36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prognostic effect of different PD-L1 expression patterns in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is expressed in various immune cells and tumor cells, and is able to bind to PD-1 on T lymphocytes, thereby inhibiting their function. At present, the PD-1/PD-L1 axis is a major immunotherapeutic target for checkpoint inhibition in various cancer types, but information on the clinical significance of PD-L1 expression in cervical cancer is largely lacking. Here, we studied PD-L1 expression in paraffin-embedded samples from two cohorts of patients with cervical cancer: primary tumor samples from cohort I (squamous cell carcinoma, n=156 and adenocarcinoma, n=49) and primary and paired metastatic tumor samples from cohort II (squamous cell carcinoma, n=96 and adenocarcinoma, n=31). Squamous cell carcinomas were more frequently positive for PD-L1 and also contained more PD-L1-positive tumor-associated macrophages as compared with adenocarcinomas (both P<0.001). PD-L1-positive tumor-associated macrophages were found to express CD163 and/or CD14 by triple fluorescent immunohistochemistry, demonstrating an M2-like phenotype. Interestingly, disease-free survival ( P=0.022) and disease-specific survival ( P=0.046) were significantly poorer in squamous cell carcinoma patients with diffuse PD-L1 expression as compared with patients with marginal PD-L1 expression (i.e., on the interface between tumor and stroma) in primary tumors. Disease-specific survival was significantly worse in adenocarcinoma patients with PD-L1-positive tumor-associated macrophages compared with adenocarcinoma patients without PD-L1-positive tumor-associated macrophages ( P=0.014). No differences in PD-L1 expression between primary tumors and paired metastatic lymph nodes were detected. However, PD-L1-positive immune cells were found in greater abundance around the metastatic tumors as compared with the paired primary tumors ( P=0.001 for squamous cell carcinoma and P=0.041 for adenocarcinoma). These findings point to a key role of PD-L1 in immune escape of cervical cancer, and provide a rationale for therapeutic targeting of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Involvement of PD-L1 on tumor cells in the escape from host immune system and tumor immunotherapy by PD-L1 blockade.

          PD-1 is a receptor of the Ig superfamily that negatively regulates T cell antigen receptor signaling by interacting with the specific ligands (PD-L) and is suggested to play a role in the maintenance of self-tolerance. In the present study, we examined possible roles of the PD-1/PD-L system in tumor immunity. Transgenic expression of PD-L1, one of the PD-L, in P815 tumor cells rendered them less susceptible to the specific T cell antigen receptor-mediated lysis by cytotoxic T cells in vitro, and markedly enhanced their tumorigenesis and invasiveness in vivo in the syngeneic hosts as compared with the parental tumor cells that lacked endogenous PD-L. Both effects could be reversed by anti-PD-L1 Ab. Survey of murine tumor lines revealed that all of the myeloma cell lines examined naturally expressed PD-L1. Growth of the myeloma cells in normal syngeneic mice was inhibited significantly albeit transiently by the administration of anti-PD-L1 Ab in vivo and was suppressed completely in the syngeneic PD-1-deficient mice. These results suggest that the expression of PD-L1 can serve as a potent mechanism for potentially immunogenic tumors to escape from host immune responses and that blockade of interaction between PD-1 and PD-L may provide a promising strategy for specific tumor immunotherapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Programmed death ligand-1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer.

            Recent strategies targeting the interaction of the programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1, B7-H1, CD274) with its receptor, PD-1, resulted in promising activity in early phase clinical trials. In this study, we used various antibodies and in situ mRNA hybridization to measure PD-L1 in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using a quantitative fluorescence (QIF) approach to determine the frequency of expression and prognostic value in two independent populations. A control tissue microarray (TMA) was constructed using PD-L1-transfected cells, normal human placenta and known PD-L1-positive NSCLC cases. Only one of four antibodies against PD-L1 (5H1) validated for specificity on this TMA. In situ PD-L1 mRNA using the RNAscope method was similarly validated. Two cohorts of NSCLC cases in TMAs including 340 cases from hospitals in Greece and 204 cases from Yale University were assessed. Tumors showed PD-L1 protein expression in 36% (Greek) and 25% (Yale) of the cases. PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in both cohorts. Patients with PD-L1 (both protein and mRNA) expression above the detection threshold showed statistically significant better outcome in both series (log-rank P=0.036 and P=0.027). Multivariate analysis showed that PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with better outcome independent of histology. Measurement of PD-L1 requires specific conditions and some commercial antibodies show lack of specificity. Expression of PD-L1 protein or mRNA is associated with better outcome. Further studies are required to determine the value of this marker in prognosis and prediction of response to treatments targeting this pathway.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              High expression of PD-L1 in lung cancer may contribute to poor prognosis and tumor cells immune escape through suppressing tumor infiltrating dendritic cells maturation.

              The immunohistochemical analysis was used to evaluate the expression of PD-L1 in 109 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues and para-tumor tissues. Associations between expressed PD-L1 and tumor histological types, degree of differentiation, and lymph node metastasis were calculated, and overall survival was assessed. Meanwhile, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence double labeling technique were performed to detect the expressions of PD-L1, CD1α, and CD83 on TIDC of 20 lung cancer tissues, and the expression of PD-L1 in CD1α+DCs and CD83+DCs and their significances were also explored. We found that the expression rate of PD-L1 in NSCLC was associated with histological types and overall survival. Patients with either adenocarcinoma or survival time after surgery less than 3 years showed higher expression rate of PD-L1. Furthermore, Cox model analysis indicated that PD-L1 might be regarded as a poor prognostic factor. PD-L1 could be also detected in CD1α+ immature DC in NSCLC, indicating that as a class of key anti-tumor immunocyte in tumor microenvironment, DC expressing PD-L1 itself might play an important role in keeping its immature status and contributing to tumor cells immune escape and disease progression.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Mod Pathol
                Mod. Pathol
                Modern Pathology
                Nature Publishing Group
                0893-3952
                1530-0285
                July 2016
                08 April 2016
                : 29
                : 7
                : 753-763
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, VU University Medical Center , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center-Cancer Center Amsterdam , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden , Leiden, The Netherlands
                [4 ]Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [5 ]Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden , Leiden, The Netherlands
                [6 ]Center Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [7 ]Center Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Department of Gynecology, Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                [* ]Center for Gynaecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, VU University Medical Center, Free University Amsterdam , De Boeleaan 1117, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands. E-mail: e.jordanova@ 123456vumc.nl
                Article
                modpathol201664
                10.1038/modpathol.2016.64
                4931542
                27056074
                ce00f508-9c62-4f6b-81ca-5d68bbbfe2a8
                Copyright © 2016 United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History
                : 10 December 2015
                : 13 February 2016
                : 27 February 2016
                Categories
                Original Article

                Pathology
                Pathology

                Comments

                Comment on this article