0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives on forensic risk assessment

      research-article
      a , a , b , a
      Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law
      Routledge
      Australia, corrections, culture, indigenous, risk assessment

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Risk assessment instruments are used to estimate risk of recidivism and aid in decision-making and treatment planning. However, many of these instruments, including the Level of Service/Risk, Need, Responsivity (LS/RNR), are validated on predominantly Western populations, and research has questioned whether the factors included in the LS/RNR adequately capture the experiences and needs of non-Western communities, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders. The current study aimed to canvas the opinions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community justice workers as to the suitability of the LS/RNR for use with this population. A general qualitative methodology was adopted to gain in-depth information through the facilitation of a focus group, and data were analysed thematically. Whilst participants agreed that the LS/RNR risk factors are relevant to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander offenders, they reported that the instrument did not adequately capture relevant culturally specific considerations and made suggestions to improve the LS/RNR.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Classification for Effective Rehabilitation: Rediscovering Psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact: A Study of Bias in Recidivism Prediction Instruments

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Psychiatr Psychol Law
                Psychiatr Psychol Law
                Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law
                Routledge
                1321-8719
                1934-1687
                20 April 2023
                2024
                20 April 2023
                : 31
                : 2
                : 189-215
                Affiliations
                [a ]Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology , Melbourne, VIC, Australia
                [b ]School of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology , Melbourne, VIC, Australia
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Samantha Venner, Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, 1/582 Heidelberg Rd, Alphington, 3078 , Victoria, Australia. Email: svenner@ 123456swin.edu.au
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3658-0871
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2682-197X
                Article
                2192254
                10.1080/13218719.2023.2192254
                11018076
                38628247
                c996c478-be69-44b7-9062-e0e237717d1f
                © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Pages: 27, Words: 14896
                Categories
                Research Article
                Articles

                australia,corrections,culture,indigenous,risk assessment
                australia, corrections, culture, indigenous, risk assessment

                Comments

                Comment on this article