41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Recommendations to distinguish behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from psychiatric disorders

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 3 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 3 , 13 , 14 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 5 , 16 , 17 , 17 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 24 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 29 , 30 , 8 , 31 , 32 , 5 , 33 , 9
      Brain
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is a frequent cause of early-onset dementia. The diagnosis of bvFTD remains challenging because of the limited accuracy of neuroimaging in the early disease stages and the absence of molecular biomarkers, and therefore relies predominantly on clinical assessment. BvFTD shows significant symptomatic overlap with non-degenerative primary psychiatric disorders including major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, autism spectrum disorders and even personality disorders. To date, ∼50% of patients with bvFTD receive a prior psychiatric diagnosis, and average diagnostic delay is up to 5–6 years from symptom onset. It is also not uncommon for patients with primary psychiatric disorders to be wrongly diagnosed with bvFTD. The Neuropsychiatric International Consortium for Frontotemporal Dementia was recently established to determine the current best clinical practice and set up an international collaboration to share a common dataset for future research. The goal of the present paper was to review the existing literature on the diagnosis of bvFTD and its differential diagnosis with primary psychiatric disorders to provide consensus recommendations on the clinical assessment. A systematic literature search with a narrative review was performed to determine all bvFTD-related diagnostic evidence for the following topics: bvFTD history taking, psychiatric assessment, clinical scales, physical and neurological examination, bedside cognitive tests, neuropsychological assessment, social cognition, structural neuroimaging, functional neuroimaging, CSF and genetic testing. For each topic, responsible team members proposed a set of minimal requirements, optimal clinical recommendations, and tools requiring further research or those that should be developed. Recommendations were listed if they reached a ≥ 85% expert consensus based on an online survey among all consortium participants. New recommendations include performing at least one formal social cognition test in the standard neuropsychological battery for bvFTD. We emphasize the importance of 3D-T1 brain MRI with a standardized review protocol including validated visual atrophy rating scales, and to consider volumetric analyses if available. We clarify the role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET for the exclusion of bvFTD when normal, whereas non-specific regional metabolism abnormalities should not be over-interpreted in the case of a psychiatric differential diagnosis. We highlight the potential role of serum or CSF neurofilament light chain to differentiate bvFTD from primary psychiatric disorders. Finally, based on the increasing literature and clinical experience, the consortium determined that screening for C9orf72 mutation should be performed in all possible/probable bvFTD cases or suspected cases with strong psychiatric features.

          Related collections

          Most cited references138

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A brief cognitive test battery to differentiate Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia.

          To validate a simple bedside test battery designed to detect mild dementia and differentiate AD from frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE) is a 100-point test battery that assesses six cognitive domains. Of 210 new patients attending a memory clinic, 139 fulfilled inclusion criteria and comprised dementia (n = 115) and nondementia (n = 24) groups. The composite and the component scores on the ACE for the two groups were compared with those of 127 age- and education-matched controls. Norms and the probability of diagnosing dementia at different prevalence rates were calculated. To evaluate the ACE's ability to differentiate early AD from FTD, scores of the cases diagnosed with dementia with a Clinical Dementia Rating 3.2 for AD was highly discriminating. The ACE is a brief and reliable bedside instrument for early detection of dementia, and offers a simple objective index to differentiate AD and FTD in mildly demented patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The epidemiology of frontotemporal dementia.

            Frontotemporal dementia, a heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder, is a common cause of young onset dementia (i.e. dementia developing in midlife or earlier). The estimated point prevalence is 15-22/100,000, and incidence 2.7-4.1/100,000. Some 25% are late-life onset cases. Population studies show nearly equal distribution by gender, which contrasts with myriad clinical and neuropathology reports. FTD is frequently familial and hereditary; five genetic loci for causal mutations have been identified, all showing 100% penetrance. Non-genetic risk factors are yet to be identified. FTD shows poor life expectancy but with survival comparable to that of Alzheimer's disease. Recent progress includes the formulation of up-to-date diagnostic criteria for the behavioural and language variants, and the development of new and urgently needed instruments for monitoring and staging the illness. There is still need for descriptive population studies to fill gaps in our knowledge about minority groups and developing regions. More pressing, however, is the need for reliable physiological markers for disease. There is a present imperative to develop a translational science to form the conduit for transferring neurobiological discoveries and insights from bench to bedside.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The diagnostic challenge of psychiatric symptoms in neurodegenerative disease: rates of and risk factors for prior psychiatric diagnosis in patients with early neurodegenerative disease.

              To identify rates of and risk factors for psychiatric diagnosis preceding the diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease. Systematic, retrospective, blinded chart review was performed of 252 patients with a neurodegenerative disease diagnosis seen in our specialty clinic between 1999 and 2008. Neurodegenerative disease diagnoses included behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (n = 69), semantic dementia (n = 41), and progressive nonfluent aphasia (n = 17) (all meeting Neary research criteria); Alzheimer's disease (n = 65) (National Institute of Neurologic and Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association research criteria); corticobasal degeneration (n = 25) (Boxer research criteria); progressive supranuclear palsy (n = 15) (Litvan research criteria); and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (n = 20) (El Escorial research criteria). Reviewers remained blinded to each patient's final neurodegenerative disease diagnosis while reviewing charts. Extensive caregiver interviews were conducted to ensure accurate and reliable diagnostic histories. For each patient, we recorded history of psychiatric diagnosis, family psychiatric and neurologic history, age at symptom onset, and demographic information. A total of 28.2% of patients with a neurodegenerative disease received a prior psychiatric diagnosis. Depression was the most common psychiatric diagnosis in all groups. Behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia patients received a prior psychiatric diagnosis significantly more often (50.7%; P < .001) than patients with Alzheimer's disease (23.1%), semantic dementia (24.4%), or progressive nonfluent aphasia (11.8%) and were more likely to receive diagnoses of bipolar disorder or schizophrenia than were patients with other neurodegenerative diseases (P < .001). Younger age (P < .001), higher education (P < .05), and a family history of psychiatric illness (P < .05) increased the rate of prior psychiatric diagnosis in patients with behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia. Cognitive, behavioral, and emotional characteristics did not distinguish patients who did or did not receive a prior psychiatric diagnosis. Neurodegenerative disease is often misclassified as psychiatric disease, with behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia patients at highest risk. While this study cannot rule out the possibility that psychiatric disease is an independent risk factor for neurodegenerative disease, when patients with neurodegenerative disease are initially classified with psychiatric disease, the patient may receive delayed, inappropriate treatment and be subject to increased distress. Physicians should consider referring mid- to late-life patients with new-onset neuropsychiatric symptoms for neurodegenerative disease evaluation. © Copyright 2011 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Brain
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0006-8950
                1460-2156
                March 04 2020
                March 04 2020
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychiatry, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
                [2 ]McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, 3801 University Str., Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2B4, Canada
                [3 ]Department of Old Age Psychiatry, GGZ InGeest, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [4 ]Clinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire (CIME), Laval University, Quebec, Canada
                [5 ]Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
                [6 ]Laboratory for Translational Neuropsychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
                [7 ]CERVO brain Research Centre, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
                [8 ]Department of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [9 ]Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [10 ]Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer’s Disease and the Aging Brain, Department of Psychiatry, Colombia University, New York, USA
                [11 ]Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
                [12 ]Department of Neurology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
                [13 ]Division of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neuropsychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
                [14 ]Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology Research Group, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
                [15 ]Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
                [16 ]Division of Clinical Sciences Helsingborg, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
                [17 ]Neuropsychiatry Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
                [18 ]Department of Psychiatry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
                [19 ]Department of Neurology, UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
                [20 ]Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, USA
                [21 ]Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
                [22 ]Department of Neurology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
                [23 ]Department of Neurology, UCLA Medical Centre, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
                [24 ]Department of Neurology, Hôpital La Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
                [25 ]Department of Psychology, Andes University, Bogota, Colombia
                [26 ]Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, USA
                [27 ]Department of Neurology, Manipal Hospital and Annasawmy Mudaliar Hospital, Bangalore, India
                [28 ]Univ Lille, Inserm U1171, Memory Center, CHU Lille, DISTAlz, Lille, France
                [29 ]Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Centro Dino Ferrari, Milan, Italy
                [30 ]Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Policlinico, Neurodegenerative Diseases Unit Milan, Italy
                [31 ]Department of Medicine, Norwich Medical School, Norwich, UK
                [32 ]Memory and Aging Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
                [33 ]Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
                Article
                10.1093/brain/awaa018
                7849953
                32129844
                cbd42b78-cb1c-46ff-a840-bfba15f352b4
                © 2020

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article