1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Immunocontraception of male and female giraffes using the GnRH vaccine Improvac®

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of this study was to develop protocols for contraception in both sexes of giraffes ( Giraffa camelopardalis) by using the GnRH vaccine Improvac®. We evaluated the success of immunization by analyzing fecal reproductive hormone metabolites in female ( n = 20) and male ( n = 9) giraffes. Endocrine analysis provided the basis for the successful immunization protocol, as well as for assessing long‐term effects. Reliable reduction of fecal steroid metabolites to baseline levels in female giraffes was achieved with three, and in males with four or five injections at 4‐week intervals. Effective booster injections were administered at 2‐month intervals in the first year of treatment and at three to 4‐month intervals in the following years. In addition to endocrine analysis, we determined vaccination efficacy in bulls by assessing testicular atrophy. Long‐term (>2 years) use in females was often accompanied by prolonged periods of persistent corpus luteum activity, although normal cycles were not observed. Problems might occur with reversibility, because in a few males and females, even after more than 2 years since treatment had been stopped, fecal hormone metabolites have not returned to pretreatment levels. The results are somewhat ambiguous, as reproduction can be suppressed by use of Improvac®, but the question of reversibility remains unsolved.

          Abstract

          I Protocols for contraception using the GnRH vaccine Improvac® were developed. A clear reduction of fecal hormone metabolites in female giraffes was achieved with three, and in males with four or five injections at 4‐week intervals. Effective booster injections were administered at 2‐month intervals in the first, and at three to 4‐month intervals in the following years.

          RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS

          • Contraceptive efficacy of Improvac® treatment was achieved in both, female and male giraffes.

          • Fecal hormone metabolite analysis was used for establishing an effective contraception via vaccination.

          • The recommended protocol comprises three Improvac® injections in female and four or five injections in male giraffes, each to be administered at 4‐week intervals. After this basic immunization, booster injections should be given at 2‐month intervals during the first year of treatment and at 3‐ to 4‐month intervals in the following years. These immunization protocols lead to reliable suppression of fecal reproductive steroid hormone metabolites.

          • Vaccination success in males can be monitored by observing testicular atrophy.

          • Reversibility remains questionable.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Multi-locus Analyses Reveal Four Giraffe Species Instead of One

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The many uses of non-invasive faecal steroid monitoring in zoo and wildlife species

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Contraceptive vaccines for wildlife: a review.

              Wildlife, free-ranging and captive, poses and causes serious population problems not unlike those encountered with human overpopulation. Traditional lethal control programs, however, are not always legal, wise, safe, or publicly acceptable; thus, alternative approaches are necessary. Immunocontraception of free-ranging wildlife has reached the management level, with success across a large variety of species. Thus far, the immunocontraceptive research and management applications emphasis have been centered on porcine zona pellucida and gonadotropin-releasing hormone vaccines. Contraceptive success has been achieved in more than 85 different wildlife species, at the level of both the individual animal and the population. At the population management level with free-ranging species, the primary focus has been on wild horses, urban deer, bison, and African elephants. The challenges in the development and application of vaccine-based wildlife contraceptives are diverse and include differences in efficacy across species, safety of vaccines during pregnancy, the development of novel delivery systems for wild and wary free-ranging animals, and the constraints of certain non-contraceptive effects, such as effects on behavior. Beyond the constraints imposed by the public and a host of regulatory concerns, there exists a real limitation for funding of well-designed programs that apply this type of fertility control. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Franz.Schwarzenberger@vetmeduni.ac.at
                Journal
                Zoo Biol
                Zoo Biol
                10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2361
                ZOO
                Zoo Biology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0733-3188
                1098-2361
                03 September 2021
                January 2022
                : 41
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1002/zoo.v41.1 )
                : 50-64
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Biomedical Sciences, Physiology—Endocrinology University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna Austria
                [ 2 ] ZOOM Erlebniswelt Gelsenkirchen Germany
                [ 3 ] Zoo Frankfurt Frankfurt am Main Germany
                [ 4 ] Tiergarten Schönbrunn Vienna Austria
                [ 5 ] Wilhelma ‐ der zoologisch‐botanische Garten Stuttgart Germany
                [ 6 ] Tierpark Berlin‐Friedrichsfelde Berlin Germany
                [ 7 ] Zoo‐Aquarium de Madrid Madrid Spain
                [ 8 ] Zoo de Lyon Lyon France
                [ 9 ] Zoo Karlsruhe Karlsruhe Germany
                [ 10 ] GaiaZoo Kerkrade The Netherlands
                [ 11 ] AG Zoologischer Garten Köln Cologne Germany
                [ 12 ] Zoo Odense Odense Denmark
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence Franz Schwarzenberger, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Physiolog—Endocrinology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria.

                Email: Franz.Schwarzenberger@ 123456vetmeduni.ac.at

                Article
                ZOO21651
                10.1002/zoo.21651
                9292419
                34478196
                cabafd3a-33e7-424d-8e07-3d2117adcf52
                © 2021 The Authors. Zoo Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 24 June 2021
                : 19 October 2020
                : 19 August 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 2, Pages: 15, Words: 8758
                Funding
                Funded by: VetmedUni Vienna and the zoological institutions
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                January 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.7 mode:remove_FC converted:18.07.2022

                contraception efficacy and reversibility,endocrine monitoring,reproduction management

                Comments

                Comment on this article