Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Guild-level signature of gut microbiome for diabetic kidney disease

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Current microbiome signatures for chronic diseases such as diabetic kidney disease (DKD) are mainly based on low-resolution taxa such as genus or phyla and are often inconsistent among studies. In microbial ecosystems, bacterial functions are strain specific, and taxonomically different bacteria tend to form co-abundance functional groups called guilds. Here, we identified guild-level signatures for DKD by performing in-depth metagenomic sequencing and conducting genome-centric and guild-based analysis on fecal samples from 116 DKD patients and 91 healthy subjects. Redundancy analysis on 1,543 high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes (HQMAGs) identified 54 HQMAGs that were differentially distributed among the young healthy control group, elderly healthy control group, early-stage DKD patients (EDG), and late-stage DKD patients (LDG). Co-abundance network analysis classified the 54 HQMAGs into two guilds. Compared to guild 2, guild 1 contained more short-chain fatty acid biosynthesis genes and fewer genes encoding uremic toxin indole biosynthesis, antibiotic resistance, and virulence factors. Guild indices, derived from the total abundance of guild members and their diversity, delineated DKD patients from healthy subjects and between different severities of DKD. Age-adjusted partial Spearman correlation analysis showed that the guild indices were correlated with DKD disease progression and with risk indicators of poor prognosis. We further validated that the random forest classification model established with the 54 HQMAGs was also applicable for classifying patients with end-stage renal disease and healthy subjects in an independent data set. Therefore, this genome-level, guild-based microbial analysis strategy may identify DKD patients with different severity at an earlier stage to guide clinical interventions.

          IMPORTANCE

          Traditionally, microbiome research has been constrained by the reliance on taxonomic classifications that may not reflect the functional dynamics or the ecological interactions within microbial communities. By transcending these limitations with a genome-centric and guild-based analysis, our study sheds light on the intricate and specific interactions between microbial strains and diabetic kidney disease (DKD). We have unveiled two distinct microbial guilds with opposite influences on host health, which may redefine our understanding of microbial contributions to disease progression. The implications of our findings extend beyond mere association, providing potential pathways for intervention and opening new avenues for patient stratification in clinical settings. This work paves the way for a paradigm shift in microbiome research in DKD and potentially other chronic kidney diseases, from a focus on taxonomy to a more nuanced view of microbial ecology and function that is more closely aligned with clinical outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis

          Background Correlation networks are increasingly being used in bioinformatics applications. For example, weighted gene co-expression network analysis is a systems biology method for describing the correlation patterns among genes across microarray samples. Weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) can be used for finding clusters (modules) of highly correlated genes, for summarizing such clusters using the module eigengene or an intramodular hub gene, for relating modules to one another and to external sample traits (using eigengene network methodology), and for calculating module membership measures. Correlation networks facilitate network based gene screening methods that can be used to identify candidate biomarkers or therapeutic targets. These methods have been successfully applied in various biological contexts, e.g. cancer, mouse genetics, yeast genetics, and analysis of brain imaging data. While parts of the correlation network methodology have been described in separate publications, there is a need to provide a user-friendly, comprehensive, and consistent software implementation and an accompanying tutorial. Results The WGCNA R software package is a comprehensive collection of R functions for performing various aspects of weighted correlation network analysis. The package includes functions for network construction, module detection, gene selection, calculations of topological properties, data simulation, visualization, and interfacing with external software. Along with the R package we also present R software tutorials. While the methods development was motivated by gene expression data, the underlying data mining approach can be applied to a variety of different settings. Conclusion The WGCNA package provides R functions for weighted correlation network analysis, e.g. co-expression network analysis of gene expression data. The R package along with its source code and additional material are freely available at .
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation.

            T Seemann (2014)
            The multiplex capability and high yield of current day DNA-sequencing instruments has made bacterial whole genome sequencing a routine affair. The subsequent de novo assembly of reads into contigs has been well addressed. The final step of annotating all relevant genomic features on those contigs can be achieved slowly using existing web- and email-based systems, but these are not applicable for sensitive data or integrating into computational pipelines. Here we introduce Prokka, a command line software tool to fully annotate a draft bacterial genome in about 10 min on a typical desktop computer. It produces standards-compliant output files for further analysis or viewing in genome browsers. Prokka is implemented in Perl and is freely available under an open source GPLv2 license from http://vicbioinformatics.com/. © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification.

              We present kallisto, an RNA-seq quantification program that is two orders of magnitude faster than previous approaches and achieves similar accuracy. Kallisto pseudoaligns reads to a reference, producing a list of transcripts that are compatible with each read while avoiding alignment of individual bases. We use kallisto to analyze 30 million unaligned paired-end RNA-seq reads in <10 min on a standard laptop computer. This removes a major computational bottleneck in RNA-seq analysis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                mBio
                mBio
                mbio
                mBio
                American Society for Microbiology (1752 N St., N.W., Washington, DC )
                2150-7511
                July 2024
                31 May 2024
                31 May 2024
                : 15
                : 7
                : e00735-24
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Endocrinology, Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Intestinal Microecology and Diabetes; , Zhengzhou, China
                [2 ]Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology and New Jersey Institute for Food, Nutrition, and Health, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences Rutgers University; , New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
                [3 ]Rutgers-Jiaotong Joint Laboratory for Microbiome and Human Health; , New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
                [4 ]State Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism and Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; , Shanghai, China
                University of Hawaii at Manoa; , Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to Liping Zhao, liping.zhao@ 123456rutgers.edu
                Address correspondence to Huijuan Yuan, hjyuan@ 123456zzu.edu.cn

                Shasha Tang, Guojun Wu, and Yalei Liu contributed equally to this article. The order was determined based on the chronological order of their involvement in the project.

                L.Z. is a co-founder of Notitia Biotechnologies Company.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1307-3124
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7910-2813
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9694-7140
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0486-0994
                Article
                00735-24 mbio.00735-24
                10.1128/mbio.00735-24
                11253615
                38819146
                cdbfb03b-e54d-4ed8-9a11-b0ed70eb9139
                Copyright © 2024 Tang et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

                History
                : 12 March 2024
                : 01 April 2024
                Page count
                supplementary-material: 1, authors: 19, Figures: 6, Tables: 1, References: 65, Pages: 18, Words: 11011
                Categories
                Research Article
                human-microbiome, Human Microbiome
                Custom metadata
                July 2024

                Life sciences
                dkd,guild,gut microbiome
                Life sciences
                dkd, guild, gut microbiome

                Comments

                Comment on this article