2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Assessment of basin-scale groundwater potentiality mapping in drought-prone upper Dwarakeshwar River basin, West Bengal, India, using GIS-based AHP techniques

      ,
      Arabian Journal of Geosciences
      Springer Science and Business Media LLC

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references87

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Global-scale modeling of groundwater recharge

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              GIS-based groundwater potential mapping using boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and random forest machine learning models in Iran.

              Groundwater is considered one of the most valuable fresh water resources. The main objective of this study was to produce groundwater spring potential maps in the Koohrang Watershed, Chaharmahal-e-Bakhtiari Province, Iran, using three machine learning models: boosted regression tree (BRT), classification and regression tree (CART), and random forest (RF). Thirteen hydrological-geological-physiographical (HGP) factors that influence locations of springs were considered in this research. These factors include slope degree, slope aspect, altitude, topographic wetness index (TWI), slope length (LS), plan curvature, profile curvature, distance to rivers, distance to faults, lithology, land use, drainage density, and fault density. Subsequently, groundwater spring potential was modeled and mapped using CART, RF, and BRT algorithms. The predicted results from the three models were validated using the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC). From 864 springs identified, 605 (≈70 %) locations were used for the spring potential mapping, while the remaining 259 (≈30 %) springs were used for the model validation. The area under the curve (AUC) for the BRT model was calculated as 0.8103 and for CART and RF the AUC were 0.7870 and 0.7119, respectively. Therefore, it was concluded that the BRT model produced the best prediction results while predicting locations of springs followed by CART and RF models, respectively. Geospatially integrated BRT, CART, and RF methods proved to be useful in generating the spring potential map (SPM) with reasonable accuracy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Arabian Journal of Geosciences
                Arab J Geosci
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                1866-7511
                1866-7538
                June 2021
                May 24 2021
                June 2021
                : 14
                : 11
                Article
                10.1007/s12517-021-07316-8
                cbcc3a70-5133-490d-9242-fafdfb833515
                © 2021

                https://www.springer.com/tdm

                https://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article