21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Efficacy and safety of the elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor combination regimen in people with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del mutation: a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial

      , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
      The Lancet
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators correct the basic defect caused by CFTR mutations. Improvements in health outcomes have been achieved using the combination of a CFTR corrector and potentiator in people with CF (pwCF) homozygous for F508del . The addition of elexacaftor (ELX; VX-445), a next-generation CFTR corrector, to tezacaftor/ivacaftor (TEZ/IVA) further improved F508del-CFTR function and clinical outcomes in a phase 2 study in pwCF homozygous for F508del . A phase 3, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled trial of ELX in triple combination with TEZ/IVA (ELX/TEZ/IVA) in pwCF homozygous for F508del was conducted. Eligible participants were aged ≥12 years with stable disease and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV 1 ) of 40 to 90, inclusive. After a four-week TEZ/IVA run-in, participants were randomised 1:1 to four weeks of ELX/TEZ/IVA versus TEZ/IVA alone. The primary endpoint was absolute change from baseline (measured at the end of the TEZ/IVA run-in) in ppFEV 1 at week 4. Key secondary endpoints were absolute change in sweat chloride and CF Questionnaire–Revised respiratory domain (CFQ-R RD) score. ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT03525548 . Between August and December 2018, 113 participants were enrolled. Following the run-in, 107 participants were randomised and completed the 4-week treatment period. The ELX/TEZ/IVA group had improvements in ppFEV 1 (10·0 percentage points, 95% CI 7·4 to 12·6, p<0·0001), sweat chloride concentration (−45·1 mmol/L, 95% CI −50·1 to −40·1, p<0·0001), and CFQ-R RD score (17·4 points, 95% CI 11·8 to 23·0, p<0·0001) compared with the TEZ/IVA group. ELX/TEZ/IVA was well tolerated, with no discontinuations. Most adverse events were mild or moderate; serious adverse events occurred in 4% (n=2) of participants receiving ELX/TEZ/IVA and 2% (n=1) receiving TEZ/IVA. ELX/TEZ/IVA provided clinically robust benefit vs TEZ/IVA alone with a favourable safety profile and demonstrates the potential to lead to transformative improvements in the lives of pwCF homozygous for F508del .

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          The Lancet
          The Lancet
          Elsevier BV
          01406736
          November 2019
          November 2019
          : 394
          : 10212
          : 1940-1948
          Article
          10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32597-8
          7571408
          31679946
          c9de02ba-e557-4b41-838d-b37ee496eeab
          © 2019

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article