27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Estudo de vocábulos para avaliação de crianças com deficiência sem linguagem oral Translated title: Study of words for assessing non-speaking children with disabilities

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Pesquisadores da área de comunicação suplementar e alternativa consideram a falta de instrumentos para avaliar crianças e jovens com necessidade complexa de comunicação. Este trabalho objetivou selecionar vocábulos para um instrumento de avaliação do repertório de vocabulário de crianças não-oralizadas com idade de dois a 11 anos e 11 meses. Para a seleção dos vocábulos foram realizados três estudos. O primeiro estudo identificou e descreveu instrumentos disponíveis para avaliação do vocabulário receptivo e suas listas de vocábulos. O segundo estudo identificou e descreveu pesquisas que apresentaram inventários ou listas de vocábulos empregados por crianças e seus parceiros de comunicação. O terceiro estudo identificou o vocabulário relatado por pais e professores. Os vocábulos identificados nos três estudos foram analisados de acordo com: o número de ocorrência dos vocábulos; a classificação do sistema Picture Communication Symbols e uma classificação semântica e sintática. A partir dos estudos foram estabelecidos como critérios para a seleção dos vocábulos: os 45 vocábulos presentes nos três estudos; os vocábulos que tiveram ocorrência maior ou igual a cinco, considerando os três estudos, representando 167 (14,14%) vocábulos; os vocábulos que estiveram presentes no estudo 1 ou 2, mas que foram citados pelas famílias, 183 (19,37% de 945 vocábulos) ou pelas professoras 108 (11,43% de 945 vocábulos). A lista de vocábulos apresentou 269 itens, classificadas em 18 temas semânticos e sintático e representa um instrumento inicial para profissionais da saúde e educação estabelecerem metas para a avaliação inicial de crianças e jovens usuários de sistemas de comunicação suplementar e alternativa.

          Translated abstract

          Researchers in the field of Augmentative and Alternative Communication point out the lack of instruments for assessing children and young people with a complex communication needs. This study's focus is the selection of words for creating an instrument for the vocabulary range in non-speaking children aged two to eleven years and eleven months. Three studies were performed. The first study identified and described tools available for assessing receptive vocabulary and their respective word lists. The second identified and described research that presented word inventories or word lists. The third study identified the vocabulary reported by parents and teachers. The words that were identified in the three studies were analyzed according to: the number of times they occurred; the Picture Communication Symbols system classification; and a semantic and syntactic classification. Based on these studies the following criteria for vocabulary selection were established for word selection: the 45 words which appeared in all three studies, the words that occurred five times or more, considering the three studies, representing 167 (14.14%) words; the words identified in study one or two, but that had been reported by the families - 183 (19.37% out of 945 words) - or by teachers - 108 (11.43% out of 945 words). The word list was composed of 269 items, classified in 18 semantic and syntactic topics; it represents an initial tool for professionals in the field of health and education to set goals for beginning assessment of children and teenagers who are users of Augmentative and Alternative Communication systems.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Low back pain in adult female caregivers of children with physical disabilities.

          Low back pain (LBP) in occupational settings has been studied extensively. There are fewer studies on LBP in domestic settings, especially in an informal caregiving setting. To compare the prevalence of LBP in adult female primary caregivers of children with physical disabilities who need assistance with transfers (eg, moving from a bed to a wheelchair) with the prevalence of LBP in adult female primary caregivers of children with nondisabling medical illnesses and to evaluate the factors associated with LBP. A 15-minute, self-administered, cross-sectional survey. University-based clinics. Subjects Ninety consecutive adult female caregivers of children presenting to a pediatric physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic and 23 consecutive adult female caregivers of children presenting to a pediatric endocrine clinic were studied. General exclusionary criteria included the following: male sex, a history of back surgery or fracture, the caregiver was younger than 18 years old at the time of the completion of the questionnaire, or the caregiver was caring for any child younger than 2 years old. Caregivers visiting the pediatric endocrine clinic were excluded if they were caring for 1 or more children needing assistance with transfers. The dependent variable was the presence of LBP. The independent variables were mood, work status, amount of lifting at work, physical functioning of the child, demographic variables of the caregiver, and demographic variables of the child. The prevalence of having LBP (71.1%) in the physical medicine and rehabilitation group is higher than the prevalence (43.5%) in the endocrine clinic group (odds ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-8.21). The prevalence of having LBP (80.3%) when the child required physical assistance with transfers was significantly higher than the prevalence (40.5%) when the child did not require physical assistance with transfers (odds ratio, 2.56; 95% confidence interval, 2.56-14.0). Forward multiple logistic regression showed that the factors related to LBP in the caregiver were the transferability of the child, mood of the caregiver, and a history of LBP in the caregiver. The prevalence of LBP is higher in caregivers of children needing assistance with transfers. This increased prevalence is associated with the transferability of the child and mood of the caregiver. Results of this study suggest that physical and psychological factors both contribute to the presence of nonoccupational LBP.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Anais....

            (2000)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Desenvolvimento linguístico da criança dos 2 aos 6 anos: Tradução e estandardização do Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test de Dunn & Dunn, e da Language Development Survey de Rescorla

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                rbee
                Revista Brasileira de Educação Especial
                Rev. bras. educ. espec.
                Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Educação Especial - ABPEE (Marília )
                1980-5470
                March 2014
                : 20
                : 1
                : 37-52
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Universidade Estadual Paulista Brazil
                [2 ] UNIVESP
                [3 ] Universidade Estadual Paulista Brazil
                Article
                S1413-65382014000100004
                10.1590/S1413-65382014000100004
                cabbbe67-bd25-4730-b8b9-59fa36b028e2

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Self URI (journal page): http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1413-6538&lng=en
                Categories
                EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
                EDUCATION, SPECIAL

                Educational research & Statistics,Special education
                Augmentative and Alternative Communication,Cerebral Palsy,Vocabulary,Child Language,Educação Especial,Sistemas de Comunicação Alternativos e Suplementares,Paralisia Cerebral,Vocabulário,Special Education,Linguagem Infantil

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                8
                0
                3
                0
                Smart Citations
                8
                0
                3
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content246

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors254