7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      National mitigation potential from natural climate solutions in the tropics

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Better land stewardship is needed to achieve the Paris Agreement's temperature goal, particularly in the tropics, where greenhouse gas emissions from the destruction of ecosystems are largest, and where the potential for additional land carbon storage is greatest. As countries enhance their nationally determined contributions (NDCs) to the Paris Agreement, confusion persists about the potential contribution of better land stewardship to meeting the Agreement's goal to hold global warming below 2°C. We assess cost-effective tropical country-level potential of natural climate solutions (NCS)—protection, improved management and restoration of ecosystems—to deliver climate mitigation linked with sustainable development goals (SDGs). We identify groups of countries with distinctive NCS portfolios, and we explore factors (governance, financial capacity) influencing the feasibility of unlocking national NCS potential. Cost-effective tropical NCS offers globally significant climate mitigation in the coming decades (6.56 Pg CO 2e yr −1 at less than 100 US$ per Mg CO 2e). In half of the tropical countries, cost-effective NCS could mitigate over half of national emissions. In more than a quarter of tropical countries, cost-effective NCS potential is greater than national emissions. We identify countries where, with international financing and political will, NCS can cost-effectively deliver the majority of enhanced NDCs while transforming national economies and contributing to SDGs.

          This article is part of the theme issue ‘Climate change and ecosystems: threats, opportunities and solutions’.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Natural climate solutions

          Significance Most nations recently agreed to hold global average temperature rise to well below 2 °C. We examine how much climate mitigation nature can contribute to this goal with a comprehensive analysis of “natural climate solutions” (NCS): 20 conservation, restoration, and/or improved land management actions that increase carbon storage and/or avoid greenhouse gas emissions across global forests, wetlands, grasslands, and agricultural lands. We show that NCS can provide over one-third of the cost-effective climate mitigation needed between now and 2030 to stabilize warming to below 2 °C. Alongside aggressive fossil fuel emissions reductions, NCS offer a powerful set of options for nations to deliver on the Paris Climate Agreement while improving soil productivity, cleaning our air and water, and maintaining biodiversity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Analysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change.

            What we eat greatly influences our personal health and the environment we all share. Recent analyses have highlighted the likely dual health and environmental benefits of reducing the fraction of animal-sourced foods in our diets. Here, we couple for the first time, to our knowledge, a region-specific global health model based on dietary and weight-related risk factors with emissions accounting and economic valuation modules to quantify the linked health and environmental consequences of dietary changes. We find that the impacts of dietary changes toward less meat and more plant-based diets vary greatly among regions. The largest absolute environmental and health benefits result from diet shifts in developing countries whereas Western high-income and middle-income countries gain most in per capita terms. Transitioning toward more plant-based diets that are in line with standard dietary guidelines could reduce global mortality by 6-10% and food-related greenhouse gas emissions by 29-70% compared with a reference scenario in 2050. We find that the monetized value of the improvements in health would be comparable with, or exceed, the value of the environmental benefits although the exact valuation method used considerably affects the estimated amounts. Overall, we estimate the economic benefits of improving diets to be 1-31 trillion US dollars, which is equivalent to 0.4-13% of global gross domestic product (GDP) in 2050. However, significant changes in the global food system would be necessary for regional diets to match the dietary patterns studied here.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A roadmap for rapid decarbonization

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
                Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci
                RSTB
                royptb
                Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
                The Royal Society
                0962-8436
                1471-2970
                16 March 2020
                27 January 2020
                27 January 2020
                : 375
                : 1794 , Theme issue ‘Climate change and ecosystems: threats, opportunities and solutions’ compiled and edited by Janet Franklin, Yadvinder Malhi, Nathalie Seddon, Martin Solan, Chris Field, Nancy Knowlton and Monica Turner
                : 20190126
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Conservation International , 2011 Crystal Drive #600, Arlington, VA 22202, USA
                [2 ]Earth Innovation Institute , 98 Battery Street, Suite 250, San Francisco, CA 94111, USA
                [3 ]The Nature Conservancy , 4245 Fairfax Avenue, Suite 100, Arlington, VA 22203-1606, USA
                [4 ]Land Use and Climate Knowledge Initiative, Global Philanthropy Partnership , 2440 N Lakeview #15A, Chicago, IL 60614, USA
                [5 ]College of Engineering, Mathematics, and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter , Exeter EX4 4QF, UK
                [6 ]Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California , Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
                [7 ]Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, WI 53706, USA
                [8 ]United States Agency for International Development , 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004, USA
                [9 ]Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia , Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
                [10 ]Environmental Change Institute, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford , Oxford OX1 3QY, UK
                [11 ]The Nature Conservancy , Calle 67 #7–94, Piso 3, Bogota, Colombia
                [12 ]Earth Day Network, 1616 P Street NW, Suite 340, Washington, DC 20036, USA
                [13 ]Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen , Aberdeen AB24 3UU, UK
                [14 ]Department of International Politics, University of Potsdam , D-14469 Potsdam or Climate Focus, Schwedter Strasse 253, 10199 Berlin, Germany
                [15 ]Woods Hole Research Center , Falmouth, MA 02540, USA
                [16 ]Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge , Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK
                Author notes

                One contribution of 20 to a theme issue ‘ Climate change and ecosystems: threats, opportunities and solutions’.

                Electronic supplementary material is available online at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4784610.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8496-7213
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1377-1539
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3503-4783
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0201-9859
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3821-6435
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3784-1124
                Article
                rstb20190126
                10.1098/rstb.2019.0126
                7017762
                31983330
                caabe37f-1d85-4fdc-bf44-6cfe5f25cdb0
                © 2020 The Authors.

                Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 30 September 2019
                Categories
                1001
                69
                60
                15
                204
                Articles
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                March 16, 2020

                Philosophy of science
                natural climate solutions,climate mitigation,protection,land management,restoration,paris agreement

                Comments

                Comment on this article