18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      UK parents’ attitudes towards meningococcal group B (MenB) vaccination: a qualitative analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          (1) To explore existing knowledge of, and attitudes, to group B meningococcal disease and serogroup B meningococcal (MenB) vaccine among parents of young children. (2) To seek views on their information needs.

          Design

          Cross-sectional qualitative study using individual and group interviews conducted in February and March 2015, prior to the introduction of MenB vaccine (Bexsero) into the UK childhood immunisation schedule.

          Setting

          Community centres, mother and toddler groups, parents’ homes and workplaces in London and Yorkshire.

          Participants

          60 parents of children under 2 years of age recruited via mother and baby groups and via an advert posted to a midwife-led Facebook group.

          Results

          Although recognising the severity of meningitis and septicaemia, parents’ knowledge of group B meningococcal disease and MenB vaccine was poor. While nervous about fever, most said they would take their child for MenB vaccination despite its link to fever. Most parents had liquid paracetamol at home. Many were willing to administer it after MenB vaccination as a preventive measure, although some had concerns. There were mixed views on the acceptability of four vaccinations at the 12-month booster visit; some preferred one visit, while others favoured spreading the vaccines over two visits. Parents were clear on the information they required before attending the immunisation appointment.

          Conclusions

          The successful implementation of the MenB vaccination programme depends on its acceptance by parents. In view of parents’ recognition of the severity of meningitis and septicaemia, and successful introduction of other vaccines to prevent bacterial meningitis and septicaemia, the MenB vaccination programme is likely to be successful. However, the need for additional injections, the likelihood of post-immunisation fever and its management are issues about which parents will need information and reassurance from healthcare professionals. Public Health England has developed written information for parents, informed by these findings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Understanding vaccine hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination from a global perspective: a systematic review of published literature, 2007-2012.

          Vaccine "hesitancy" is an emerging term in the literature and discourse on vaccine decision-making and determinants of vaccine acceptance. It recognizes a continuum between the domains of vaccine acceptance and vaccine refusal and de-polarizes previous characterization of individuals and groups as either anti-vaccine or pro-vaccine. The primary aims of this systematic review are to: 1) identify research on vaccine hesitancy; 2) identify determinants of vaccine hesitancy in different settings including its context-specific causes, its expression and its impact; and 3) inform the development of a model for assessing determinants of vaccine hesitancy in different settings as proposed by the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts Working Group (SAGE WG) for dealing with vaccine hesitancy. A broad search strategy, built to capture multiple dimensions of public trust, confidence and hesitancy around vaccines, was applied across multiple databases. Peer-reviewed studies were selected for inclusion if they focused on childhood vaccines [≤ 7 years of age], used multivariate analyses, and were published between January 2007 and November 2012. Our results show a variety of factors as being associated with vaccine hesitancy but they do not allow for a complete classification and confirmation of their independent and relative strength of influence. Determinants of vaccine hesitancy are complex and context-specific - varying across time, place and vaccines. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Using thematic analysis in psychology

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Parental delay or refusal of vaccine doses, childhood vaccination coverage at 24 months of age, and the Health Belief Model.

              We evaluated the association between parents' beliefs about vaccines, their decision to delay or refuse vaccines for their children, and vaccination coverage of children at aged 24 months.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2017
                4 May 2017
                : 7
                : 4
                : e012851
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentDepartment of Health Sciences , University of York , York, UK
                [2 ] Public Health England , London, UK
                [3 ] UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health , London, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr. Helen Bedford; h.bedford@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0908-1380
                Article
                bmjopen-2016-012851
                10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012851
                5623433
                28473508
                ca17af90-5574-43ec-be57-cb3e670ecf79
                © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 29 May 2016
                : 21 March 2017
                : 21 March 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002141, Public Health England;
                Categories
                Immunology (Including Allergy)
                Research
                1506
                1705
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                menb,meningococcal,vaccination,immunisation,immunization
                Medicine
                menb, meningococcal, vaccination, immunisation, immunization

                Comments

                Comment on this article