective cohort study, all patients diagnosed with CRC between 1989 and 2014 in the Netherlands were identified using data of the nationwide population‐based Netherlands Cancer Registry ( n = 267,765), with follow‐up until January 1, 2016. Analyses were performed for trends in incidence, mortality, stage distribution, treatment and relative survival measured from the time of diagnosis. The incidence of both colon and rectal cancer has risen. The use of postoperative chemotherapy for Stage III colon cancer increased (14–60%), as well as the use of preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer (2–66%). The administration of systemic therapy and metastasectomy increased for Stage IV disease patients. The 5‐year relative survival increased significantly from 53 to 62% for colon cancer and from 51 to 65% for rectal cancer. Ongoing advancements in treatment, and also improvement in other factors in the care of CRC patients—such as diagnostics, dedicated surgery and pre‐ and postoperative care—lead to a continuous improvement in the relative survival of CRC patients. The increasing incidence of CRC favors the implementation of the screening program, of which the effects should be monitored closely.

          Abstract

          What's new?

          To best inform new directions for cancer management, it's important to study historical trends. Here, the authors analyzed 25 years of data in The Netherlands on colorectal cancer incidence, treatment and survival. During the period from 1989 to 2014, both incidence and 5‐year relative survival increased. Certain treatments also became more common, such as postoperative chemotherapy for Stage III patients and systemic therapy and surgical removal of metastases for Stage IV patients. Improved diagnostics and treatments have helped more patients survive, and the rising incidence of CRC supports the use of the nationwide screening program, introduced by the Dutch government in 2014.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Colorectal Cancer Incidence Patterns in the United States, 1974-2013.

          Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in the United States is declining rapidly overall but, curiously, is increasing among young adults. Age-specific and birth cohort patterns can provide etiologic clues, but have not been recently examined.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial

            Summary Background Preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy reduces the risk of local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer. However, improvements in surgery and histopathological assessment mean that the role of radiotherapy needs to be reassessed. We compared short-course preoperative radiotherapy versus initial surgery with selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy. Methods We undertook a randomised trial in 80 centres in four countries. 1350 patients with operable adenocarcinoma of the rectum were randomly assigned, by a minimisation procedure, to short-course preoperative radiotherapy (25 Gy in five fractions; n=674) or to initial surgery with selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions with concurrent 5-fluorouracil) restricted to patients with involvement of the circumferential resection margin (n=676). The primary outcome measure was local recurrence. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN 28785842. Findings At the time of analysis, which included all participants, 330 patients had died (157 preoperative radiotherapy group vs 173 selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy), and median follow-up of surviving patients was 4 years. 99 patients had developed local recurrence (27 preoperative radiotherapy vs 72 selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy). We noted a reduction of 61% in the relative risk of local recurrence for patients receiving preoperative radiotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0·39, 95% CI 0·27–0·58, p<0·0001), and an absolute difference at 3 years of 6·2% (95% CI 5·3–7·1) (4·4% preoperative radiotherapy vs 10·6% selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy). We recorded a relative improvement in disease-free survival of 24% for patients receiving preoperative radiotherapy (HR 0·76, 95% CI 0·62–0·94, p=0·013), and an absolute difference at 3 years of 6·0% (95% CI 5·3–6·8) (77·5% vs 71·5%). Overall survival did not differ between the groups (HR 0·91, 95% CI 0·73–1·13, p=0·40). Interpretation Taken with results from other randomised trials, our findings provide convincing and consistent evidence that short-course preoperative radiotherapy is an effective treatment for patients with operable rectal cancer. Funding Medical Research Council (UK) and the National Cancer Institute of Canada.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

              Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer has been proven safe, but debate continues over whether the available long-term survival data justify implementation of laparoscopic techniques in surgery for colon cancer. The aim of the COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection (COLOR) trial was to compare 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival after laparoscopic and open resection of solitary colon cancer. Between March 7, 1997, and March 6, 2003, patients recruited from 29 European hospitals with a solitary cancer of the right or left colon and a body-mass index up to 30 kg/m(2) were randomly assigned to either laparoscopic or open surgery as curative treatment in this non-inferiority randomised trial. Disease-free survival at 3 years after surgery was the primary outcome, with a prespecified non-inferiority boundary at 7% difference between groups. Secondary outcomes were short-term morbidity and mortality, number of positive resection margins, local recurrence, port-site or wound-site recurrence, and blood loss during surgery. Neither patients nor health-care providers were blinded to patient groupings. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00387842. During the recruitment period, 1248 patients were randomly assigned to either open surgery (n=621) or laparoscopic surgery (n=627). 172 were excluded after randomisation, mainly because of the presence of distant metastases or benign disease, leaving 1076 patients eligible for analysis (542 assigned open surgery and 534 assigned laparoscopic surgery). Median follow-up was 53 months (range 0.03-60). Positive resection margins, number of lymph nodes removed, and morbidity and mortality were similar in both groups. The combined 3-year disease-free survival for all stages was 74.2% (95% CI 70.4-78.0) in the laparoscopic group and 76.2% (72.6-79.8) in the open-surgery group (p=0.70 by log-rank test); the difference in disease-free survival after 3 years was 2.0% (95% CI -3.2 to 7.2). The hazard ratio (HR) for disease-free survival (open vs laparoscopic surgery) was 0.92 (95% CI 0.74-1.15). The combined 3-year overall survival for all stages was 81.8% (78.4-85.1) in the laparoscopic group and 84.2% (81.1-87.3) in the open-surgery group (p=0.45 by log-rank test); the difference in overall survival after 3 years was 2.4% (95% CI -2.1 to 7.0; HR 0.95 [0.74-1.22]). Our trial could not rule out a difference in disease-free survival at 3 years in favour of open colectomy because the upper limit of the 95% CI for the difference just exceeded the predetermined non-inferiority boundary of 7%. However, the difference in disease-free survival between groups was small and, we believe, clinically acceptable, justifying the implementation of laparoscopic surgery into daily practice. Further studies should address whether laparoscopic surgery is superior to open surgery in this setting.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                nelleke.brouwer@radboudumc.nl
                Journal
                Int J Cancer
                Int. J. Cancer
                10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0215
                IJC
                International Journal of Cancer
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                0020-7136
                1097-0215
                29 September 2018
                01 December 2018
                : 143
                : 11 ( doiID: 10.1002/ijc.v143.11 )
                : 2758-2766
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Surgery Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands
                [ 2 ] Department of Research Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (NCR) Utrecht The Netherlands
                [ 3 ] Department of Public Health Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands
                [ 4 ] Department of Surgery Academic Medical Center Amsterdam The Netherlands
                [ 5 ] Department of Pathology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence to: Nelleke P.M. Brouwer, Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands, E‐mail: nelleke.brouwer@ 123456radboudumc.nl ; Tel.: +31‐6‐4163‐4504
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2268-9668
                Article
                IJC31785
                10.1002/ijc.31785
                6282554
                30095162
                ce5de4c7-1bd9-460d-bf95-4c02cfde115c
                © 2018 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 05 March 2018
                : 22 June 2018
                : 11 July 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, Pages: 9, Words: 5765
                Funding
                Funded by: Radboud University Medical Center
                Funded by: Department of Surgery
                Categories
                Cancer Epidemiology
                Cancer Epidemiology
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                ijc31785
                1 December 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.5.3 mode:remove_FC converted:06.12.2018

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                colorectal cancer,colon cancer,rectal cancer,epidemiology,incidence,stage distribution,mortality,treatment,survival,trends

                Comments

                Comment on this article