55
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol, and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2): a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial

      research-article
      , Prof, FRCP a , ** , , Prof, FRCP b , , PhD b , , Prof, FMedSci c , , Prof, FRCP d , , Prof, FRCP e , , Prof, PhD f , , Prof, FRCP g , , Prof, FMedSci h , , Prof, RGN i , , FRCP b , , FRCP e , , Prof, FMedSci i , * , The British Hypertension Society's PATHWAY Studies Group
      Lancet (London, England)
      Elsevier

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Optimal drug treatment for patients with resistant hypertension is undefined. We aimed to test the hypotheses that resistant hypertension is most often caused by excessive sodium retention, and that spironolactone would therefore be superior to non-diuretic add-on drugs at lowering blood pressure.

          Methods

          In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial, we enrolled patients aged 18–79 years with seated clinic systolic blood pressure 140 mm Hg or greater (or ≥135 mm Hg for patients with diabetes) and home systolic blood pressure (18 readings over 4 days) 130 mm Hg or greater, despite treatment for at least 3 months with maximally tolerated doses of three drugs, from 12 secondary and two primary care sites in the UK. Patients rotated, in a preassigned, randomised order, through 12 weeks of once daily treatment with each of spironolactone (25–50 mg), bisoprolol (5–10 mg), doxazosin modified release (4–8 mg), and placebo, in addition to their baseline blood pressure drugs. Random assignment was done via a central computer system. Investigators and patients were masked to the identity of drugs, and to their sequence allocation. The dose was doubled after 6 weeks of each cycle. The hierarchical primary endpoints were the difference in averaged home systolic blood pressure between spironolactone and placebo, followed (if significant) by the difference in home systolic blood pressure between spironolactone and the average of the other two active drugs, followed by the difference in home systolic blood pressure between spironolactone and each of the other two drugs. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered with EudraCT number 2008-007149-30, and ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02369081.

          Findings

          Between May 15, 2009, and July 8, 2014, we screened 436 patients, of whom 335 were randomly assigned. After 21 were excluded, 285 patients received spironolactone, 282 doxazosin, 285 bisoprolol, and 274 placebo; 230 patients completed all treatment cycles. The average reduction in home systolic blood pressure by spironolactone was superior to placebo (–8·70 mm Hg [95% CI −9·72 to −7·69]; p<0·0001), superior to the mean of the other two active treatments (doxazosin and bisoprolol; −4·26 [–5·13 to −3·38]; p<0·0001), and superior when compared with the individual treatments; versus doxazosin (–4·03 [–5·04 to −3·02]; p<0·0001) and versus bisoprolol (–4·48 [–5·50 to −3·46]; p<0·0001). Spironolactone was the most effective blood pressure-lowering treatment, throughout the distribution of baseline plasma renin; but its margin of superiority and likelihood of being the best drug for the individual patient were many-fold greater in the lower than higher ends of the distribution. All treatments were well tolerated. In six of the 285 patients who received spironolactone, serum potassium exceeded 6·0 mmol/L on one occasion.

          Interpretation

          Spironolactone was the most effective add-on drug for the treatment of resistant hypertension. The superiority of spironolactone supports a primary role of sodium retention in this condition.

          Funding

          The British Heart Foundation and National Institute for Health Research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effect of spironolactone on blood pressure in subjects with resistant hypertension.

            Spironolactone is recommended as fourth-line therapy for essential hypertension despite few supporting data for this indication. We evaluated the effect among 1411 participants in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm who received spironolactone mainly as a fourth-line antihypertensive agent for uncontrolled blood pressure and who had valid BP measurements before and during spironolactone treatment. Among those who received spironolactone, the mean age was 63 years (SD: +/-8 years), 77% were men, and 40% had diabetes. Spironolactone was initiated a median of 3.2 years (interquartile range: 2.0 to 4.4 years) after randomization and added to a mean of 2.9 (SD: +/-0.9) other antihypertensive drugs. The median duration of spironolactone treatment was 1.3 years (interquartile range: 0.6 to 2.6 years). The median dose of spironolactone was 25 mg (interquartile range: 25 to 50 mg) at both the start and end of the observation period. During spironolactone therapy, mean blood pressure fell from 156.9/85.3 mm Hg (SD: +/-18.0/11.5 mm Hg) by 21.9/9.5 mm Hg (95% CI: 20.8 to 23.0/9.0 to 10.1 mm Hg; P<0.001); the BP reduction was largely unaffected by age, sex, smoking, and diabetic status. Spironolactone was generally well tolerated; 6% of participants discontinued the drug because of adverse effects. The most frequent adverse events were gynecomastia or breast discomfort and biochemical abnormalities (principally hyperkaliemia), which were recorded as adverse events in 6% and 2% of participants, respectively. In conclusion, spironolactone effectively lowers blood pressure in patients with hypertension uncontrolled by a mean of approximately 3 other drugs. Although nonrandomized and not placebo controlled, these data support the use of spironolactone in uncontrolled hypertension.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Somatic mutations in ATP1A1 and CACNA1D underlie a common subtype of adrenal hypertension.

              At least 5% of individuals with hypertension have adrenal aldosterone-producing adenomas (APAs). Gain-of-function mutations in KCNJ5 and apparent loss-of-function mutations in ATP1A1 and ATP2A3 were reported to occur in APAs. We find that KCNJ5 mutations are common in APAs resembling cortisol-secreting cells of the adrenal zona fasciculata but are absent in a subset of APAs resembling the aldosterone-secreting cells of the adrenal zona glomerulosa. We performed exome sequencing of ten zona glomerulosa-like APAs and identified nine with somatic mutations in either ATP1A1, encoding the Na(+)/K(+) ATPase α1 subunit, or CACNA1D, encoding Cav1.3. The ATP1A1 mutations all caused inward leak currents under physiological conditions, and the CACNA1D mutations induced a shift of voltage-dependent gating to more negative voltages, suppressed inactivation or increased currents. Many APAs with these mutations were <1 cm in diameter and had been overlooked on conventional adrenal imaging. Recognition of the distinct genotype and phenotype for this subset of APAs could facilitate diagnosis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Lancet
                Lancet
                Lancet (London, England)
                Elsevier
                0140-6736
                1474-547X
                21 November 2015
                21 November 2015
                : 386
                : 10008
                : 2059-2068
                Affiliations
                [a ]Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University College London and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) UCL/UCL Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
                [b ]Medicines Monitoring Unit, Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
                [c ]Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK
                [d ]International Centre for Circulatory Health, Imperial College, London, UK
                [e ]BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
                [f ]Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Glasgow University, Glasgow, UK
                [g ]Cardiovascular Medicine & Diabetes, King's College London, London, UK
                [h ]William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
                [i ]Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence to: Prof Morris J Brown, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UKCorrespondence to: Prof Morris J BrownClinical Pharmacology UnitAddenbrooke's HospitalCambridgeCB2 0QQUK m.j.brown@ 123456cai.cam.ac.uk
                [** ]Prof Bryan Williams, UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, Maple House, First Floor, Suite A, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UKProf Bryan WilliamsUCL Institute of Cardiovascular ScienceMaple HouseFirst FloorSuite A149 Tottenham Court RoadLondonW1T 7DNUK bryan.williams@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                [†]

                Members listed in the appendix

                Article
                S0140-6736(15)00257-3
                10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00257-3
                4655321
                26414968
                cbca00b5-fa2c-442e-b514-b23358f94d42
                © 2015 Williams et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Articles

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article