Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical Survey of Current Perioperative Body Temperature Management: What Major Factors Influence Effective Hypothermia Prevention Practice?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Inadvertent intraoperative hypothermia (IIH) is generally associated with several postoperative complications. Inspite of the existing guidelines, the global incidence of IIH remains unacceptably high. Understanding the conditions that influence temperature management is critical for developing future interventions to improve the postoperative patient outcomes. This study aimed to identify the major factors that hinder the implementation of IIH prevention practices.

          Methods

          Through a literature research, pilot small-sample investigation, and expert suggestions, 11 factors that may hinder the implementation of IIH prevention practices were identified. A questionnaire was developed, and each question was used to assess each factor. After approval by the Research Ethics Board, the questionnaires were sent to the staff anaesthesiologists at two academic hospitals via WeChat. Each answer was coded according to the degree to which the factor was affected, as anticipated. Finally, the answers were analysed based on the 80/20 rule to identify the major barriers to effective temperature management.

          Results

          We included 195 participants. Knowledge, memory, attention and decision processes, beliefs about consequences, and environmental context and resources were the major factors, with cumulative composition ratios of 24%, 43.4%, 57.7%, and 70.7%, respectively. Meanwhile, behavioural regulation and social influence were the secondary factors, with cumulative composition ratios of 80.4% and 87.5%, respectively. Reinforcement, confidence in capacity, duty realisation, skills, and intention were the general factors with cumulative composition ratios of 94.3%, 99.8%, 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively.

          Conclusion

          Four factors–knowledge, memory, attention and decision process, beliefs about consequences, and environmental context and resources–were the major factors that influence the effective hypothermia prevention practice.

          Relevance to Clinical Practice

          These major factors will be used in further studies as a basis to develop the corresponding solutions and improve the patient outcomes in clinical practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Eliminating waste in US health care.

          The need is urgent to bring US health care costs into a sustainable range for both public and private payers. Commonly, programs to contain costs use cuts, such as reductions in payment levels, benefit structures, and eligibility. A less harmful strategy would reduce waste, not value-added care. The opportunity is immense. In just 6 categories of waste--overtreatment, failures of care coordination, failures in execution of care processes, administrative complexity, pricing failures, and fraud and abuse--the sum of the lowest available estimates exceeds 20% of total health care expenditures. The actual total may be far greater. The savings potentially achievable from systematic, comprehensive, and cooperative pursuit of even a fractional reduction in waste are far higher than from more direct and blunter cuts in care and coverage. The potential economic dislocations, however, are severe and require mitigation through careful transition strategies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The effects of mild perioperative hypothermia on blood loss and transfusion requirement.

            Anesthetic-induced hypothermia is known to reduce platelet function and impair enzymes of the coagulation cascade. The objective of this meta-analysis and systematic review was to evaluate the hypothesis that mild perioperative hypothermia increases surgical blood loss and transfusion requirement. The authors conducted a systematic search of published randomized trials that compared blood loss and/or transfusion requirements in normothermic and mildly hypothermic (34-36 degrees C) surgical patients. Results are expressed as a ratio of the means or relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CI); P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Fourteen studies were included in analysis of blood loss, and 10 in the transfusion analysis. The median (quartiles) temperature difference between the normothermic and hypothermic patients among studies was 0.85 degrees C (0.60 degrees C versus 1.1 degrees C). The ratio of geometric means of total blood loss in the normothermic and hypothermic patients was 0.84 (0.74 versus 0.96), P = 0.009. Normothermia also reduced transfusion requirement, with an overall estimated relative risk of 0.78 (95% CI 0.63, 0.97), P = 0.027. Even mild hypothermia (<1 degree C) significantly increases blood loss by approximately 16% (4-26%) and increases the relative risk for transfusion by approximately 22% (3-37%). Maintaining perioperative normothermia reduces blood loss and transfusion requirement by clinically important amounts.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of Wound Infection and Temperature Group.

              Mild perioperative hypothermia, which is common during major surgery, may promote surgical-wound infection by triggering thermoregulatory vasoconstriction, which decreases subcutaneous oxygen tension. Reduced levels of oxygen in tissue impair oxidative killing by neutrophils and decrease the strength of the healing wound by reducing the deposition of collagen. Hypothermia also directly impairs immune function. We tested the hypothesis that hypothermia both increases susceptibility to surgical-wound infection and lengthens hospitalization. Two hundred patients undergoing colorectal surgery were randomly assigned to routine intraoperative thermal care (the hypothermia group) or additional warming (the normothermia group). The patient's anesthetic care was standardized, and they were all given cefamandole and metronidazole. In a double-blind protocol, their wounds were evaluated daily until discharge from the hospital and in the clinic after two weeks; wounds containing culture-positive pus were considered infected. The patients' surgeons remained unaware of the patients' group assignments. The mean (+/- SD) final intraoperative core temperature was 34.7 +/- 0.6 degrees C in the hypothermia group and 36.6 +/- 0.5 degrees C in the normothermia group (P < 0.001) Surgical-wound infections were found in 18 of 96 patients assigned to hypothermia (19 percent) but in only 6 of 104 patients assigned to normothermia (6 percent, P = 0.009). The sutures were removed one day later in the patients assigned to hypothermia than in those assigned to normothermia (P = 0.002), and the duration of hospitalization was prolonged by 2.6 days (approximately 20 percent) in hypothermia group (P = 0.01). Hypothermia itself may delay healing and predispose patients to wound infections. Maintaining normothermia intraoperatively is likely to decrease the incidence of infectious complications in patients undergoing colorectal resection and to shorten their hospitalizations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Multidiscip Healthc
                J Multidiscip Healthc
                jmdh
                Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
                Dove
                1178-2390
                08 August 2022
                2022
                : 15
                : 1689-1696
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and The Research Units of West China (2018RU012), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences , Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
                [2 ]Department of Anesthesiology, Karamay Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine , Karamay, People’s Republic of China
                [3 ]West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University , Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
                [4 ]Department of Anesthesiology, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, Fudan University , Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Yun Shi, Department of Anesthesiology, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, Fudan University , 399 Wanyuan Road, Minhang District, Shanghai, 201102, People’s Republic of China, Email imulashi@yahoo.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8225-0657
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8090-6010
                Article
                376423
                10.2147/JMDH.S376423
                9374200
                35965636
                cde26895-95b4-43cc-9825-104324dbb846
                © 2022 Deng et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 27 May 2022
                : 29 July 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, References: 40, Pages: 8
                Funding
                Funded by: the National Natural Science Foundation of China;
                This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 72074162).
                Categories
                Original Research

                Medicine
                intraoperative hypothermia,body temperature,temperature management,80/20 rule
                Medicine
                intraoperative hypothermia, body temperature, temperature management, 80/20 rule

                Comments

                Comment on this article