3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The Genetics and Genomics of Plant Domestication

      , , , ,
      BioScience
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evolution of crop species: genetics of domestication and diversification.

          Domestication is a good model for the study of evolutionary processes because of the recent evolution of crop species (<12,000 years ago), the key role of selection in their origins, and good archaeological and historical data on their spread and diversification. Recent studies, such as quantitative trait locus mapping, genome-wide association studies and whole-genome resequencing studies, have identified genes that are associated with the initial domestication and subsequent diversification of crops. Together, these studies reveal the functions of genes that are involved in the evolution of crops that are under domestication, the types of mutations that occur during this process and the parallelism of mutations that occur in the same pathways and proteins, as well as the selective forces that are acting on these mutations and that are associated with geographical adaptation of crop species.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCE.

            J. Müller (1964)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Patterns and processes in crop domestication: an historical review and quantitative analysis of 203 global food crops.

              Domesticated food crops are derived from a phylogenetically diverse assemblage of wild ancestors through artificial selection for different traits. Our understanding of domestication, however, is based upon a subset of well-studied 'model' crops, many of them from the Poaceae family. Here, we investigate domestication traits and theories using a broader range of crops. We reviewed domestication information (e.g. center of domestication, plant traits, wild ancestors, domestication dates, domestication traits, early and current uses) for 203 major and minor food crops. Compiled data were used to test classic and contemporary theories in crop domestication. Many typical features of domestication associated with model crops, including changes in ploidy level, loss of shattering, multiple origins, and domestication outside the native range, are less common within this broader dataset. In addition, there are strong spatial and temporal trends in our dataset. The overall time required to domesticate a species has decreased since the earliest domestication events. The frequencies of some domestication syndrome traits (e.g. nonshattering) have decreased over time, while others (e.g. changes to secondary metabolites) have increased. We discuss the influences of the ecological, evolutionary, cultural and technological factors that make domestication a dynamic and ongoing process. © 2012 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2012 New Phytologist Trust.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BioScience
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0006-3568
                1525-3244
                November 2017
                November 01 2017
                October 11 2017
                November 2017
                November 01 2017
                October 11 2017
                : 67
                : 11
                : 971-982
                Article
                10.1093/biosci/bix114
                ce2efd20-a68d-4477-ba9d-8e7bec42215f
                © 2017
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article