19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Threat visibility modulates the defensive brain circuit underlying fear and anxiety

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • We used human fMRI and a novel computer-based task to study the effects of visual threat uncertainty on brain activity.

          • Lack of visual threat information increased activity in hippocampus, ventromedial prefrontal cortex and amygdala (regions involved in anxiety).

          • Presence of visual threat information increased activity in periaqueductal gray (involved in fear).

          • High trait-anxiety participants anticipated hippocampal activation when visual threat information was not provided.

          Abstract

          Recent theories distinguish anxiety from fear in the brain. Anxiety is associated with activation in ventromedial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, while fear is associated with activation in periaqueductal gray, with amygdala involved in processing aspects of both emotional responses. These theories propose that the amount of information available about threat determines which of the two defensive responses is elicited, with fear and anxiety associated with well-defined and uncertain threats respectively. However, a direct test of this hypothesis is lacking. Here we provide such a test using fMRI to record participants’ brain activity while they performed a computer-based task which required to press a button to move an artificial agent to a target position while an artificial predator chased the agent. In one condition (associated with fear) the predator was visible, while in another condition (associated with anxiety) the predator was invisible. Ventromedial prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala showed increased activity when the predator was invisible compared to visible, while the opposite effect was observed in periaqueductal gray. We also observed that participants with high but not low trait-anxiety showed an hippocampal activation with invisible threat at an earlier time stage during the trial. These findings help clarify the neural mechanisms that underlie different defensive emotions and shed light on how these mechanisms may contribute to exaggerated anxiety.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The role of the amygdala in fear and anxiety.

          M DAVIS (1992)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Regional dissociations within the hippocampus--memory and anxiety.

            The amnestic effects of hippocampal lesions are well documented, leading to numerous memory-based theories of hippocampal function. It is debatable, however, whether any one of these theories can satisfactorily account for all the consequences of hippocampal damage: Hippocampal lesions also result in behavioural disinhibition and reduced anxiety. A growing number of studies now suggest that these diverse behavioural effects may be associated with different hippocampal subregions. There is evidence for at least two distinct functional domains, although recent neuroanatomical studies suggest this may be an underestimate. Selective lesion studies show that the hippocampus is functionally subdivided along the septotemporal axis into dorsal and ventral regions, each associated with a distinct set of behaviours. Dorsal hippocampus has a preferential role in certain forms of learning and memory, notably spatial learning, but ventral hippocampus may have a preferential role in brain processes associated with anxiety-related behaviours. The latter's role in emotional processing is also distinct from that of the amygdala, which is associated specifically with fear. Gray and McNaughton's theory can in principle incorporate these apparently distinct hippocampal functions, and provides a plausible unitary account for the multiple facets of hippocampal function.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: fear/anxiety and defensive distance.

              We present in this paper a picture of the neural systems controlling defense that updates and simplifies Gray's "Neuropsychology of Anxiety". It is based on two behavioural dimensions: 'defensive distance' as defined by the Blanchards and 'defensive direction'. Defensive direction is a categorical dimension with avoidance of threat corresponding to fear and approach to threat corresponding to anxiety. These two psychological dimensions are mapped to underlying neural dimensions. Defensive distance is mapped to neural level, with the shortest defensive distances involving the lowest neural level (periaqueductal grey) and the largest defensive distances the highest neural level (prefrontal cortex). Defensive direction is mapped to separate parallel streams that run across these levels. A significant departure from prior models is the proposal that both fear and anxiety are represented at all levels. The theory is presented in a simplified form that does not incorporate the interactions that must occur between non-adjacent levels of the system. It also requires expansion to include the dimension of escapability of threat. Our current development and these proposed future extensions do not change the core concepts originally proposed by Gray and, we argue, demonstrate their enduring value.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Neurosci Lett
                Neurosci. Lett
                Neuroscience Letters
                Elsevier Scientific Publishers Ireland
                0304-3940
                1872-7972
                26 January 2016
                26 January 2016
                : 612
                : 7-13
                Affiliations
                [a ]Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging at UCL, London, UK
                [b ]MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging at UCL, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK. f.rigoli@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                Article
                S0304-3940(15)30263-9
                10.1016/j.neulet.2015.11.026
                4729319
                26655466
                cd2ad2c9-62c7-4563-9e85-c74ec1100a66
                © 2015 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 25 August 2015
                : 24 October 2015
                : 16 November 2015
                Categories
                Research Paper

                Neurosciences
                fear,anxiety,uncertainty,hippocampus,pag,amygdala
                Neurosciences
                fear, anxiety, uncertainty, hippocampus, pag, amygdala

                Comments

                Comment on this article