12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Global Overview of Ecosystem Services Provided by Riparian Vegetation

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Fluvial riparian vegetation (RV) links fluvial and terrestrial ecosystems. It is under significant pressure from anthropogenic activities, and, therefore, the management and restoration of RV are increasingly important worldwide. RV has been investigated from different perspectives, so knowledge on its structure and function is widely distributed. An important step forward is to convert existing knowledge into an overview easily accessible—for example, for use in decision-making and management. We aim to provide an overview of ecosystem services provided by RV by adopting a structured approach to identify the ecosystem services, describe their characteristics, and rank the importance of each service. We evaluate each service within four main riparian vegetation types adopting a global perspective to derive a broad concept. Subsequently, we introduce a guided framework for use in RV management based on our structured approach. We also identify knowledge gaps and evaluate the opportunities an ecosystem service approach offers to RV management.

          Related collections

          Most cited references89

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.

            The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) introduced a new framework for analyzing social-ecological systems that has had wide influence in the policy and scientific communities. Studies after the MA are taking up new challenges in the basic science needed to assess, project, and manage flows of ecosystem services and effects on human well-being. Yet, our ability to draw general conclusions remains limited by focus on discipline-bound sectors of the full social-ecological system. At the same time, some polices and practices intended to improve ecosystem services and human well-being are based on untested assumptions and sparse information. The people who are affected and those who provide resources are increasingly asking for evidence that interventions improve ecosystem services and human well-being. New research is needed that considers the full ensemble of processes and feedbacks, for a range of biophysical and social systems, to better understand and manage the dynamics of the relationship between humans and the ecosystems on which they rely. Such research will expand the capacity to address fundamental questions about complex social-ecological systems while evaluating assumptions of policies and practices intended to advance human well-being through improved ecosystem services.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              THE ECOLOGY OF INTERFACES:Riparian Zones

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BioScience
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0006-3568
                1525-3244
                June 2020
                June 01 2020
                May 06 2020
                June 2020
                June 01 2020
                May 06 2020
                : 70
                : 6
                : 501-514
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, in Aarhus, Denmark
                [2 ]School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
                [3 ]Forest Research Centre, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
                [4 ]Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
                [5 ]Instituto Pirenaíco de Ecología, Zaragoza, Spain
                [6 ]Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
                [7 ]Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Universidad del Rosario, in Bogotá, Colombia
                [8 ]Ecosystems Research Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
                [9 ]Research Center on Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
                [10 ]Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia
                [11 ]University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
                [12 ]University of Rennes, Rennes, France
                Article
                10.1093/biosci/biaa041
                cc2efad5-8bfb-410c-b550-6cb71c838a8c
                © 2020

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article