15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Long QT syndrome: Diagnosis and management

      American Heart Journal
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          SCN5A mutations associated with an inherited cardiac arrhythmia, long QT syndrome.

          Long QT syndrome (LQT) is an inherited disorder that causes sudden death from cardiac arrhythmias, specifically torsade de pointes and ventricular fibrillation. We previously mapped three LQT loci: LQT1 on chromosome 11p15.5, LQT2 on 7q35-36, and LQT3 on 3p21-24. Here we report genetic linkage between LQT3 and polymorphisms within SCN5A, the cardiac sodium channel gene. Single strand conformation polymorphism and DNA sequence analyses reveal identical intragenic deletions of SCN5A in affected members of two unrelated LQT families. The deleted sequences reside in a region that is important for channel inactivation. These data suggest that mutations in SCN5A cause chromosome 3-linked LQT and indicate a likely cellular mechanism for this disorder.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Genotype-phenotype correlation in the long-QT syndrome: gene-specific triggers for life-threatening arrhythmias.

            The congenital long-QT syndrome (LQTS) is caused by mutations on several genes, all of which encode cardiac ion channels. The progressive understanding of the electrophysiological consequences of these mutations opens unforeseen possibilities for genotype-phenotype correlation studies. Preliminary observations suggested that the conditions ("triggers") associated with cardiac events may in large part be gene specific. We identified 670 LQTS patients of known genotype (LQT1, n=371; LQT2, n=234; LQT3, n=65) who had symptoms (syncope, cardiac arrest, sudden death) and examined whether 3 specific triggers (exercise, emotion, and sleep/rest without arousal) differed according to genotype. LQT1 patients experienced the majority of their events (62%) during exercise, and only 3% occurred during rest/sleep. These percentages were almost reversed among LQT2 and LQT3 patients, who were less likely to have events during exercise (13%) and more likely to have events during rest/sleep (29% and 39%). Lethal and nonlethal events followed the same pattern. Corrected QT interval did not differ among LQT1, LQT2, and LQT3 patients (498, 497, and 506 ms, respectively). The percent of patients who were free of recurrence with ss-blocker therapy was higher and the death rate was lower among LQT1 patients (81% and 4%, respectively) than among LQT2 (59% and 4%, respectively) and LQT3 (50% and 17%, respectively) patients. Life-threatening arrhythmias in LQTS patients tend to occur under specific circumstances in a gene-specific manner. These data allow new insights into the mechanisms that relate the electrophysiological consequences of mutations on specific genes to clinical manifestations and offer the possibility of complementing traditional therapy with gene-specific approaches.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A structural basis for drug-induced long QT syndrome.

              Mutations in the HERG K(+) channel gene cause inherited long QT syndrome (LQT), a disorder of cardiac repolarization that predisposes affected individuals to lethal arrhythmias [Curran, M. E. , Splawski, I., Timothy, K. W., Vincent, G. M., Green, E. D. & Keating, M. T. (1995) Cell 80, 795-804]. Acquired LQT is far more common and is most often caused by block of cardiac HERG K(+) channels by commonly used medications [Roden, D. M., Lazzara, R., Rosen, M., Schwartz, P. J., Towbin, J. & Vincent, G. M. (1996) Circulation 94, 1996-2012]. It is unclear why so many structurally diverse compounds block HERG channels, but this undesirable side effect now is recognized as a major hurdle in the development of new and safe drugs. Here we use alanine-scanning mutagenesis to determine the structural basis for high-affinity drug block of HERG channels by MK-499, a methanesulfonanilide antiarrhythmic drug. The binding site, corroborated with homology modeling, is comprised of amino acids located on the S6 transmembrane domain (G648, Y652, and F656) and pore helix (T623 and V625) of the HERG channel subunit that face the cavity of the channel. Other compounds that are structurally unrelated to MK-499, but cause LQT, also were studied. The antihistamine terfenadine and a gastrointestinal prokinetic drug, cisapride, interact with Y652 and F656, but not with V625. The aromatic residues of the S6 domain that interact with these drugs (Y652 and F656) are unique to eag/erg K(+) channels. Other voltage-gated K(+) (Kv) channels have Ile and Val (Ile) in the equivalent positions. These findings suggest a possible structural explanation for how so many commonly used medications block HERG but not other Kv channels and should facilitate the rational design of drugs devoid of HERG channel binding activity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                American Heart Journal
                American Heart Journal
                Elsevier BV
                00028703
                January 2002
                January 2002
                : 143
                : 1
                : 7-14
                Article
                10.1067/mhj.2002.120295
                11773906
                ca5009ed-ce1f-4765-b7d4-41e0fa5aeca5
                © 2002

                http://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article