4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mec1, INO80, and the PAF1 complex cooperate to limit transcription replication conflicts through RNAPII removal during replication stress

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Poli et al. present genetic and proteomic analyses from budding yeast that uncover links between the DNA replication checkpoint sensor Mec1–Ddc2 (ATR–ATRIP), the chromatin remodeling complex INO80C, and the transcription complex PAF1C. A subset of chromatin-bound RNAPII is degraded in a manner dependent on Mec1, INO80, and PAF1 complexes in cells exposed to hydroxyurea.

          Abstract

          Little is known about how cells ensure DNA replication in the face of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII)-mediated transcription, especially under conditions of replicative stress. Here we present genetic and proteomic analyses from budding yeast that uncover links between the DNA replication checkpoint sensor Mec1–Ddc2 (ATR–ATRIP), the chromatin remodeling complex INO80C (INO80 complex), and the transcription complex PAF1C (PAF1 complex). We found that a subset of chromatin-bound RNAPII is degraded in a manner dependent on Mec1, INO80, and PAF1 complexes in cells exposed to hydroxyurea (HU). On HU, Mec1 triggers the efficient removal of PAF1C and RNAPII from transcribed genes near early firing origins. Failure to evict RNAPII correlates inversely with recovery from replication stress: paf1Δ cells, like ino80 and mec1 mutants, fail to restart forks efficiently after stalling. Our data reveal unexpected synergies between INO80C, Mec1, and PAF1C in the maintenance of genome integrity and suggest a mechanism of RNAPII degradation that reduces transcription–replication fork collision.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Causes and consequences of replication stress.

          Replication stress is a complex phenomenon that has serious implications for genome stability, cell survival and human disease. Generation of aberrant replication fork structures containing single-stranded DNA activates the replication stress response, primarily mediated by the kinase ATR (ATM- and Rad3-related). Along with its downstream effectors, ATR stabilizes and helps to restart stalled replication forks, avoiding the generation of DNA damage and genome instability. Understanding this response may be key to diagnosing and treating human diseases caused by defective responses to replication stress.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            R loops: new modulators of genome dynamics and function.

            R loops are nucleic acid structures composed of an RNA-DNA hybrid and a displaced single-stranded DNA. Recently, evidence has emerged that R loops occur more often in the genome and have greater physiological relevance, including roles in transcription and chromatin structure, than was previously predicted. Importantly, however, R loops are also a major threat to genome stability. For this reason, several DNA and RNA metabolism factors prevent R-loop formation in cells. Dysfunction of these factors causes R-loop accumulation, which leads to replication stress, genome instability, chromatin alterations or gene silencing, phenomena that are frequently associated with cancer and a number of genetic diseases. We review the current knowledge of the mechanisms controlling R loops and their putative relationship with disease.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map.

              Defining the functional relationships between proteins is critical for understanding virtually all aspects of cell biology. Large-scale identification of protein complexes has provided one important step towards this goal; however, even knowledge of the stoichiometry, affinity and lifetime of every protein-protein interaction would not reveal the functional relationships between and within such complexes. Genetic interactions can provide functional information that is largely invisible to protein-protein interaction data sets. Here we present an epistatic miniarray profile (E-MAP) consisting of quantitative pairwise measurements of the genetic interactions between 743 Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes involved in various aspects of chromosome biology (including DNA replication/repair, chromatid segregation and transcriptional regulation). This E-MAP reveals that physical interactions fall into two well-represented classes distinguished by whether or not the individual proteins act coherently to carry out a common function. Thus, genetic interaction data make it possible to dissect functionally multi-protein complexes, including Mediator, and to organize distinct protein complexes into pathways. In one pathway defined here, we show that Rtt109 is the founding member of a novel class of histone acetyltransferases responsible for Asf1-dependent acetylation of histone H3 on lysine 56. This modification, in turn, enables a ubiquitin ligase complex containing the cullin Rtt101 to ensure genomic integrity during DNA replication.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Genes Dev
                Genes Dev
                genesdev
                genesdev
                GAD
                Genes & Development
                Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
                0890-9369
                1549-5477
                1 February 2016
                : 30
                : 3
                : 337-354
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, CH-4058 Basel, Switzerland;
                [2 ]Gene Center, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany;
                [3 ]UPR 1142, Institut de Génétique Humaine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 30396 Montpellier, France;
                [4 ]Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
                Author notes
                [5]

                Present address: The Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada

                [6]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Corresponding author: susan.gasser@ 123456fmi.ch
                Article
                8711660
                10.1101/gad.273813.115
                4743062
                26798134
                cdd0f312-876b-4eb8-b0cc-5e236b1aee8c
                © 2016 Poli et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

                This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genesdev.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 21 October 2015
                : 21 December 2015
                Page count
                Pages: 18
                Funding
                Funded by: Fondation pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
                Funded by: EMBO http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003043
                Award ID: ALTF736-2015
                Funded by: FP7 Marie Curie Intra European Fellowship
                Award ID: 626708
                Funded by: Novartis Research Foundation
                Funded by: Swiss National Science Foundation
                Funded by: Human Frontier Science Program http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000854
                Funded by: European Research Council http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000781
                Award ID: ATMMACHINE
                Funded by: German Research Council
                Award ID: SFB1064
                Funded by: Center for Integrated Protein Science of the German Excellence Initiative
                Categories
                Research Paper

                transcription–replication interference,rnapii,ino80,replication stress,checkpoint,genome instability

                Comments

                Comment on this article