22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ambroxol for the Treatment of Patients With Parkinson Disease With and Without Glucocerebrosidase Gene Mutations : A Nonrandomized, Noncontrolled Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Does ambroxol cross the blood-brain barrier, and what are the biochemical changes associated with ambroxol therapy in patients with Parkinson disease with and without glucocerebrosidase gene mutations?

          Findings

          In this open-label clinical trial of 17 patients with Parkinson disease, ambroxol crossed the blood-brain barrier and bound to the β-glucocerebrosidase enzyme, and it increased β-glucocerebrosidase enzyme protein levels and cerebrospinal fluid α-synuclein levels in patients both with and without glucocerebrosidase gene mutations.

          Meaning

          Ambroxol therapy has potential for study as a neuroprotective compound for the treatment of patients with Parkinson disease both with and without glucocerebrosidase gene mutations.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Mutations of the glucocerebrosidase gene, GBA1 (OMIM 606463), are the most important risk factor for Parkinson disease (PD). In vitro and in vivo studies have reported that ambroxol increases β-glucocerebrosidase (GCase) enzyme activity and reduces α-synuclein levels. These observations support a potential role for ambroxol therapy in modifying a relevant pathogenetic pathway in PD.

          Objective

          To assess safety, tolerability, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) penetration, and target engagement of ambroxol therapy with GCase in patients with PD with and without GBA1 mutations.

          Interventions

          An escalating dose of oral ambroxol to 1.26 g per day.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This single-center open-label noncontrolled clinical trial was conducted between January 11, 2017, and April 25, 2018, at the Leonard Wolfson Experimental Neuroscience Centre, a dedicated clinical research facility and part of the University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology in London, United Kingdom. Participants were recruited from established databases at the Royal Free London Hospital and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery in London. Twenty-four patients with moderate PD were evaluated for eligibility, and 23 entered the study. Of those, 18 patients completed the study; 1 patient was excluded (failed lumbar puncture), and 4 patients withdrew (predominantly lumbar puncture–related complications). All data analyses were performed from November 1 to December 14, 2018.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Primary outcomes at 186 days were the detection of ambroxol in the CSF and a change in CSF GCase activity.

          Results

          Of the 18 participants (15 men [83.3%]; mean [SD] age, 60.2 [9.7] years) who completed the study, 17 (8 with GBA1 mutations and 9 without GBA1 mutations) were included in the primary analysis. Between days 0 and 186, a 156-ng/mL increase in the level of ambroxol in CSF (lower 95% confidence limit, 129 ng/mL; P < .001) was observed. The CSF GCase activity decreased by 19% (0.059 nmol/mL per hour; 95% CI, –0.115 to –0.002; P = .04). The ambroxol therapy was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events. An increase of 50 pg/mL (13%) in the CSF α-synuclein concentration (95% CI, 14-87; P = .01) and an increase of 88 ng/mol (35%) in the CSF GCase protein levels (95% CI, 40-137; P = .002) were observed. Mean (SD) scores on part 3 of the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale decreased (ie, improved) by 6.8 (7.1) points (95% CI, –10.4 to –3.1; P = .001). These changes were observed in patients with and without GBA1 mutations.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          The study results suggest that ambroxol therapy was safe and well tolerated; CSF penetration and target engagement of ambroxol were achieved, and CSF α-synuclein levels were increased. Placebo-controlled clinical trials are needed to examine whether ambroxol therapy is associated with changes in the natural progression of PD.

          Trial Registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02941822; EudraCT identifier: 2015-002571-24

          Abstract

          This single-center open-label nonrandomized, noncontrolled trial assesses the safety, tolerability, cerebrospinal fluid penetration, and biochemical changes associated with ambroxol therapy for the treatment of patients with Parkinson disease with and without mutations in the glucocerebrosidase gene.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

          (2013)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases.

            Few detailed clinico-pathological correlations of Parkinson's disease have been published. The pathological findings in 100 patients diagnosed prospectively by a group of consultant neurologists as having idiopathic Parkinson's disease are reported. Seventy six had nigral Lewy bodies, and in all of these Lewy bodies were also found in the cerebral cortex. In 24 cases without Lewy bodies, diagnoses included progressive supranuclear palsy, multiple system atrophy, Alzheimer's disease, Alzheimer-type pathology, and basal ganglia vascular disease. The retrospective application of recommended diagnostic criteria improved the diagnostic accuracy to 82%. These observations call into question current concepts of Parkinson's disease as a single distinct morbid entity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Neurol
                JAMA Neurol
                JAMA Neurol
                JAMA Neurology
                American Medical Association
                2168-6149
                2168-6157
                April 2020
                13 January 2020
                13 January 2020
                : 77
                : 4
                : 427-434
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine, University of Plymouth School of Medicine, Plymouth, United Kingdom
                [3 ]NIHR UCLH Clinical Research Facility, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
                [4 ]Translational Mass Spectrometry Research Group, University College London Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
                [5 ]Department of Medical Statistics, University of Plymouth School of Medicine, Plymouth, United Kingdom
                [6 ]Neurogenetics Unit, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
                [7 ]Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
                [8 ]UK Dementia Research Institute at University College London, London, United Kingdom
                [9 ]Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Molndal, Sweden
                [10 ]Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Molndal, Sweden
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: November 8, 2019.
                Published Online: January 13, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.4611
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2020 Mullin S et al. JAMA Neurology.
                Corresponding Author: Anthony H. V. Schapira, MD, DSc, FRCP, FMedSci, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Rowland Hill Street, Royal Free Campus, Hampstead, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom ( a.schapira@ 123456ucl.ac.uk ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Mullin and Schapira had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Mullin, D'Souza, Woodgate, Elflein, Limousin, Libri, Schapira.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Mullin, Smith, Lee, Woodgate, Elflein, Hällqvist, Toffoli, Streeter, Hosking, Heywood, Khengar, Campbell, Hehir, Cable, Mills, Zetterberg, Libri, Foltynie, Schapira.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Mullin, Smith, D'Souza, Hällqvist, Streeter, Khengar, Campbell, Mills, Libri, Schapira.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Mullin, Smith, Lee, Woodgate, Elflein, Toffoli, Streeter, Hosking, Heywood, Campbell, Hehir, Cable, Zetterberg, Limousin, Libri, Foltynie.
                Statistical analysis: Mullin, Streeter, Hosking.
                Obtained funding: Mullin, Libri, Schapira.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Mullin, Lee, D'Souza, Woodgate, Elflein, Hällqvist, Toffoli, Heywood, Khengar, Hehir, Cable, Mills, Zetterberg.
                Supervision: Elflein, Limousin, Schapira.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Foltynie reported having received honoraria for speaking at meetings supported by Profile Pharma, BIAL, AbbVie; having served on advisory boards for BIAL, Oxford Biomedica, Living Cell Technologies, and Peptron. Dr Zetterberg reported having served at scientific advisory boards for Roche Diagnostics, Wave, Samumed, and CogRx; having given lectures in symposia sponsored by Alzecure and Biogen; and reported being a cofounder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB, a GU Ventures-based platform company at the University of Gothenburg. Dr Limousin reported having received travel support and honoraria from Boston Scientific and Medtronic. Dr Heywood reported having received funding and travel support from Shire Pharmaceuticals; and reported having received honoraria from Freeline Therapeutics. Dr Mills reported having received honoraria from Freeline Therapeutics; and having received travel support from Actelion and Genzyme Sanofi. Dr Libri reported having served on Advisory Boards for Biogen and Nova Laboratories Ltd. Dr Streeter reported being a consultant to Sanofi, Prevail, Inflazome, and Kyowa. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This research was funded by grant 555854 from the Cure Parkinson’s Disease Trust, grants MR/L50/499/1 and MR/M006646/1 from the Medical Research Council, grant 2018-02532 from the Swedish Research Council (Dr Zetterberg), grant 681712 from the European Research Council (Dr Zetterberg), and grant ALFGBG-720931 from Swedish State Support for Clinical Research (Dr Zetterberg). This research was also supported by the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, the Leonard Wolfson Experimental Neurology Centre, the Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre (Dr Mills), and the UK Dementia Research Institute (Dr Zetterberg),
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Article
                noi190109
                10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.4611
                6990847
                31930374
                c9fb8555-1f2b-4966-86f5-dd6e6286ecc5
                Copyright 2020 Mullin S et al. JAMA Neurology.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 6 September 2019
                : 8 November 2019
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Featured
                Online First
                Comments

                Comments

                Comment on this article