Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Social support as a mediator of stress and life satisfaction for people with intellectual or developmental disabilities during the COVID‐19 pandemic

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          This study examined factors that predict stress level and life satisfaction among adults with intellectual or developmental disabilities during the COVID‐19 pandemic and the role of social support.

          Method

          From a larger study about the experiences during the pandemic of 2028 individuals with and without disabilities, 181 adults with intellectual or developmental disabilities (or proxy) responded.

          Results

          Most respondents with intellectual or developmental disabilities (92.8%) reported negative impacts from the pandemic, with 55.2% of the 96 employed pre‐pandemic reporting impacted employment, including job loss. The negative impact of the pandemic was a significant predictor of stress level; social support was related to reduced stress. Stress level and the negative impact of the pandemic were inversely related to life satisfaction; social support was positively related to life satisfaction. Social support partially mediated the association between stress level and life satisfaction.

          Discussion

          Comprehensive services and social support systems are needed to combat the impact of the pandemic.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence

          Summary The December, 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak has seen many countries ask people who have potentially come into contact with the infection to isolate themselves at home or in a dedicated quarantine facility. Decisions on how to apply quarantine should be based on the best available evidence. We did a Review of the psychological impact of quarantine using three electronic databases. Of 3166 papers found, 24 are included in this Review. Most reviewed studies reported negative psychological effects including post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, and anger. Stressors included longer quarantine duration, infection fears, frustration, boredom, inadequate supplies, inadequate information, financial loss, and stigma. Some researchers have suggested long-lasting effects. In situations where quarantine is deemed necessary, officials should quarantine individuals for no longer than required, provide clear rationale for quarantine and information about protocols, and ensure sufficient supplies are provided. Appeals to altruism by reminding the public about the benefits of quarantine to wider society can be favourable.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Global Measure of Perceived Stress

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A power primer.

              One possible reason for the continued neglect of statistical power analysis in research in the behavioral sciences is the inaccessibility of or difficulty with the standard material. A convenient, although not comprehensive, presentation of required sample sizes is provided here. Effect-size indexes and conventional values for these are given for operationally defined small, medium, and large effects. The sample sizes necessary for .80 power to detect effects at these levels are tabled for eight standard statistical tests: (a) the difference between independent means, (b) the significance of a product-moment correlation, (c) the difference between independent rs, (d) the sign test, (e) the difference between independent proportions, (f) chi-square tests for goodness of fit and contingency tables, (g) one-way analysis of variance, and (h) the significance of a multiple or multiple partial correlation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                fishermh@msu.edu
                csung@msu.edu
                Journal
                J Appl Res Intellect Disabil
                J Appl Res Intellect Disabil
                10.1111/(ISSN)1468-3148
                JAR
                Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
                Blackwell Publishing Ltd (Oxford, UK )
                1360-2322
                1468-3148
                11 October 2021
                11 October 2021
                : 10.1111/jar.12943
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA
                [ 2 ] Center for Research on Autism, Intellectual, and Neurodevelopmental Disabilities Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA
                [ 3 ] Department of Special Education Changwon National University Changwon South Korea
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Marisa H. Fisher and Connie Sung, Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education, Michigan State University, 620 Farm Lane, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

                Email: fishermh@ 123456msu.edu and csung@ 123456msu.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4938-4773
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7564-3738
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3272-7063
                Article
                JAR12943
                10.1111/jar.12943
                8646736
                34633129
                ca68f7b3-1ba2-47ef-987b-a0525005493d
                © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                : 04 September 2021
                : 17 February 2021
                : 16 September 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 5, Pages: 9, Words: 7818
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.9 mode:remove_FC converted:06.12.2021

                covid‐19,employment,satisfaction with life,social support,stress,well‐being

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content138

                Cited by7

                Most referenced authors3,214