57
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Gene expression in Atlantic salmon skin in response to infection with the parasitic copepod Lepeophtheirus salmonis, cortisol implant, and their combination

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The salmon louse is an ectoparasitic copepod that causes major economic losses in the aquaculture industry of Atlantic salmon. This host displays a high level of susceptibility to lice which can be accounted for by several factors including stress. In addition, the parasite itself acts as a potent stressor of the host, and outcomes of infection can depend on biotic and abiotic factors that stimulate production of cortisol. Consequently, examination of responses to infection with this parasite, in addition to stress hormone regulation in Atlantic salmon, is vital for better understanding of the host pathogen interaction.

          Results

          Atlantic salmon post smolts were organised into four experimental groups: lice + cortisol, lice + placebo, no lice + cortisol, no lice + placebo. Infection levels were equal in both treatments upon termination of the experiment. Gene expression changes in skin were assessed with 21 k oligonucleotide microarray and qPCR at the chalimus stage 18 days post infection at 9°C. The transcriptomic effects of hormone treatment were significantly greater than lice-infection induced changes. Cortisol stimulated expression of genes involved in metabolism of steroids and amino acids, chaperones, responses to oxidative stress and eicosanoid metabolism and suppressed genes related to antigen presentation, B and T cells, antiviral and inflammatory responses. Cortisol and lice equally down-regulated a large panel of motor proteins that can be important for wound contraction. Cortisol also suppressed multiple genes involved in wound healing, parts of which were activated by the parasite. Down-regulation of collagens and other structural proteins was in parallel with the induction of proteinases that degrade extracellular matrix (MMP9 and MMP13). Cortisol reduced expression of genes encoding proteins involved in formation of various tissue structures, regulators of cell differentiation and growth factors.

          Conclusions

          These results suggest that cortisol-induced stress does not affect the level of infection of Atlantic salmon with the parasite, however, it may retard repair of skin. The cortisol induced changes are in close concordance with the existing concept of wound healing cascade.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Regulation of wound healing by growth factors and cytokines.

          Cutaneous wound healing is a complex process involving blood clotting, inflammation, new tissue formation, and finally tissue remodeling. It is well described at the histological level, but the genes that regulate skin repair have only partially been identified. Many experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated varied, but in most cases beneficial, effects of exogenous growth factors on the healing process. However, the roles played by endogenous growth factors have remained largely unclear. Initial approaches at addressing this question focused on the expression analysis of various growth factors, cytokines, and their receptors in different wound models, with first functional data being obtained by applying neutralizing antibodies to wounds. During the past few years, the availability of genetically modified mice has allowed elucidation of the function of various genes in the healing process, and these studies have shed light onto the role of growth factors, cytokines, and their downstream effectors in wound repair. This review summarizes the results of expression studies that have been performed in rodents, pigs, and humans to localize growth factors and their receptors in skin wounds. Most importantly, we also report on genetic studies addressing the functions of endogenous growth factors in the wound repair process.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Keratinocyte-fibroblast interactions in wound healing.

            Cutaneous tissue repair aims at restoring the barrier function of the skin. To achieve this, defects need to be replaced by granulation tissue to form new connective tissue, and epithelial wound closure is required to restore the physical barrier. Different wound-healing phases are recognized, starting with an inflammation-dominated early phase giving way to granulation tissue build-up and scar remodeling after epithelial wound closure has been achieved. In the granulation tissue, mesenchymal cells are maximally activated, cells proliferate, and synthesize huge amounts of extracellular matrix. Epithelial cells also proliferate and migrate over the provisional matrix of the underlying granulation tissue, eventually closing the defect. This review focuses on the role of keratinocyte-fibroblast interactions in the wound-healing process. There is ample evidence that keratinocytes stimulate fibroblasts to synthesize growth factors, which in turn will stimulate keratinocyte proliferation in a double paracrine manner. Moreover, fibroblasts can acquire a myofibroblast phenotype under the control of keratinocytes. This depends on a finely tuned balance between a proinflammatory or a transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta-dominated environment. As the phenotype of fibroblasts from different tissues or body sites becomes better defined, we may understand their individual contribution in wound healing in more detail and possibly explain different clinical outcomes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Fibroblast differentiation in wound healing and fibrosis.

              The contraction of granulation tissue from skin wounds was first described in the 1960s. Later it was discovered that during tissue repair, fibroblasts undergo a change in phenotype from their normal relatively quiescent state in which they are involved in slow turnover of the extracellular matrix, to a proliferative and contractile phenotype termed myofibroblasts. These cells show some of the phenotypic characteristics of smooth muscle cells and have been shown to contract in vitro. In the 1990s, a number of researchers in different fields showed that myofibroblasts are present during tissue repair or response to injury in a variety of other tissues, including the liver, kidney, and lung. During normal repair processes, the myofibroblastic cells are lost as repair resolves to form a scar. This cell loss is via apoptosis. In pathological fibroses, myofibroblasts persist in the tissue and are responsible for fibrosis via increased matrix synthesis and for contraction of the tissue. In many cases this expansion of the extracellular matrix impedes normal function of the organ. For this reason much interest has centered on the derivation of myofibroblasts and the factors that influence their differentiation, proliferation, extracellular matrix synthesis, and survival. Further understanding of how fibroblast differentiation and myofibroblast phenotype is controlled may provide valuable insights into future therapies that can control fibrosis and scarring.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Genomics
                BMC Genomics
                BMC Genomics
                BioMed Central
                1471-2164
                2012
                5 April 2012
                : 13
                : 130
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Nofima, Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, P.O. Box 5010, Ås N-1430 Bergin, Norway
                [2 ]Institute of Marine Research, PO Box 1870, Nordnes N-5817 Bergen, Norway
                [3 ]Department of Biology, University of Bergen, Thormølhensgate 55, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
                [4 ]Aquaculture Protein Centre, Department of Animal & Aquacultural Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, N-1432 Ås Bergen, Norway
                Article
                1471-2164-13-130
                10.1186/1471-2164-13-130
                3338085
                22480234
                cdad0d6b-d4f0-480e-b173-df3c7608f8d9
                Copyright ©2012 Krasnov et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 23 November 2011
                : 5 April 2012
                Categories
                Research Article

                Genetics
                Genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article