4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Levetiracetam Reduced the Basal Excitability of the Dentate Gyrus without Restoring Impaired Synaptic Plasticity in Rats with Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), the most common type of focal epilepsy, affects learning and memory; these effects are thought to emerge from changes in synaptic plasticity. Levetiracetam (LEV) is a widely used antiepileptic drug that is also associated with the reversal of cognitive dysfunction. The long-lasting effect of LEV treatment and its participation in synaptic plasticity have not been explored in early chronic epilepsy. Therefore, through the measurement of evoked field potentials, this study aimed to comprehensively identify the alterations in the excitability and the short-term (depression/facilitation) and long-term synaptic plasticity (long-term potentiation, LTP) of the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus in a lithium–pilocarpine rat model of TLE, as well as their possible restoration by LEV (1 week; 300 mg/kg/day). TLE increased the population spike (PS) amplitude (input/output curve); interestingly, LEV treatment partially reduced this hyperexcitability. Furthermore, TLE augmented synaptic depression, suppressed paired-pulse facilitation, and reduced PS-LTP; however, LEV did not alleviate such alterations. Conversely, the excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP)-LTP of TLE rats was comparable to that of control rats and was decreased by LEV. LEV caused a long-lasting attenuation of basal hyperexcitability but did not restore impaired synaptic plasticity in the early chronic phase of TLE.

          Related collections

          Most cited references82

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Modification of seizure activity by electrical stimulation: II. Motor seizure

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Estimation of the burden of active and life-time epilepsy: A meta-analytic approach

            Purpose To estimate the burden of lifetime epilepsy (LTE) and active epilepsy (AE) and examine the influence of study characteristics on prevalence estimates. Methods We searched online databases and identified articles using prespecified criteria. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate the median prevalence in developed countries and in urban and rural settings in developing countries. The impact of study characteristics on prevalence estimates was determined using meta-regression models. Results The median LTE prevalence for developed countries was 5.8 per 1,000 (5th–95th percentile range 2.7–12.4) compared to 15.4 per 1,000 (4.8–49.6) for rural and 10.3 (2.8–37.7) for urban studies in developing countries. The median prevalence of AE was 4.9 per 1,000 (2.3–10.3) for developed countries and 12.7 per 1,000 (3.5–45.5) and 5.9 (3.4–10.2) in rural and urban studies in developing countries. The estimates of burden for LTE and AE in developed countries were 6.8 million (5th–95th percentile range 3.2–14.7) and 5.7 million (2.7–12.2), respectively. In developing countries these were 45 (14–145) million LTE and 17 (10–133) million AE in rural areas and 17 (5–61) million LTE and 10 (5–17) million AE in urban areas. Studies involving all ages or only adults showed higher estimates than pediatric studies. Higher prevalence estimates were also associated with rural location and small study size. Conclusions This study estimates the global burden of epilepsy and the proportions with AE, which may benefit from treatment. There are systematic differences in reported prevalence estimates, which are only partially explained by study characteristics.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Variations on an inhibitory theme: phasic and tonic activation of GABA(A) receptors.

              The proper functioning of the adult mammalian brain relies on the orchestrated regulation of neural activity by a diverse population of GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid)-releasing neurons. Until recently, our appreciation of GABA-mediated inhibition focused predominantly on the GABA(A) (GABA type A) receptors located at synaptic contacts, which are activated in a transient or 'phasic' manner by GABA that is released from synaptic vesicles. However, there is growing evidence that low concentrations of ambient GABA can persistently activate certain subtypes of GABA(A) receptor, which are often remote from synapses, to generate a 'tonic' conductance. In this review, we consider the distinct roles of synaptic and extrasynaptic GABA receptor subtypes in the control of neuronal excitability.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Brain Sci
                Brain Sci
                brainsci
                Brain Sciences
                MDPI
                2076-3425
                11 September 2020
                September 2020
                : 10
                : 9
                : 634
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Laboratorio de Neurociencias, Subdirección de Medicina Experimental, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de Mexico 04530, Mexico; gohegui@ 123456gmail.com (G.G.-H.); jatziri1984@ 123456hotmail.com (I.J.C.-G.); karlasanchezhuerta@ 123456hotmail.com (K.S.-H.)
                [2 ]Departamento de Fisiología, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Ciudad de Mexico 04530, Mexico
                [3 ]Area of Neurosciences, Department Biology of Reproduction Unidad Iztapalapa, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Ciudad de Mexico 09340, Mexico
                [4 ]Brain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59056-450, Brazil; clausqueiroz@ 123456neuro.ufrn.br
                [5 ]Servicio de Electromedicina, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de Mexico 04530, Mexico; lrgallardo67@ 123456yahoo.com
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: julietamt14@ 123456hotmail.com (J.G.M.-T.); zrzamudio@ 123456hotmail.com (S.R.Z.)
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0702-5318
                Article
                brainsci-10-00634
                10.3390/brainsci10090634
                7565946
                32933015
                cab2c244-ac09-4163-a724-a177ecebfc6b
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 05 August 2020
                : 10 September 2020
                Categories
                Article

                inhibitory transmission,synaptic plasticity,temporal lobe epilepsy,evoked field potentials,levetiracetam

                Comments

                Comment on this article